Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 18/857,201

CLEANING BOOSTER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 16, 2024
Priority
Jun 17, 2022 — provisional 63/353,031 +1 more
Examiner
BOYER, CHARLES I
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Rohm And Haas Company
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allowance Rate
786 granted / 1117 resolved
+5.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
1168
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
49.6%
+9.6% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1117 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of the species wherein formula I is according to formula (la) and R¹ is according to formula (IV) in the reply filed on July 29, 2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wilson et al, US 5,733,858. Wilson et al teach a liquid laundry detergent comprising a polyamino disuccinic acid (col. 3, lines 1-10) wherein the polyamino disuccinic acid may be 1,6-hexamethylenediamine-N,N-disuccinic acid (corresponds to the compound of formula (I) wherein A1 is - (CH2)6-, R1 is of formula (IV) wherein R2 is HO-* meaning formula (V) wherein c=0 and R3=H) (col. 4, line 29) and so it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to formulate a liquid laundry detergent comprising hexamethylenediamine-N,N-disuccinic acid with confidence of forming an effective liquid detergent as this is taught as a suitable component of the invention. Claims 1, 2, and 6-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Koehler et al, CA 2,511,935. Koehler et al teach a coating composition comprising a polyaspartic acid ester according to formula I where X is an alkyl radical of 6, n is 2, A and A’ are methyl, and l and m add to at least 2 (page 3, formula I), which corresponds to the compound of formula (I) wherein A1 is - (CH2)6-, R1 is of formula (IV) wherein R2 is ethoxy, meaning formula (V) wherein c=1 and R3=H. It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to formulate a compound according to formula I of the reference as this compound is contemplated by the reference. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The examiner notes that hexamethylenediamine-N,N-disuccinic acid is a well-known compound. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES I BOYER whose telephone number is (571)272-1311. The examiner can normally be reached M-S 10-430. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at 5712722817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLES I BOYER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 16, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12753370
SURFACE TREATING FORMULATION AND METHOD OF MAKING AND USING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12753375
INSULATING CLEANER COMPOSITION FOR HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICITY AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT FOR PREVENTING ELECTRICAL FIRES WITH POWER ON
2y 2m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12747408
LIQUID DATEM COMPOSITIONS
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747414
Tank Cleansing of Auxinic Herbicides
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747417
AMBIENT MOISTURE-ACTIVATED HARD SURFACE TREATMENT POWDER
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+19.7%)
2y 4m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1117 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month