Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/857,086

MODE CONVERSION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Examiner
PERENY, TYLER J
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allow Rate
154 granted / 162 resolved
+27.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
187
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
57.3%
+17.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 162 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kawamura (US 2016/0126610 A1) in view of Herbsommer et al. (US 9,405,064 B2), hereinafter Herb. Regarding claim 1, Kawamura discloses, in figure 1, a mode transition structure, comprising: a first dielectric substrate that includes a microstrip line including a line conductor and a first ground conductor facing the line conductor and that has a first thickness (Para [0055], “microstrip line 10 is formed such that a strip-shaped main conductor 12 is patterned on one surface of a dielectric substrate 11 from one end to the other end, the other surface is covered with a ground conductor 13”); and a second dielectric substrate that has a second thickness larger than the first thickness (second dielectric substrate formed by waveguide 20 comprised of metal walls 22a to 22d has a second thickness larger than the first thickness of the first dielectric substrate), but fails to disclose a second dielectric substrate that includes a post-wall waveguide including a first conductor layer connected to the line conductor on a same plane and a second conductor layer facing the first conductor layer; and a first via that electrically connects the first ground conductor and the second conductor layer to each other. However, Herb discloses, in figure 10 & 12, a second dielectric substrate that includes a post-wall waveguide (Col. 13, Lines 24-26, “metal waveguide 322 in which the core 310-C of the dielectric waveguide 204-C extends…part of PCB 202-C”) including a first conductor layer connected to the line conductor on a same plane and a second conductor layer facing the first conductor layer (first conductor layer 404 is connected to microstrip line conductor 320-1 on a same plane and includes a second conductor layer 402 facing the first conductor layer 404); and a first via that electrically connects the first ground conductor and the second conductor layer to each other (Col. 13, Lines 40-43, “vias 408 are shown in this example as extended between plate 402 and ground plane 308-C so that plates 402 and 404 and ground plane 308-C are electrically coupled together”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to include the structure of Herb in the mode transition structure of Kawamura, to achieve the benefit of achieving a desired coupling while incorporating improved impedance matching between the microstrip and waveguide structures (Herb, Col. 13, Lines 25-40). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYLER J PERENY whose telephone number is (571)272-4189. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lincoln Donovan can be reached at 571-272-1988. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TYLER J PERENY/ Examiner, Art Unit 2842
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597688
PHASE SHIFTERS WITH LOW AMPLITUDE VARIATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597905
IMPEDANCE MATCHING NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592679
MULTIPLEXER, RADIO-FREQUENCY MODULE, AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587167
HIGH QUALITY FACTOR SAW RESONATORS WITH SHARED REFLECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586881
MULTILAYERED FILTER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+5.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 162 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month