Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/856,311

METHOD FOR CARRYING OUT A FUNCTIONAL DIAGNOSIS OF AT LEAST ONE VEHICLE COMPONENT, AND DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 12, 2022 — DE 10 2022 001 254.5 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, BAO LONG T
Art Unit
3656
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Mercedes-Benz Group AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
453 granted / 547 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
566
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
77.5%
+37.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.4%
-32.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 547 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This is a non-final office action on the merits. Claims 1-10 are cancelled. Claims 10-18 are pending and addressed below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/11/2024 is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 7/21/2025 is being considered by the examiner. The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/19/2025 is being considered by the examiner. Non-English documents have been considered in as much as the drawings and translated portions provided therein (See MPEP 609). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 10, 13-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chen (US 20090276115 a reference in IDS 10/11/2024) in view of Bromley et al (US 20040167689) Regarding claims 10 and 16, Chen teaches: a diagnostic system comprising: a vehicle having an in-vehicle computing unit; and a first computing unit external to the vehicle, (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions); wherein the first computing unit external to the vehicle is configured to generate a diagnosis execution protocol, wherein the diagnostic execution protocol comprises machine-readable instructions for performing an at least semi-automated functional diagnosis of vehicle components by an in-vehicle computing unit; the first computing unit external to the vehicle is configured to transmit the diagnosis execution protocol to the in-vehicle computing unit of the vehicle; the in-vehicle computing unit is configured to execute the diagnosis execution protocol, wherein the in-vehicle computing unit is configured to control the at least one vehicle component to check for correct functioning of the at least one vehicle component, and wherein a response behavior of the at least one vehicle component is captured automatedly by the in-vehicle computing unit or with manual assistance by a person supervising the production of the vehicle; (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions; in particular [0040]-[0041] [0047]-[0049] [0054]-[0057] claim 1 step e) and the in-vehicle computing unit is configured to output the captured response behavior to the first computing unit external to the vehicle external to the vehicle. outputting the captured response behavior to the first computing unit external to the vehicle external to the vehicle or to a second computing unit external to the vehicle; (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions; in particular [0040]-[0041] [0047]-[0049] [0054]-[0057] claim 1 step e; claim 1 steps f-h) Chen does not explicitly teach: vehicle in production; However, this is an intended use that is of little patentable weight. Even if we give this patentable weight, vehicle in production is old and well-known. Official notice is hereby taken that it would have been old and well-known, and obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing and at the time of the invention to modify the system and method of Chen with vehicle in production to analyze quality of components manufacturing processes, and/or retrieve and manage warranty information. In addition and in the alternative, Lowrey et al. teaches: vehicle in production (at least [0036]-[0042]) to analyze quality of components manufacturing processes, and/or retrieve and manage warranty information ([0036]-[0042]); It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing and at the time of the invention to modify the system and method of Chen with vehicle in production taught by Lowrey et al. to analyze quality of components manufacturing processes, and/or retrieve and manage warranty information. Regarding claim 13, Chen teaches: wherein the in-vehicle computing unit is connected by wire or wirelessly to a common communication network with the first or second computing unit external to the vehicle and the in-vehicle computing unit exchanges information with the first or second computing unit external to the vehicle indirectly via a communication server (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions; in particular [0040]-[0041] [0047]-[0049] [0054]-[0057] claim 1 step e; claim 1 steps f-h; fig. 4 figs. 6-8 [0074]-[0095]); Regarding claim 14, Chen teaches: wherein the wireless communication employs Wi- Fi or mobile radio protocols (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions; in particular [0040]-[0041] [0047]-[0049] [0054]-[0057] claim 1 step e; claim 1 steps f-h; fig. 4 figs. 6-8 [0074]-[0095]); Regarding claim 15, Chen teaches: wherein the in-vehicle computing unit controls a manipulation machine external to the vehicle to perform at least one diagnostic step or to initiate measures if the correct functioning of the at least one vehicle component is disrupted (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions; in particular [0040]-[0041] [0047]-[0049] [0054]-[0057] claim 1 step e; claim 1 steps f-h; at least [0057] discussed “Once the higher level diagnostic data is received from the onboard computer 12 the diagnostic tool 10 may process the data and communicate the diagnosis to the user. One embodiment of the diagnostic tool 10 includes a display 26 and diagnostic indicators 28, such as emissions indicators, in electrical communication with the CPU 38. The tool 10 may additionally include a data logger 65 to allow the tool 10 to log data received from the computer 12”) Regarding claim 17, Chen teaches: at least one second computing unit external to the vehicle configured to receive or be controlled by information from the in-vehicle computing unit (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions; in particular [0040]-[0041] [0047]-[0049] [0054]-[0057] claim 1 step e; claim 1 steps f-h; fig. 4 figs. 6-8 [0074]-[0095]); Regarding claim 18, Chen teaches: a communication server configured to exchange information between the in- vehicle computing unit and the first computing unit external to the vehicle (at least figs. 3-5 [0038]-[0073] discussed diagnostic tool 10, onboard computer 12, discussed diagnostic tool 10 polls onboard computer 12 with initiation signals and different basic communication protocols to determine the basic communication protocol onboard computer is using; determine diagnostic protocol; basic communication protocols allow obtaining standard, or low level diagnostic data; diagnostic protocols allow communication with various components and functions; in particular [0040]-[0041] [0047]-[0049] [0054]-[0057] claim 1 step e; claim 1 steps f-h; fig. 4 figs. 6-8 [0074]-[0095]); Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-12 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BAO LONG T NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-7768. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khoi Tran can be reached at (571) 272-6919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BAO LONG T. NGUYEN Examiner Art Unit 3664 /BAO LONG T NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3656
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636101
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED DETERMINATION OF ROBOT BASE LOCATION VIA TROCAR'S ACCESSIBILITY MAP
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629841
METHOD FOR DETERMINING A MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN AN OBJECT AND AN APPARATUS SURFACE, SAFETY DEVICE FOR A HANDLING APPARATUS HAVING AN APPARATUS SURFACE, AND HANDLING APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629819
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DEXTEROUS MANIPULATION BY A ROBOT
2y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629838
METHOD FOR DETECTING OPERATING ANOMALIES OF AN UNCONSTRAINED MASTER DEVICE OF A MASTER-SLAVE ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR MEDICAL OR SURGICAL TELEOPERATION AND RELATED ROBOTIC SYSTEM
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630049
CONTROL SYSTEM
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+7.1%)
2y 10m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 547 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month