Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/855,844

LEAKTIGHT AND THERMALLY INSULATING VESSEL, AND ASSOCIATED METHOD FOR PLACING UNDER VACUUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 10, 2024
Examiner
CASTELLANO, STEPHEN J
Art Unit
3733
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Gaztransport Et Technigaz
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
790 granted / 1217 resolved
-5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1256
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1217 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 3-5, 8-9, 11 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claims 3, 4, 5, 8 and 11, the phrase "preferentially" renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitations following the phrase are part of the claimed invention. See MPEP § 2173.05(d). Claim 20 recites the limitation "the carbon dioxide" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-2, 6-7, 10, 12-19 and 21 are allowed. Claims 3-5, 8-9, 11 and 20 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: WO 2015/078972 (Spittael et al.) (Spittael) is the closest known prior art. In the written opinion for PCT/EP2023/059702 mailed 05 July 2023 (this application is the national stage of PCT/EP2023/059702), the written opinion considers document D1 (WO 2015/078972) and states that the claims of the PCT are either not novel or do not include an inventive step over D1. Helium and argon are considered main chemical species (gases) as elements of the replacement gas phase used in the method of claim 1 and used in the steps of replacing a gas phase (by injecting the replacement gas phase into the intermediate space), lowering the pressure in the intermediate space and applying cold by injecting a fluid into the internal space. However, the written opinion does not meet the claim 1 limitation which states “wherein the pressure threshold is below the triple point of said or each main chemical species, in order to condense said or each main chemical species into a solid phase.” The written opinion states that this condition is met by stating “(implicit because helium or argon).” Helium has no triple point. Argon has a triple point at 83.80 degree K. However, there is no evidence of argon reaching the triple point or a temperature below 83.80 degree K. The written opinion only speculating that filling the tank with LNG is at a temperature below 273 degree K or 0 degree C. It is not understood how filling the internal space with LNG at 273 degrees K will drop the temperature of the intermediate vacuum space to a temperature below 83.80 degree K. Furthermore, there is a difference in the claim language of PCT/EP2023/059702 which states that the gas phase “consists of … optionally one or more residual chemical species” whereas claim 1 of the present application states that the gas phase “being composed of … and one or more residual chemical species.” There is no suggestion or evidence of a residual chemical species within Spittael. The written opinion did not need to show evidence of a residual chemical species whereas the residual chemical species is required by claim 1 of the present invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN J CASTELLANO whose telephone number is (571)272-4535. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan Jenness can be reached at 571-270-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. sjc/STEPHEN J CASTELLANO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3733
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12578061
SEALED AND THERMALLY INSULATING TANK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571219
DRYWALL MUD PAN CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12571502
WALL FOR A LEAKTIGHT AND THERMALLY INSULATING VESSEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12570141
VEHICLE FUEL STORAGE SYSTEM INCLUDING BLADDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565355
CONTAINER AND CUP SEPARATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.8%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month