Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/856,338

Slider

Final Rejection §102§OTHER§Other
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 25, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022018732
Examiner
LAVINDER, JACK W
Art Unit
3677
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
YKK Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
1161 granted / 1779 resolved
+13.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1806
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.5%
+14.5% vs TC avg
§102
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1779 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §OTHER §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a(1) as being anticipated by Chan, US 2010/0186200 A1. Chan discloses a slider (11) comprising a slider body (12, 13) configured to guide elements in a front-rear direction; a pull tab holder (16) provided on a side of the slider body in an up-down direction orthogonal to the front-rear direction and configured to hold a shaft (34a) of a pull tab (34); and, a closure member (29) attached to the pull tab holder (figure 4). The pull tab holder (16) includes a first end portion extending from the slider body along the up-down direction; a body (16, figure 1) extending from the first end portion along the front-rear direction; a shaft-holding space (31, figure 7) being defined between the body (16) and the slider body (12) in which the shaft is disposed (figure 7); and, a second end portion (at end of leader line of 16 in figure 7) provided on a side of the body (16) opposite the first end portion (portion extending upwardly from an attached to the upper plate of the slider body 12) to face the slider body (figure 7); an insertion gap (17) being defined between the second end portion and the slider body (figure 1) into which the shaft is insertable (figure 5); the body (16) includes a through hole (20) penetrating through the body in the up-down direction and a pair of side walls facing each other across the through hole in a right-left direction orthogonal to each of the front-rear direction and the up-down direction (figure 1). The closure member (29) includes a base (portions extending downwardly from the top surface of the closure member) configured to fit between the pair of side walls (figure 4); and, a first leg (35a) extending from the base and configured to be fitted to the insertion gap (17, as can be see in figure 6). The leg (35a) extends into the gap (17) from a side of the shaft-holding space. Chan also discloses that the closure member (29) is configured to be inserted through the through hole (20) in the up-down direction (figure 3). Regarding claim 2, Chan discloses the pair of sidewalls are in engagement with the sides of the base (elements extending downward from the top surface of 29, figure 4). Regarding claim 3, Chan discloses the pull tab holder with a pair of front-rear opposing surfaces facing one another across the through hole and engaging the the surfaces on the closure member in the front-rear direction. Please see the annotated drawing on the subsequent page. PNG media_image1.png 552 784 media_image1.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. PNG media_image2.png 544 768 media_image2.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1-3 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACK W LAVINDER whose telephone number is (571)272-7119. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Friday 9-4pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at 571-272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JACK W. LAVINDER Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 3677 /JACK W LAVINDER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER, §Other
Apr 21, 2026
Response Filed
May 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635771
SLIDER FOR SLIDE FASTENER
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12630095
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR A VEHICLE ACCESSORY MOUNT SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623743
MOTORCYCLE LUGGAGE SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616282
ITEM OF JEWELLERY
1y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12611013
DEVICE COMPRISING DECORATIVE OBJECTS HAVING RESTRAINED FREEDOM TO MOVE AND SUSPENDED IN FLUID
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1779 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month