Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/856,274

SIGN PREDICTION IN VIDEO CODING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2022 — IN 202241021948 +1 more
Examiner
FEREJA, SAMUEL D
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
4-5
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
490 granted / 653 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
723
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
69.5%
+29.5% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.8%
-31.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 653 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of the Claims Currently, claims 3-4 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhao et al. (US 20180176556, hereinafter Zhao) in view of CHOI et al. (US 20250220238 , hereinafter CHOI). Regarding Claim 3, Zhao discloses a method to perform sign prediction in video coding ([0034], transform coefficient sign bit prediction for video encoding and decoding, as applied for Intra or Inter code; [0064], predict the sign for one coefficient using both positive value and negative values for the respective sign), the method comprising: accessing a current coding unit (CU), a neighbor left CU to the current CU, and a neighbor top CU to the current CU, wherein the neighbor CUs comprise neighboring pixels ([0069], FIG. 3A, performing sign prediction with a template-based hypothesis reconstruction by recreating only the leftmost and topmost pixels of the block, from the inverse transformation added to the block prediction to create the leftmost and topmost pixel outputs); if the current CU is coded in intra mode, in computing a hypothesis cost to determine sign prediction, considering only neighboring pixels in a direction of the intra mode ([0247], [0248], cost function measures the pixel value difference or pixel gradient value difference along the intra prediction direction such as a partial subset of allowed intra prediction directions are pre-selected, and each allowed intra prediction direction is mapped to one of the pre-selected intra directions which approximates the intra prediction direction; [0117]). Zhao does not explicitly disclose wherein the hypothesis cost is computed at least in part with one or more residual hypothesis terms, wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are coded as a sign residual by an encoder, wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are provided by way of the sign residual to a decoder for computing the hypothesis cost. CHOI teaches wherein the hypothesis cost is computed at least in part with one or more residual hypothesis terms, wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are coded as a sign residual by an encoder wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are provided by way of the sign residual to a decoder for computing the hypothesis cost ([0010],deriving the number of prediction signs for the current block, performing sign prediction for the current block to derive the signs of the residual coefficients based on the number of prediction signs, deriving residual samples of the current block based on the signs, and encoding the image information including residual information of the current block and information on the number of prediction signs; [0113] The sign residual may be sent as “0” if the prediction corresponds to the true value of the sign, otherwise it may be sent as “1”. That is, if the value of the predicted sign is correct, a syntax element for the sign with a value of 0 can be transmitted, if the value of the predicted sign is incorrect, a syntax element for the sign with a value of 1 may be transmitted. The syntax element may also be called a sign residual.) PNG media_image1.png 354 436 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of hypothesis cost is computed at least in part with one or more residual hypothesis terms as taught by CHOI ([0047]) into the encoding & decoding system of Zhao in order to provide systems for enables establishing high-efficiency video compression technology to effectively compress, transmit, store, and reproduce high-resolution, high-quality video/image information, and increasing video/image coding efficiency (CHOI, [0004]). Regarding Claim 4, Zhao discloses a method to perform sign prediction in video coding ([0034], transform coefficient sign bit prediction for video encoding and decoding, as applied for Intra or Inter code; [0064], predict the sign for one coefficient using both positive value and negative values for the respective sign), the method comprising: accessing a current transform unit (TU), a neighbor left TU to the current TU, and a neighbor top TU to the current TU, wherein the neighbor TUs comprise neighboring pixels ([0069], FIG. 3A, performing sign prediction with a template-based hypothesis reconstruction by recreating only the leftmost and topmost pixels of the block, from the inverse transformation added to the block prediction to create the leftmost and topmost pixel outputs); accessing vectors lists of the current TU ([0067], FIG. 3A, coordinates of various pixels of transform coefficient block (TB) 42 with previously-reconstructed neighbor pixels as well as for the hypothesis reconstruction; FIG. 3B, mathematical formulae illustrating hypothesis reconstruction and prediction techniques ); and computing a hypothesis cost to determine sign prediction by considering only the neighbor TU with similar motion information ([0249] when intra prediction direction is not available (e.g., one block is coded with inter mode), a derived intra prediction mode may be used instead that comes from a block identified by a motion vector in a coded picture; [0291], improve the sign discrimination functions using estimates of the variances of errors in pixel predictions [including temporal with motion vector]). Zhao does not explicitly disclose wherein the hypothesis cost is computed at least in part with one or more residual hypothesis terms, wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are coded as a sign residual by an encoder, wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are provided by way of the sign residual to a decoder for computing the hypothesis cost. CHOI teaches wherein the hypothesis cost is computed at least in part with one or more residual hypothesis terms, wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are coded as a sign residual by an encoder wherein the one or more residual hypothesis terms are provided by way of the sign residual to a decoder for computing the hypothesis cost ([0010],deriving the number of prediction signs for the current block, performing sign prediction for the current block to derive the signs of the residual coefficients based on the number of prediction signs, deriving residual samples of the current block based on the signs, and encoding the image information including residual information of the current block and information on the number of prediction signs; [0113] The sign residual may be sent as “0” if the prediction corresponds to the true value of the sign, otherwise it may be sent as “1”. That is, if the value of the predicted sign is correct, a syntax element for the sign with a value of 0 can be transmitted, if the value of the predicted sign is incorrect, a syntax element for the sign with a value of 1 may be transmitted. The syntax element may also be called a sign residual.) PNG media_image1.png 354 436 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore, it would have been obvious to one ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of hypothesis cost is computed at least in part with one or more residual hypothesis terms as taught by CHOI ([0047]) into the encoding & decoding system of Zhao in order to provide systems for performing transform coding based on boundary matching costs of various transform parameters in an efficient manner thus improving the coding efficiency (CHOI, [0037]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Samuel D Fereja whose telephone number is (469)295-9243. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DAVID CZEKAJ can be reached at (571) 272-7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL D FEREJA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 6 earlier events
Mar 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 22, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 29, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770494
DIGITAL VIDEO ALARM LOITERING MONITORING COMPUTER SYSTEM
5y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12771834
SYSTEM FOR TRAINING AND DEPLOYING FILTERS FOR ENCODING AND DECODING
2y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12760710
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Wind Turbine Inspection Systems And Methods
2y 0m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756832
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED VIDEO DECODING APPARATUS AND VIDEO DECODING METHOD AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED VIDEO ENCODING APPARATUS AND VIDEO ENCODING METHOD WHICH PERFORM CHROMA COMPONENT PREDICTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756840
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENCODING INTRA PREDICTION MODE FOR EACH CHROMA COMPONENT
1y 11m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 7m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 653 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month