Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/856,376

METHOD, DEVICE AND COMPUTER STORAGE MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Apr 15, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022086995
Examiner
JAGANNATHAN, MELANIE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
673 granted / 777 resolved
+26.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +5% lift
Without
With
+4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
795
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 777 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-18, 25, 48 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Beluri et al. US 20250038816. Regarding claim 1, A method of communication, comprising: determining, at a terminal device (wireless transmit/receive unit, WTRU, Figure 1B, a WTRU configured to perform Al/ML-based CSI compression for CSI feedback reporting, para. 0092), channel state information based on a measurement on a set of reference signals from a network device (the WTRU can select one or more pre-processing type(s) based on whether a data processing model at the WTRU supports the pre-processing type(s) and can receive one or more configured reference signal(s) and perform CSI measurements, para. 0251), for example using the configured reference signals); determining a compression method based on a configuration from a network device, the configuration comprising at least one of the following: a time-domain parameter, a frequency-domain parameter, or a spatial-domain parameter (the WTRU may determine to use the spatial-domain, frequency-domain, and/or time-domain pre-processing of the CSI, the WTRU may be configured by the gNB, Figure 1A, element 114, with a combination or order of dimensions in the frequency, time, and/or spatial domain on which the WTRU may perform pre-processing, para. 0200, 0242); compressing the channel state information based on the compression method; and transmitting, to the network device, the compressed channel state information (the WTRU may pre-process the measured CSI using the selected pre-processing type and the WTRU generates compressed CSI by compressing the pre-processed CSI using the configured data processing model compatible with the pre-processing type and then report the compressed CSI to the gNB, para. 0251). Regarding claim 2, The method of claim 1, wherein the channel state information comprises at least information of a precoding matrix (CSI may include channel quality index (CQI); rank indicator (RI); precoding matrix index (PMI), para. 0099). Regarding claim 3, The method of claim 1, wherein the compression method is an artificial intelligence or machine learning based compression comprising at least an encoding part of an autoencoder or a transformer (the WTRU may receive configuration information that indicates a reference signal and a data processing model such as AI NN encoder model for channel state information compression, para. 0004, Figure 6, for artificial intelligence (AI)/ML capable WTRUs configured for AI/ML-based CSI compression, the WTRU complexity can utilize a AI NN encoder model or AI NN encoder and the WTRU may select to pre-process the CSI measurement(s) submitted to the AI NN encoder input, para. 0088). Regarding claim 4, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression parameter values based on at least one of the following: a mapping between a value of the time-domain parameter and at least one compression parameter value in the set of compression parameter values, or a mapping among at least two compression parameter values in the set of compression parameter values (the WTRU may be configured with parameters associated with one or more AI NN encoders and the parameters may include model training information, the WTRU may be configured with frequency domain training data, angle-delay domain training data, time domain training data, and/or spatial domain training data, para. 0164, the WTRU supports Al/ML NN encoder-based CSI compression and CSI compression configuration may include the size of the NN encoder model and/or the compression ratio, the WTRU performs channel measurements for explicit CSI reporting, para. 0280). Regarding claim 5, The method of claim 1, wherein the time-domain parameter comprises at least one of the following: a periodicity of the set of reference signals, a periodicity of the transmission of the compressed channel state information, a time interval between two transmission occasions of the set of reference signals, a time interval between two transmissions of the compressed channel state information, a time-domain density, or a restriction for the measurement (for the time domain, the WTRU may perform measurements of the radio link interfaces and report the measurements to determine the periodicity to send reference signals for the WTRU to do channel estimation, changes in reporting frequency and/or periodicity/offset may be triggered by detection of errors in CSI compression and the AI NN encoder can be trained, para. 0275). Regarding claim 6, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression methods based on the time-domain parameter; and determining the compression method from the set of compression methods (pre-processing types may include one or more of the following: frequency domain; time domain; spatial domain; or linear transformation of the channel matrix H, for example, to convert to the angular-delay domain, para. 0136, a pre-processing type may be applicable to one or more of the supported AI NN encoder models and an AI NN encoder model may use multiple pre-processing types, para. 0283). Regarding claim 7. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: in accordance with a determination that a value of the time-domain parameter is below a first threshold value, determining a first predetermined compression method as the compression method; in accordance with a determination that a value of the time-domain parameter is below a second threshold value, determining that no compression is applied; or in accordance with a determination that a value of the time-domain parameter is above a third threshold value, determining a second predetermined compression method as the compression method (a parameter may include a threshold value which is compared to a measurement performed by the WTRU , the parameter can include a dimension and/or a value to be used by the WTRU in the application of the pre-processing type and include an applicable or associated AI NN encoder, such as an AI NN encoder associated with a pre-processing type, para. 0150, the parameter may be associated with pre-processing types using time domain pre-processing, the WTRU can compare the measured coherence time value to the coherence time threshold, a measured coherence time value below the coherence time threshold may indicate a fast fading channel and a measured coherence time value above the coherence time threshold may indicate a slow fading channel, selection of a pre-processing type may be based, at least in part, on the comparison of the coherence time value to the coherence time threshold, para. 0151). Regarding claim 8, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression methods based on the time-domain parameter (a parameter may be associated with pre-processing types using time domain pre-processing, the WTRU can compare the measured coherence time value to the coherence time threshold, a measured coherence time value below the coherence time threshold may indicate a fast fading channel and a measured coherence time value above the coherence time threshold may indicate a slow fading channel, selection of a pre-processing type may be based, at least in part, on the comparison of the coherence time value to the coherence time threshold, para. 0151). Regarding claim 9, The method of claim 8, wherein compressing the channel state information comprises: applying a first compression method in the set of compression methods for a first time- domain behavior; and applying a second compression method in the set of compression methods for a second time-domain behavior (a parameter may be associated with pre-processing types using time domain pre-processing, the WTRU can compare the measured coherence time value to the coherence time threshold, a measured coherence time value below the coherence time threshold may indicate a fast fading channel and a measured coherence time value above the coherence time threshold may indicate a slow fading channel, selection of a pre-processing type may be based, at least in part, on the comparison of the coherence time value to the coherence time threshold, para. 0151). Regarding claim 10, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression parameter values based on at least one of the following: a mapping between a value of the frequency-domain parameter and at least one compression parameter value in the set of compression parameter values, a mapping among at least two compression parameter values in the set of compression parameter values, or a mapping among at least two frequency-domain parameter values in a set of frequency- domain parameter values (the WTRU may be configured with parameters associated with one or more AI NN encoders and the parameters may include model training information, the WTRU may be configured with frequency domain training data, angle-delay domain training data, time domain training data, and/or spatial domain training data, para. 0164, the WTRU supports Al/ML NN encoder-based CSI compression and CSI compression configuration may include the size of the NN encoder model and/or the compression ratio, the WTRU performs channel measurements for explicit CSI reporting, para. 0280). Regarding claim 11, The method of claim 1, wherein the frequency-domain parameter comprises at least one of the following: a size of a sub-band, the number of sub-bands, a bandwidth for the measurement, the number of physical resource blocks, or a frequency-domain density (for frequency domain pre-processing, the WTRU may select to average CSI-RS over every n number of RBs, with the value of n depending on channel conditions related to channel coherence bandwidth; previous channel measurements, frequency correlation coefficients, para. 0274, the WTRU may perform measurements for frequency domain pre-processing to determine the channel coherence bandwidth and may determine the number of CSI such as channel frequency response samples that may be averaged or down-sampled) in a frequency domain, para. 0093). Regarding claim 12, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression methods based on the frequency-domain parameter; and determining the compression method from the set of compression methods (an AI NN encoder model may use multiple pre-processing types, the CSI report configuration may include the maximum number of CSI bits to be reported by the WTRU for the selected configuration and include the minimum compression quality expected by the gNB, the WTRU may perform channel measurements for explicit CSI reporting, such as the channel response matrix for all Tx antenna ports and Rx antennas, at different granularities in frequency domain, the WTRU may select the frequency-domain pre-processing if the measured channel coherence BW is large and above a threshold, para. 0283). Regarding claim 13, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: in accordance with a determination that a value of the frequency-domain parameter is below a fourth threshold value, determining a third predetermined compression method as the compression method; in accordance with a determination that a value of the frequency-domain parameter is below a fifth threshold value, determining that no compression is applied; or in accordance with a determination that a value of the frequency-domain parameter is above a sixth threshold value, determining a fourth predetermined compression method as the compression method (an AI NN encoder model may use multiple pre-processing types, the CSI report configuration may include the maximum number of CSI bits to be reported by the WTRU for the selected configuration and include the minimum compression quality expected by the gNB, the WTRU may perform channel measurements for explicit CSI reporting, such as the channel response matrix for all Tx antenna ports and Rx antennas, at different granularities in frequency domain, the WTRU may select the frequency-domain pre-processing if the measured channel coherence BW is large and above a threshold, para. 0283). Regarding claim 14, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression methods based on the frequency-domain parameter (a parameter may include a threshold value which is compared to a measurement performed by the WTRU , the parameter can include a dimension and/or a value to be used by the WTRU in the application of the pre-processing type and include an applicable or associated AI NN encoder, such as an AI NN encoder associated with a pre-processing type, para. 0150, a parameter may be associated with pre-processing types using frequency domain pre-processing, a WTRU may compare a measured coherence BW to the coherence BW threshold, the WTRU may determine whether a channel is flat or frequency-selective, a measured coherence BW value greater than the coherence BW threshold may indicate a flat fading channel, a measured coherence BW value lower than the coherence BW threshold may indicate a frequency-selective channel, para. 0151, para. 0171-0172). Regarding claim 15, The method of claim 14, wherein compressing the channel state information comprises: applying a third compression method in the set of compression methods for a first value of the frequency-domain parameter; and applying a fourth compression method in the set of compression methods for a second value of the frequency-domain parameter (a parameter may be associated with pre-processing types using frequency domain pre-processing, a WTRU may compare a measured coherence BW to the coherence BW threshold, the WTRU may determine whether a channel is flat or frequency-selective, a measured coherence BW value greater than the coherence BW threshold may indicate a flat fading channel, a measured coherence BW value lower than the coherence BW threshold may indicate a frequency-selective channel, para. 0151, para. 0171-0172). Regarding claim 16, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression parameter values based on at least one of the following: a mapping between a value of the spatial-domain parameter and at least one compression parameter value in the set of compression parameter values, or a mapping among at least two compression parameter values in the set of compression parameter values (a set of parameters may include a number of layers, an input dimension, an output dimension, a number of iterations, an input type, an output type, a parameter can also be a spatial domain correlation threshold, the parameter may be associated with pre-processing types using spatial domain pre-processing, the WTRU may determine the spatial domain correlation and compare the measured spatial domain correlation to the spatial domain correlation threshold and determine the level of spatial domain correlation based on the comparison, selection of a pre-processing type may be based, at least in part, on the level of spatial domain correlation, para. 0152). Regarding claim 17, The method of claim 1, wherein the spatial-domain parameter comprises at least one of the following: the number of antenna ports, the number of panels, an oversampling factor, the number of beams for linear combination, the number of phase quantization bits, the number of beams, a codebook type, an antenna structure, or polarizations (a set of spatial domain parameters may include a number of layers, an input dimension, an output dimension, a number of iterations, an input type, an output type, para. 0152, number of input values in one or more dimensions such as number of transmit antennas, number of receive antennas, number of sub-bands/subcarrier spacings, para. 0256). Regarding claim 18, The method of claim 1, wherein determining the compression method comprises: determining a set of compression methods based on the spatial-domain parameter; and determining the compression method from the set of compression methods (the WTRU may determine the spatial domain correlation and compare the measured spatial domain correlation to the spatial domain correlation threshold and determine the level of spatial domain correlation based on the comparison, selection of a pre-processing type may be based, at least in part, on the level of spatial domain correlation, para. 0152). Regarding claim 25, A method of communication, comprising: transmitting, at a network device and to a terminal device, a configuration comprising at least one of the following: a time-domain parameter, a frequency-domain parameter, or a spatial-domain parameter (the WTRU may determine to use the spatial-domain, frequency-domain, and/or time-domain pre-processing of the CSI, the WTRU may be configured by the gNB, Figure 1A, element 114, with a combination or order of dimensions in the frequency, time, and/or spatial domain on which the WTRU may perform pre-processing, para. 0200, 0242); receiving compressed channel state information from the terminal device (the WTRU may pre-process the measured CSI using the selected pre-processing type and the WTRU generates compressed CSI by compressing the pre-processed CSI using the configured data processing model compatible with the pre-processing type and then report the compressed CSI to the gNB, para. 0251); determining a compression method applied for the compressed channel state information based on the configuration (the WTRU may send an indication of the selected pre-processing type and/or the selected pre-processing parameters to the gNB, para. 0251); and recovering channel state information based on the compressed channel state information and the compression method (the gNB may perform an inverse operation using an AI NN decoder to reconstruct the original CSI from the received compressed CSI, the AI NN encoder and decoder of an autoencoder may be jointly trained, para. 0111). Claim 48 is rejected under the same rationale. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, some of which are described below: Zhang et al. US 20260172095 discloses performing CSI feedback based on AI/ML module which includes an AI/ML-based CSI generation part and an AI/ML-based CSI reconstruction part, the AI/ML-based CSI generation part includes an AI/ML model, the AI/ML model may include an AI/ML encoder and a quantizer, and a preprocessing module, a AI/ML-based CSI reconstruction part includes an AI/ML reconstruction model, the AI/ML reconstruction model includes a dequantizer and an AI/ML decoder. Hindy et al. US 20260095222 discloses supports a UE performing efficient channel state information (CSI) measurement and/or reporting for multiple spatial domain adaptations of a network by facilitating signaling of antenna ports associated with the multiple spatial domain adaptation patterns employed by the network, which enables the UE to generate CSI reports that include information for the antenna ports. Kim et al. US 20240313919 discloses performing CSI report by a UE by receiving, from a base station, configuration information on the channel state information report; receiving, from the base station, at least one channel state information-reference signal (CSI-RS) based on the configuration information; and transmitting, to the base station, CSI calculated based on the at least one CSI-RS and priority-related information for omission of the corresponding CSI. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MELANIE JAGANNATHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-3163. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marcus Smith can be reached at 571-270-1096. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MELANIE JAGANNATHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2468
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707323
METHOD AND DEVICE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701086
ESTABLISHING CONNECTIONS IN A COMPUTER NETWORK
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701625
FORCING MOBILE DEVICE WIRELESS NETWORK RECONNECTION
2y 12m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12689947
TECHNIQUES FOR DATA TRANSFER USING BANDWIDTH PARTS FOR WIRELESS ACCESS
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12690034
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPEN LOOP POWER CONTROL OF UPLINK CG PUSCH, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+4.7%)
2y 11m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 777 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month