Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/856,364

VARIABLE BRANCH ARTIFICIAL TREE AND METHODS OF ASSEMBLING

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 14, 2022 — provisional 63/363,009 +1 more
Examiner
MULVANEY, ELIZABETH EVANS
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Belgravia Wood Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
876 granted / 1114 resolved
+18.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1128
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1114 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/11/24 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Both claims 3 and 17 repeat the limitations of the previous claims, i.e. they do not further limit the claims from which they depend. Claim 10 recites the limitation "the third elevation" in line 20. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. “Third location” in line 4 should be “third elevation”. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US 4,573,102 (NORWOOD). Regarding claims 1, 10 and 15: The reference discloses a variable branch artificial tree and method of assembling the tree where the tree comprises multiple removable branches having at least one twig member, each branch has a connector, and multiple branch receptacles are provided on a trunk where the branch receptacles are near each other but at different heights on the trunk. See Figures 1 and 4-6. Regarding claims 2-4, 11-12 and 16-17: The tree may have a plurality of branches. See Figure 1. While there are only four branches shown, the Figure only shows the bottom of the tree. Regarding claims 5-9: The branches have light strings thereon which are electrically connected to the trunk via plugs. See Figures 4-6 and claim 1. Regarding claims 13-14: The distances between the branch receptacles is varied. See Figure 1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ELIZABETH EVANS MULVANEY whose telephone number is (571)272-1527. The examiner can normally be reached 8am-4:30pm M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Ruthkosky can be reached at 571-272-1291. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ELIZABETH E MULVANEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679064
METHOD, MACHINERY, DECORATIVE FILM AND EMBOSSABLE FORMULATION TO DECORATE AND EMBOSS A MATERIAL
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680316
SPORTS FLOORING IN TILE OR PLANK FORM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680193
SiC WAFER AND SiC EPITAXIAL WAFER
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676318
AUXILIARY FILM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676406
RADOME ILLUMINATED GRILLE
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 2m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1114 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month