Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/856,936

CONTROL BOARD, CONTROL SYSTEM, CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Examiner
DANG, PHONG H
Art Unit
2184
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
283 granted / 353 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
377
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 353 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/15/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment The Preliminary Amendment, filed 10/15/2024 has been entered. Claim 10 has been canceled. Claims 11-13 have been added. Claims 1-9 and 11-13 are pending in the Application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9, and 11-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Carpenter et al US 20110126005. Regarding claim 1, Carpenter teaches a control board configured to be mounted in a vehicle (see figure 4, host 400, see para 0137, connection of a host mobile phone to an accessory car dock e.g. mounted in a vehicle) and capable of rewriting a circuit configuration (see the abstract, The host device can select connector functions to be enabled for connecting to the accessory device connector), the control board comprising: a connector to which is connected a second end of a cable having a first end connected to a component mounted in the vehicle, the second end being located opposite to the first end (see figure 4, connector 420, also see figure 2 and para 0043, FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an exemplary host 200 connected to an exemplary accessory 250 via a cable); and a control unit configured to perform control of the component (controller 410), wherein the control unit is configured to obtain, based on component information transmitted from the component via the cable, wiring data relating to an arrangement of a plurality of pins included in the connector, and a control program for controlling the component (see para 0081, the accessory device can send accessory device information e.g. component information to the host device that includes information in addition to the functions supported by the accessory connector e.g. wiring data, also see para 0083, The accessory device information can also include application information e.g. control program). Regarding claim 2, Carpenter further teaches the component information includes the control program and the wiring data (see para 0081, the accessory device can send accessory device information e.g. component information to the host device that includes information in addition to the functions supported by the accessory connector e.g. wiring data, also see para 0083, The accessory device information can also include application information e.g. control program). Regarding claim 3, Carpenter further teaches the component information includes identification information for identifying the component (see para 0108, The accessory device information can further include the authentication version, an accessory device unique identifier (e.g., the accessory device globally unique identifier), and accessory device class and sub-class), and the control unit is configured to: transmit, via a network, the component information to an external device installed outside the vehicle (see para 0100, The host and accessory devices can each have access to a resource that can determine whether a received certificate is associated with an approved device. This resource can be a certificate database stored locally at the host or accessory device or accessible remotely via a network connection. The resource can be an algorithm that takes the received certificate as input and produces an indication of whether the certificate is associated with an approved or genuine device); and obtain, based on the identification information, the control program transmitted from the external device (see para 0139, firmware or software upgrades are available for download over the network, also see para 0050, after configuring the host device connector pins, the host device can load the necessary drivers to support the enabled connector functions. The drivers can be downloaded from a remote resource). Regarding claim 4, Carpenter further teaches the control unit is configured to obtain, based on the identification information, the wiring data transmitted from the external device (see para 0048, Information regarding the accessory connector functions can be received from the accessory or another source, and can be stored at the host device). Regarding claim 5, Carpenter further teaches the control unit is configured to rewrite, based on the wiring data, the arrangement of the plurality of pins to an arrangement for controlling the component (see para 0066, an indication of one or more functions supported by the second accessory connector can be received from the second accessory… the host device can reconfigure the pins of the host connection to support the selected second functions), and thereafter perform control of the component based on the control program (see para 0050, after configuring the host device connector pins, the host device can load the necessary drivers to support the enabled connector functions. The drivers can be loaded from the host device store 230, or downloaded from a remote resource connected to the host device over a network). Regarding claim 6, Carpenter further teaches the control unit is configured to, when the first end is removed from the component, or when the second end is removed from the connector, return the arrangement of the plurality of pins to a state that existed prior to execution of the rewriting based on the wiring data (see para 0067, placing the host connector in an unconfigured or a previously configured state in response to detecting the first accessory device being detached from the host device). Regarding claim 7, Carpenter further teaches the control unit is configured to, when the first end is removed from the component, or when the second end is removed from the connector, delete the control program from the control board (see para 0113, After initiation of the removal process, the Remove Accessory scenario can perform the following. The host device can issue appropriate notifications to host device applications communicating with the accessory device. Once these host device applications have completed executing, the host can stop the software device drivers and corresponding bus protocol stacks, the Examiner further submits that program such as driver can be deleted when no longer needed). Regarding claim 8, Carpenter further teaches a control system (see figure 2) comprising: the control board according to claim 1 (host 200); the cable (cable M, N); and the component (accessory 250). Regarding claim 9, Carpenter teaches a control method of a control board configured to be mounted in a vehicle (see figure 4, host 400, see para 0137, connection of a host mobile phone to an accessory car dock e.g. mounted in a vehicle) and capable of rewriting a circuit configuration (see the abstract, The host device can select connector functions to be enabled for connecting to the accessory device connector), the method comprising the steps of: receiving, when a component mounted in the vehicle and the control board are connected to each other using a cable, component information transmitted to the control board from the component via the cable (see para 0081, the accessory device can send accessory device information e.g. component information to the host device); and obtaining, based on the component information, wiring data relating to an arrangement of a plurality of pins that are included in the control board and are connected to the cable, and a control program for controlling the component (see para 0081, the accessory device can send accessory device information e.g. component information to the host device that includes information in addition to the functions supported by the accessory connector e.g. wiring data, also see para 0083, The accessory device information can also include application information e.g. control program). Regarding claims 11-13, please refer to the rejection of claim 5 since the claimed subject matter is substantially similar. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lovegrove US 20220129404 discloses updating a connector’s pins arrangement Akamine et al US 20080178134 discloses receiving circuit information/layout data and extracting network parameters from the received information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHONG H DANG whose telephone number is (571)272-0470. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30AM - 6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Henry Tsai can be reached at (571)272-4176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHONG H DANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2184
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596657
NETWORK INSTANTIATED PERIPHERAL DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596671
PRECISION TIMING ACROSS PCIe CEM NICS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591536
USER MODE DIRECT DATA ACCESS TO NON-VOLATILE MEMORY EXPRESS DEVICE VIA KERNEL-MANAGED QUEUE PAIR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12580844
NETWORK MULTICASTING USING ALTERNATE SETS OF DIRECTIVES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579088
SEMI-POLLING INPUT/OUTPUT COMPLETION MODE FOR NON-VOLATILE MEMORY EXPRESS COMPLETION QUEUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+10.4%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 353 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month