Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/856,350

DIGITAL PLATFORMS FOR GENERATING, REDEEMING, AND EXCHANGING TOKENIZED REPRESENTATIONS OF TANGIBLE ASSET OWNERSHIP

Non-Final OA §101§102§103
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 07, 2022 — provisional 63/328,687 +1 more
Examiner
PROIOS, GEORGE N
Art Unit
3694
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Certifiednft US LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
102 granted / 186 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
211
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.4%
+11.4% vs TC avg
§102
12.0%
-28.0% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 186 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction Applicant has elected Invention I, Claims 1-10 for prosecution on the merits, without traverse, in its Response to Restriction Requirement submitted on July 9, 2026. Applicant reserves the right to file one or more divisional applications to pursue the non-elected subject matter. Status of Application This is a non-final rejection in response to Election / Restriction Requirement relating to U.S. Patent Application No. 18/856,350, filed on October 11, 2024, which is a National Stage Application, filed under 35 U.S.C. 371, of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/017911, filed on April 7, 2023, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Application No. 63/328,687, filed April 7, 2022. Claims 1-10 are pending and have been examined. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement submitted by the Applicant on October 11, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. § 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-10 are rejected pursuant to 35 USC § 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. Step 1 - Statutory Class Claims 1-10 are directed to an apparatus. Therefore, on its face, each of Claims 1-10 is directed to a statutory class of invention. Step 2A, Prong 1 – Abstract Idea Claim 1 recites receive a request to generate an ownership interest in an asset, the request comprising elements of first data that characterize the ownership interest, receive elements of second data that characterize the ownership interest, based on a determined consistency between the elements of first and second data, generate and record information characterizing the ownership interest. The claim recites generating and recording an ownership interest in an asset, which amounts to commercial interactions falling under “Certain Methods of Organizing Human Activity” in MPEP 2106.04(a). Step 2A, Prong 2 – Practical Application Claim 1 recites a communications interface, a memory storing instructions, at least one processor coupled to the communications interface and to the memory, a device, a non-fungible token, a computing system, a distributed ledger and an application program. The additional elements are recited at a high level of generality and are being used as tools to implement the abstract idea, generally linking the abstract idea to blockchain technology. They do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application. They do not provide a technical improvement such as an improvement to the functioning of a computer or to technology or to a technical field because they only manipulate data. The claims do not invoke a particular machine as our guidance is clear that a generic computer is not the particular machine envisioned, they do not transform matter as they only manipulate data which is not matter. Step 2B – Significantly more As set forth in the discussion in Step 2A, Prong 2, above, the additional elements are recited at a high level of generality and are used as tools to implement the abstract idea, generally linking the abstract idea to blockchain technology. They do not integrate the abstract idea into a practical application or add significantly more to the abstract idea. Dependent claims Claim 2 (the asset comprises a tangible asset or a digital asset, and the elements of first data characterize the ownership interest of a user associated with the device in the at least one of the tangible asset or the digital asset), Claim 3 (the tangible asset comprises at least one of a parcel of real property, a physical unit of gold, or a tangible representation of at least one of an intangible asset or a digital asset), Claim 4 (the computing system is associated with a third-party administrator, the third-party administrator maintaining the tangible asset in accordance with an agreement between the user and the third-party administrator; the elements of first data comprise documentary data that characterize the ownership interest of the user in the tangible asset; and the elements of second data comprise asset data that characterizes the tangible asset and agreement data that characterizes the agreement), Claim 5 (obtain a digital representation of the tangible asset, the digital representation characterizing a current physical condition of the tangible asset; and generate a hash value based on at least a portion of the digital representation of the tangible asset, and perform the operations that generate the non-fungible token based on the hash value, the non-fungible token comprising the hash value), Claim 6 (generate linking data that associates the non-fungible token and the digital representation; and perform the operations that generate the non-fungible token based on the hash value and the linking data, the non-fungible token comprising the hash value and the linking data), Claim 7 (perform operations that transmit, via the communications interface, the non-fungible token and the digital representation of the tangible asset to the device, the non-fungible token and the digital representation of the tangible asset being transmitted via a programmatic interface of the executed application program), Claim 8 (the digital representation comprises a three-dimensional graphical representation of the tangible asset; and the executed application program causes the device is configured to present the three-dimensional graphical representation of the tangible asset within an interactive digital environment), Claim 9 (the information characterizing the non-fungible token comprises an alphanumeric identifier of the non-fungible token) and Claim 10 (receive a request to redeem the non-fungible token from the device via the communications interface, the request comprising the non-fungible token; based on a verified ownership interest in the asset and on a determined availability of the non-fungible token, generate a hash value representative of at least a portion of the non-fungible token, and perform operations that record the hash value and information characterizing the non-fungible token within an additional element of a distributed ledger; and perform operations that provision encrypted data to the computing system, the computing system being configured to decrypt the encrypted data and perform operations that trigger a release of documentation data associated with the ownership interest) contain additional elements (underlined above) that are recited at a high level of generality and are used to implement the abstract idea and/or further define and merely add specificity to the abstract idea. Thus, the dependent claims also fail to add significantly more to the abstract idea. As such, Claims 1-10 are not patent eligible. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-7 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 as being anticipated by Tran et al., US 2021/0256070 A1, (“Tran”). Claim 1: Tran teaches: An apparatus comprising: a communications interface; (See Tran, Par. 20 (In Fig. lA, the monitoring device used for a sport device 9 includes an interface with a radio transmitter for forwarding the result of the comparison to a remote device.)) a memory storing instructions; and at least one processor coupled to the communications interface and to the memory, the at least one processor being configured to execute the instructions to: receive, from a device via the communications interface, a request to generate a non-fungible token associated with an ownership interest in an asset, the request comprising elements of first data that characterize the ownership interest; (See Tran, Par. 175 (As described above, in various embodiments, the system generates Blockchain token transactions based on the wallet's content.)) receive, from a computing system via the communications interface, elements of second data that characterize the ownership interest; (See Tran, Par. 176 (Regardless of the coordinator, after each node is committed, appropriate transaction messages are broadcast to transfer Blockchain token ownership.)) based on a determined consistency between the elements of first and second data, perform operations that generate the non-fungible token and that record information characterizing the non-fungible token within an element of a distributed ledger; and (See Tran, Par. 376 (In one embodiment, the blockchain address is used to replace the databases holding registration information for trademarks, patents, designs and copyright. By registering IP rights on a distributed ledger, the IP provides smart intellectual property rights, providing a robust and trustworthy proof of record.)) perform operations that provision the non-fungible token to an application program executed by the device. (See Tran, Par. 375 (In another aspect of the invention, a system for recording ownership rights in an asset includes: a client computing device configured for generating an asset record having a fingerprint comprising a hash of a digital representation of the asset, a public key of a client who generates the asset record, and a digital signature comprising a private key of the creating client; a peer-to-peer network in communication with the client computing device to generate an entry in a public ledger.)) Claim 2: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 1 above. Tran further teaches: the asset comprises a tangible asset or a digital asset, and the elements of first data characterize the ownership interest of a user associated with the device in the at least one of the tangible asset or the digital asset. (See Tran, Par. 778 (The UCC tangible collateral category are used against 1) inventory, 2) equipment, 3) consumer goods, and 4) farm products. The system includes attachment code with 1) a security smart contract, 2) debtor agent has rights in the collateral, and 3) creditor agent gives value.)) Claim 3: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 2 above. Tran further teaches: the tangible asset comprises at least one of a parcel of real property, a physical unit of gold, or a tangible representation of at least one of an intangible asset or a digital asset. (See Tran, Par. 778 (The existence of that transaction in the blockchain proves that the digital asset (or intellectual property) existed at the time the transaction got included into a block.)) Claim 4: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 2 above. Tran further teaches: the computing system is associated with a third-party administrator, the third-party administrator maintaining the tangible asset in accordance with an agreement between the user and the third-party administrator; the elements of first data comprise documentary data that characterize the ownership interest of the user in the tangible asset; and the elements of second data comprise asset data that characterizes the tangible asset and agreement data that characterizes the agreement. (See Tran, Par. 107 (Since most agreements involve the exchange of economic value, or have economic consequences, categories of public and private law are implemented using Ethereum. An agreement involving transfer of value can be precisely defined and automatically enforced with the same script.), Par. 111 (The functionality of system in accordance with one embodiment is detailed when creating a contract/deal sheet template that can be used for authoring a contract. The system receives user attribute requests from the contract administrator and modifies the contract template accordingly. The attribute requests are generated by the contract administrator through various actions in the designer tool. The modified contract template is stored in data catalog for later use in order to create the contract)) Claim 5: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 2 above. Tran further teaches: at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to: obtain a digital representation of the tangible asset, the digital representation characterizing a current physical condition of the tangible asset; and generate a hash value based on at least a portion of the digital representation of the tangible asset, and perform the operations that generate the non-fungible token based on the hash value, the non-fungible token comprising the hash value. (See Tran, Par. 191 (The physical goods and materials are identified and linked with their digital representation on the blockchain using a label (e.g., serial numbers, bar codes, digital tags like RFID and NFC, genetic tags) that uniquely identifies a physical good with its digital counterpart. Alternatively, active memory can be formed using roll-to-roll electronic printing onto a tag and the app can store the position information and additional information to a circuit such as flexible circuit, a printed circuit, or an electronic tag with memory, and the tag can be associated with a product 3 as it moves through production and shipping processes. In one embodiment, the circuit can be "printed memory" that can collect and store information about the authenticity and condition of products.)) Claim 6: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 5 above. Tran further teaches: at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to: generate linking data that associates the non-fungible token and the digital representation; and perform the operations that generate the non-fungible token based on the hash value and the linking data, the non-fungible token comprising the hash value and the linking data. (See Tran, Par. 220 (The location of the user is verified, based on a second location detection method, using the computerized device. A blockchain hash or security key is established with a registration authority according to the location, using the computerized device.)) Claim 7: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 5 above. Tran further teaches: at least one processor is further configured to execute the instruction to perform operations that transmit, via the communications interface, the non-fungible token and the digital representation of the tangible asset to the device, the non-fungible token and the digital representation of the tangible asset being transmitted via a programmatic interface of the executed application program. (See Tran, Par. 856 (In another implementation, the Provider may price offerings and make them available to an intermediary Distributor entity, who may provide them to a Purchaser market and interface with Purchasers for offer purchases and exercises.)) Claim 10: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 1 above. Tran further teaches: at least one processor is further configured to execute the instructions to: receive a request to redeem the non-fungible token from the device via the communications interface, the request comprising the non-fungible token; based on a verified ownership interest in the asset and on a determined availability of the non-fungible token, generate a hash value representative of at least a portion of the non-fungible token, and perform operations that record the hash value and information characterizing the non-fungible token within an additional element of a distributed ledger; and (See Tran, Par. 376 (In one embodiment, the blockchain address is used to replace the databases holding registration information for trademarks, patents, designs and copyright. By registering IP rights on a distributed ledger, the IP provides smart intellectual property rights, providing a robust and trustworthy proof of record.)) perform operations that provision encrypted data to the computing system, the computing system being configured to decrypt the encrypted data and perform operations that trigger a release of documentation data associated with the ownership interest. (See Tran, Par. 138 (The service or item is not restricted to a media item and may be any item capable of being embedded with any form of data for the purpose of monitoring third party access to the service or item. The service or item may be a physical item such as a book, a compact disc, a physical document, or a work of art, an electronic item such as digital media, a biological item such as a genetic sequence or biological matter, or any other item capable of being embedded with data.)) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tran et al., US 2021/0256070 A1, (“Tran”), in view of Gagne-Keats et al., US 2024/0064019 A1, (“Gagne-Keats”). Claim 8: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 5 above. Tran does not expressly disclose, however, Gagne-Keats teaches: the digital representation comprises a three-dimensional graphical representation of the tangible asset; and the executed application program causes the device is configured to present the three-dimensional graphical representation of the tangible asset within an interactive digital environment. (See Gagne-Keats, Par. 24 (For example, the first user can click on a graphical representation of the non-fungible physical asset 202 in the metaverse to present whether the graphical representation of the nonfungible physical asset 202 is linked to the NFT 203.)) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine with the teachings of Tran discussed above, a step where an application program causes the device is configured to present the three-dimensional graphical representation of the tangible asset within an interactive digital environment, as taught by Gagne-Keats. Tran teaches a device to securely access a digital asset with an asset blockchain address on a blockchain. It would be obvious for Tran as part of his system to include a step where an application program causes the device is configured to present the three-dimensional graphical representation of the tangible asset within an interactive digital environment so as to effectively present the asset in an interactive digital environment. Tran’s device to securely access a digital asset with an asset blockchain address on a blockchain and Gagne-Keats’ step for presenting the three-dimensional graphical representation of the tangible asset within an interactive digital environment, and in the combination each element would have performed the same function it performed separately, one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tran et al., US 2021/0256070 A1, (“Tran”), in view of Regenor, US 2022/0351165 A1, (“Regenor”). Claim 9: Tran teaches each and every element of Claim 5 above. Tran does not expressly disclose, however, Regenor teaches: the information characterizing the non-fungible token comprises an alphanumeric identifier of the non-fungible token. (See Regenor, Par. 42 (In one embodiment, the token may include a 64-bit alphanumeric code that is sectioned into individual code segments where one or more or all of the code segments of the alphanumeric code may express data indicative of attributes of the physical asset or asset location or ownership.)) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine with the teachings of Tran discussed above, a step for characterizing the non-fungible token with an alphanumeric identifier, as taught by Regenor. Tran teaches a device to securely access a digital asset with an asset blockchain address on a blockchain. It would be obvious for Tran as part of his system to include a step characterizing the non-fungible token with an alphanumeric identifier so as to more effectively identify the asset. Tran’s device to securely access a digital asset with an asset blockchain address on a blockchain and Regenor’s step for characterizing the non-fungible token with an alphanumeric identifier, and in the combination each element would have performed the same function it performed separately, one having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention would have recognized that the results of the combination were predictable. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GEORGE PROIOS whose telephone number is (571)272-4573. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bennett M Sigmond can be reached on 303-297-4411. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GEORGE N. PROIOS/Examiner, Art Unit 3694 /BENNETT M SIGMOND/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3694
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12646113
Method and System for Trading Assets and Their Carbon Footprint Status
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12619960
OPTIMIZING LEDGER USAGE AND LIQUIDATION OPERATIONS THEREON
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12614159
Systems And Methods For Decreasing Counterparty Settlement Risk
3y 11m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12602692
Systems And Methods For Decreasing Counterparty Settlement Risk
2y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12579410
TECHNIQUES FOR DATA PROCESSING PREDICTIONS
3y 4m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+32.7%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 186 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month