Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/856,719

LOWER VEHICLE BODY FRAME ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 14, 2024
Priority
Apr 17, 2022 — CN 202210400700.4 +1 more
Examiner
DOUGLAS, STEVEN O
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
BEIJING CHEHEJIA AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
1255 granted / 1585 resolved
+19.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1599
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
§103
32.0%
-8.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1585 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 13-16 and 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by BYD Co (CN109204496). The BYD Co reference discloses a lower vehicle body frame (see Figures 1 and 2) comprising a frame body (proximate reference numeral 500 in Figure 2), a footrest plate 300 and a rear cross beam 250, as claimed. In regard to claims 2-4 and 16, see side-impact cross beams 500 and front cross beam 210. In regard to claim 5, see coupling projection (240,250). In regard to claim 6, see muti-row cross beams in Figure 2. In regard to claim 13, see torsion box proximate reference numeral 300A in Figure 1. In regard to claim 14, see Figure 2. In regard to claim 15, see front-row small longitudinal beam 220 in Figure 2. In regard to claim 18, any battery associated with the vehicle mounted to the frame would inherently dissipate any heat through the frame mounted thereto. In regard to claims 19 and 20, the actual vehicle is not shown and and the front engine compartment would be proximate reference numeral 100 in Figure 2 Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The Kanazawa et al. and Toba references pertain to various vehicle body frames that accommodate footrests similar to that of Applicant’s. Claims 7-12 and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art of record, with the applied BYD Co. reference being the closest prior art device, alone or in combination, teach Applicant’s invention of at least a lower vehicle body frame assembly inclusive of details regarding a side longitudinal beam and a sill beam with a first portion coupled to the side longitudinal beam, a side-impact cross beam and a rear cross beam, and a second portion detachably coupled a side of the first portion away from a side longitudinal beam, as claimed. To modify the closest prior art device to have such features would involve teachings gleaned only from the instant application for patent. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEVEN O DOUGLAS whose telephone number is (571)272-4885. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 5:30-4:00 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEVEN O DOUGLAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 14, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12767031
FRAME FOR A VEHICLE
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12767241
AUTOMOBILE BODY
2y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12746977
HOOD FOR VEHICLE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741514
VEHICLE CARGO SPACE ACCESS PROVIDING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741698
HARDPOINT CONNECTORS FOR COMPOSITE TRUCK BODY FLOORS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+11.2%)
3y 0m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1585 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month