Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/856,429

METHOD OF MANUFACTURING LOW-COST AND HIGH-STRENGTH THERMOELECTRIC MODULE WITH SIMPLIFIED MANUFACTURING PROCESS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 11, 2024
Priority
Oct 11, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0135126 +1 more
Examiner
KANG, TAE-SIK
Art Unit
1728
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Rmaterials Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
330 granted / 568 resolved
-6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
598
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 568 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Examiner’s Notes The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112: (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites multiple “the diffusion barrier”. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this office action, the recitation will be treated as if it recites “the tunnel diffusion barrier”. All claims which depend on clam 1 are rejected by virtue of dependency. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1 recites “the through hole (111)” in line 20. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this office action, the recitation will be treated as if it recites “the through holes (111)”. All claims which depend on clam 1 are rejected by virtue of dependency. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1 recites “a thermoelectric module” in lines 21-22. It is unclear whether the claimed “a thermoelectric module” is identical to or a different feature from the claimed “a low-cost and high-strength thermoelectric module” in lines 1-2. All claims which depend on clam 1 are rejected by virtue of dependency. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2 recites “the through hole (111)” in line 13. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. For the purpose of this office action, the recitation will be treated as if it recites “the through holes (111)”. All claims which depend on clam 2 are rejected by virtue of dependency. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 2 recites “a predetermined pressure” in line 17. It is unclear whether the claimed “a predetermined pressure” is identical to or a different feature from the claimed “a predetermined pressure” in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 3 recites “a predetermined pressure” in line 18. It is unclear whether the claimed “a predetermined pressure” is identical to or a different feature from the claimed “a predetermined pressure” in claim 1. Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-5 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: the prior art taken alone or in combination fails to anticipate or fairly suggest the limitations of the claims, in such a manner that a rejection under 35 USC 102 or 103 would be proper. The prior art fails to teach a combination of all the claimed features as presented in independent claim 1. Regarding claim 1, A closest prior art, WATANABE (JP 2003174202 A, see English Machine Translation) teaches a method of manufacturing a thermoelectric device, the method comprising: a support (see the substrate 60), a plurality of through holes (see the pores 62a) are formed which can fill thermoelectric powder with a p-type thermoelectric powder and an n-type thermoelectric powder (see Fig. 2; [0038] the pores 62a on one side are filled with n-type (or p-type) thermoelectric material 64a, and the pores 62b on the opposite side are filled with p-type (or n-type) thermoelectric material 64b (a)), sintering a p-type thermoelectric powder and an n-type thermoelectric powder the p-type thermoelectric powder and the n-type thermoelectric powder ([0028] By sintering the thermoelectric materials 64a and 64b filled in the mold 60a together with the mold 60a, n-type and p-type thermoelectric elements are formed in the pores 62a and 62b), mounting ceramic substrates ([0036] ceramic substrates such as SiC and Si3N4, metallic materials such as AlFe8, Fe, and FeNi, and quartz or quartz-based glass can also be used, and these can also be selectively etched). But, the prior art fails to explicitly teach a combination of all the claimed features including “a lower metal thin film punching operation (S110) of covering an upper surface of a support (110), in which a plurality of through holes (111) are formed to form a tunnel diffusion barrier, with a metal thin film (130) for the diffusion barrier and punching and inserting the metal thin film (130) for the diffusion barrier to match a size of each of the through holes (111); an upper metal thin film punching operation (S130) of covering the upper surface of the support (110) with the metal thin film (130) for the diffusion barrier and punching and inserting the metal thin film (130) for the diffusion barrier to match the size of each of the through holes (111)”, as claimed. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TAE-SIK KANG whose telephone number is 571-272-3190. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00am – 5:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew T. Martin can be reached on 571-270-7871. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TAE-SIK KANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1728
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740322
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THERMOELECTRIC DEVICES WITH INSULATORS
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733265
BACK CONTACT SOLAR CELL, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE
1y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12713734
SOLAR CELL AND PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706564
CONNECTION SOCKET SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCT, SOLAR MODULE SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCT, SOLAR MODULE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A SOLAR MODULE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690390
THERMOELECTRIC MODULE AND POWER GENERATION DEVICE INCLUDING SAME
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+27.8%)
2y 10m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 568 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month