Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/858,006

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 18, 2024
Priority
Apr 24, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022088810
Examiner
CHANG, KAI J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
310 granted / 422 resolved
+13.5% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
429
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§103
65.0%
+25.0% vs TC avg
§102
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 422 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged with the benefit of an earlier filing date of April 24, 2022 for PCT/CN2022/088810. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on October 18, 2024 and June 23, 2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 – 12, and 15 – 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chuanfeng He (US Patent Application Publication 2024/0349192), and further in view of Kumar et al (US Patent Application Publication 2022/0417853). Hereinafter He and Kumar. Regarding claim 1, He discloses a wireless communication method, wherein the method is performed by a terminal, and the method comprises: waking up a second type transceiver through a first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving a wakeup signal (the terminal device includes transceiver module that receives a first wake-up signal or a second wake-up signal based on at least one of a predetermined rule, a DRX state, indication information, or a current state of the terminal device, wherein the first wake-up signal is carried over a WUR signal, and the second wake-up signal is not carried over the WUR signal, paragraph [0126]; UE includes wake-up receiver that receives the energy saving signal, where a primary receiver of the UE is turned on by the wake-up signal, paragraphs [0049], [0073]; the wake-up receiver is “first type” and primary receiver is the “second type”). While He teaches the UE receiving the first wake-up signal in the wake-up signal receiving method 1 (i.e. wake-up receiver), starting timer immediately or upon a time period in response to receiving the first wake-up signal, and receives the second wake-up signal during the operation of the timer in the wake-up signal receiving method 2 (i.e. primary receiver), where the UE receives the control/data channel in the receiving method 2 (paragraph [0085]), but He does not explicitly disclose “wherein the second type transceiver comprises at least one of: a first transceiver, configured to perform data monitoring based on a discontinuous reception (DRX) parameter of a first DRX group; or a second transceiver, configured to perform data monitoring based on a DRX parameter of a second DRX group.” Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 2, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 1, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein waking up the second type transceiver through the first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving the wakeup signal comprises: waking up the first transceiver through the first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 3, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 2, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the method further comprises: waking up the second transceiver through the first transceiver in response to the first transceiver receiving a predetermined instruction sent by an access network device. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 4, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 1, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein waking up the second type transceiver through the first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving the wakeup signal comprises: waking up at least one of the first transceiver or the second transceiver through the first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 5, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 1, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the first type transceiver comprises a third transceiver and a fourth transceiver; and waking up the second type transceiver through the first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving the wakeup signal comprises at least one of: waking up the first transceiver through the third transceiver in response to the third transceiver receiving the wakeup signal; or, waking up the second transceiver through the fourth transceiver in response to the fourth transceiver receiving the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 6, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 1, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein a frequency range of the first DRX group is a first frequency range FR1; or a frequency range of the second DRX group is a second frequency range; or the frequency range of the first DRX group is the first frequency range FR1 and the frequency range of the second DRX group is the second frequency range. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 7, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 1, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the method further comprises at least one of: in response to the first transceiver being woken up, performing monitoring of the wakeup signal or a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) based on the DRX parameter of the first DRX group; or, in response to the second transceiver being woken up, performing monitoring of the wakeup signal or the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the second DRX group. He discloses the UE acquires DRX related information from a system information block (SIB) 2, where the paging message is received by monitoring the PDCCH on a Paging Occasion (PO) in the DRX cycle, and the UE is only required to monitor to its own PO, such that the UE monitors and receives downlink channels and signals, including the PDCCH, within the “on duration” of the DRX cycle (paragraphs [0050] – [0054]), and Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 8, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 1, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the method further comprises at least one of: in response to the first transceiver being woken up, starting an inactive timer of the first DRX group corresponding to the first transceiver; or, in response to the second transceiver being woken up, starting an inactive timer of the second DRX group corresponding to the second transceiver. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); where PDCCH-based WUS indicates there is no DL grant (i.e., WUS indicates UE is to remain in inactive mode) and indicates there is an instance of a DL grant (i.e., WUS indicates that the UE is to wake-up at the next ON mode of the DRX cycle) (paragraph [0106]); the DRX configuration includes the time the UE is awake/active (the “active time”) based on the length of the DRX inactivity timer and the time at which the PDCCH is received, specifically, the UE starts the DRX inactivity timer and stays in the active state until the expiration of that timer when the PDDCH is received (which is reset each time a PDDCH is received during the active time) (paragraph [0093]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 9, He and Kumar disclose the method according to claim 1, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the method further comprises: receiving capability information sent by an access network device; wherein, the capability information is configured to indicate: supporting the first type transceiver to wake up at least one of the first transceiver or the second transceiver in the second type transceiver after the first type transceiver receives the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); where the dormancy configuration includes the SCELL list configured for dormancy in the initial RRC configuration, e.g. as part of the initial capability signaling from the serving base station (paragraph [0116]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor the PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor the SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 10, He discloses a wireless communication method, wherein the method is performed by an access network device, and the method comprises: sending capability information to a terminal (the terminal device includes transceiver module that receives a first wake-up signal or a second wake-up signal based on at least one of a predetermined rule, a DRX state, indication information, or a current state of the terminal device, wherein the first wake-up signal is carried over a WUR signal, and the second wake-up signal is not carried over the WUR signal, paragraph [0126]; UE includes wake-up receiver that receives the energy saving signal, where a primary receiver of the UE is turned on by the wake-up signal, paragraphs [0049], [0073]; the wake-up receiver is “first type” and primary receiver is the “second type”); wherein, the capability information is configured to wake up a second type transceiver of the terminal after the first type transceiver receives a wakeup signal (the terminal device includes transceiver module that receives a first wake-up signal or a second wake-up signal based on at least one of a predetermined rule, a DRX state, indication information, or a current state of the terminal device, wherein the first wake-up signal is carried over a WUR signal, and the second wake-up signal is not carried over the WUR signal, paragraph [0126]; UE includes wake-up receiver that receives the energy saving signal, where a primary receiver of the UE is turned on by the wake-up signal, paragraphs [0049], [0073]; the wake-up receiver is “first type” and primary receiver is the “second type”). While He teaches the UE receiving the first wake-up signal in the wake-up signal receiving method 1 (i.e. wake-up receiver), starting timer immediately or upon a time period in response to receiving the first wake-up signal, and receives the second wake-up signal during the operation of the timer in the wake-up signal receiving method 2 (i.e. primary receiver), where the UE receives the control/data channel in the receiving method 2 (paragraph [0085]), but He does not explicitly disclose “sending capability information to a terminal; wherein, the capability information is configured to indicate whether a first type transceiver of the terminal is supported or not supported to wake up a second type transceiver of the terminal after the first type transceiver receives a wakeup signal; and wherein the second type transceiver comprises at least one of: a first transceiver, configured to perform data monitoring based on a discontinuous reception (DRX) parameter of a first DRX group; or a second transceiver, configured to perform data monitoring based on a DRX parameter of a second DRX group.” Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]); where the dormancy configuration includes the SCELL list configured for dormancy in the initial RRC configuration, e.g. as part of the initial capability signaling from the serving base station (paragraph [0116]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 11, He discloses a wireless communication apparatus, wherein the apparatus comprises: a processor (the terminal device includes memory storing executable program codes and transceiver module coupled to the memory, where the one or more instructions when loaded and executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method according to the present disclosure paragraphs [0015] – [0022], [0126], [0157], [0160]); and a memory storing instructions executable by the processor (the terminal device includes memory storing executable program codes and transceiver module coupled to the memory, where the one or more instructions when loaded and executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method according to the present disclosure paragraphs [0015] – [0022], [0126], [0157], [0160]); wherein in the processor is configured to: wake up a second type transceiver through a first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving a wakeup signal (the terminal device includes transceiver module that receives a first wake-up signal or a second wake-up signal based on at least one of a predetermined rule, a DRX state, indication information, or a current state of the terminal device, wherein the first wake-up signal is carried over a WUR signal, and the second wake-up signal is not carried over the WUR signal, paragraph [0126]; UE includes wake-up receiver that receives the energy saving signal, where a primary receiver of the UE is turned on by the wake-up signal, paragraphs [0049], [0073]; the wake-up receiver is “first type” and primary receiver is the “second type”). While He teaches the UE receiving the first wake-up signal in the wake-up signal receiving method 1 (i.e. wake-up receiver), starting timer immediately or upon a time period in response to receiving the first wake-up signal, and receives the second wake-up signal during the operation of the timer in the wake-up signal receiving method 2 (i.e. primary receiver), where the UE receives the control/data channel in the receiving method 2 (paragraph [0085]), but He does not explicitly disclose “wherein the second type transceiver comprises at least one of: a first transceiver, configured to perform data monitoring based on a discontinuous reception (DRX) parameter of a first DRX group; or a second transceiver, configured to perform data monitoring based on a DRX parameter of a second DRX group.” Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 12, He discloses a wireless communication apparatus, wherein the apparatus comprises: a processor (the network device includes memory storing executable program codes and transceiver module coupled to the memory, where the one or more instructions when loaded and executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method according to the present disclosure paragraphs [0019] – [0023], [0141], [0184]); and a memory storing instructions executable by the processor (the network device includes memory storing executable program codes and transceiver module coupled to the memory, where the one or more instructions when loaded and executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method according to the present disclosure paragraphs [0019] – [0023], [0141], [0184]); wherein in the processor is configured to perform the wireless communication method according to claim 10 (the network device includes memory storing executable program codes and transceiver module coupled to the memory, where the one or more instructions when loaded and executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the method according to the present disclosure paragraphs [0019] – [0023], [0141], [0184]; see rejection of Claim 10). Regarding claim 15, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 11, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the processor is further configured to: wake up the first transceiver through the first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 16, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 15, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the processor is further configured to: wake up the second transceiver through the first transceiver in response to the first transceiver receiving a predetermined instruction sent by an access network device. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 17, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 11, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the processor is further configured to: wake up at least one of the first transceiver or the second transceiver through the first type transceiver in response to the first type transceiver receiving the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 18, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 11, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the first type transceiver comprises a third transceiver and a fourth transceiver; and the processor is further configured to perform at least one of: waking up the first transceiver through the third transceiver in response to the third transceiver receiving the wakeup signal; or, waking up the second transceiver through the fourth transceiver in response to the fourth transceiver receiving the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 19, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 11, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein a frequency range of the first DRX group is a first frequency range FR1; or a frequency range of the second DRX group is a second frequency range; or the frequency range of the first DRX group is the first frequency range FR1 and the frequency range of the second DRX group is the second frequency range. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 20, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 11, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the processor is further configured to perform at least one of: in response to the first transceiver being woken up, performing monitoring of the wakeup signal or a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) based on the DRX parameter of the first DRX group; or, in response to the second transceiver being woken up, performing monitoring of the wakeup signal or the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the second DRX group. He discloses the UE acquires DRX related information from a system information block (SIB) 2, where the paging message is received by monitoring the PDCCH on a Paging Occasion (PO) in the DRX cycle, and the UE is only required to monitor to its own PO, such that the UE monitors and receives downlink channels and signals, including the PDCCH, within the “on duration” of the DRX cycle (paragraphs [0050] – [0054]), and Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); the wireless nodes operate in multiple frequency ranges, FR1 (from 450 to 6000 MHz), FR2 (from 24250 to 52600 MHz), FR3 (above 52600 MHz), and FR4 (between FR1 and FR2), and one of the frequencies utilized by the base stations is an anchor carrier (or “PCell”) and other frequencies utilized by the base stations are secondary carriers (“SCells”) (paragraphs [0050] – [0051]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 21, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 11, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the processor is further configured to perform at least one of: in response to the first transceiver being woken up, starting an inactive timer of the first DRX group corresponding to the first transceiver; or, in response to the second transceiver being woken up, starting an inactive timer of the second DRX group corresponding to the second transceiver. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); where PDCCH-based WUS indicates there is no DL grant (i.e., WUS indicates UE is to remain in inactive mode) and indicates there is an instance of a DL grant (i.e., WUS indicates that the UE is to wake-up at the next ON mode of the DRX cycle) (paragraph [0106]); the DRX configuration includes the time the UE is awake/active (the “active time”) based on the length of the DRX inactivity timer and the time at which the PDCCH is received, specifically, the UE starts the DRX inactivity timer and stays in the active state until the expiration of that timer when the PDDCH is received (which is reset each time a PDDCH is received during the active time) (paragraph [0093]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor the PDCCH based on the DRX parameter of the SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Regarding claim 22, He and Kumar disclose the apparatus according to claim 11, but He does not explicitly disclose wherein the processor is further configured to: receive capability information sent by an access network device; wherein, the capability information is configured to indicate: supporting the first type transceiver to wake up at least one of the first transceiver or the second transceiver in the second type transceiver after the first type transceiver receives the wakeup signal. Kumar discloses the serving gNB sends a WUS signal to the UE indicating that the UE is the wake up during next ON time during DRX cycle, where the serving gNB updates the dormancy configuration to remove the one or more SCells from the dormancy list to wake up the selected monitoring occasions, and sends the updated WUS configuration to the UE to remove the one or more SCells from dormancy list (paragraphs [0125], [0129], [0130]); where the dormancy configuration includes the SCELL list configured for dormancy in the initial RRC configuration, e.g. as part of the initial capability signaling from the serving base station (paragraph [0116]). Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of He and Kumar before him or her, to incorporate the serving gNB sending WUS configuration as taught by Kumar, to improve the UE of He for activating first transceiver to monitor the PCell or activating second transceiver to monitor the SCell. The motivation for doing so would have been to reduce power consumption (paragraph [0004] of Kumar). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: HWANG et al (US Patent Application Publication 2021/0306953) – the communication device transmits a WUS for setting a group WUS configuration related to the setting of a WUS resource for each UE group, transmitting the set group WUS configuration, and transmitting a WUS on the basis of the group WUS configuration, wherein the group WUS configuration is divided into a second WUS configuration for discontinuous reception (DRX) and a first WUS configuration for eDRX SEO et al (US Patent Application Publication 2022/0124623) – the WUS is monitored in the monitoring occasion if a monitoring occasion is present in a monitoring window for monitoring DCI (WUS) comprising a wake-up indication, and the relevant operation is performed in a DRX ON duration on the basis if the WUS is detected, where the WUS indicates whether or not to wake up from a plurality of DRX cycles, indicates various configurations in accordance with the length of the DRX cycles, and the terminal wakes up from a DRX cycle linked to the monitoring occasion and performs PDCCH monitoring for a general DCI detection not comprising a wake-up indication monitoring occasion is not present in the monitoring window LYU et al (US Patent Application Publication 2023/0309061) – the terminal in a first terminal group receives PEI (paging early indication) sent by a network device, where the PEI indicates whether at least one terminal in the terminal group is to receive paging indication information, and the terminal group corresponds to a paging occasion (PO) group Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAI J CHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-5448. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10AM-6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marcus Smith can be reached at (571)270-1096. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Kai Chang/Examiner, Art Unit 2468 /Thomas R Cairns/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2468
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12719646
TECHNIQUES FOR CONFIGURING CONTROL CHANNEL MONITORING SKIP DURATIONS
4y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12690079
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DATA
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684051
Data Transmission Method and Electronic Device
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677114
ACCESS NETWORK SIGNALING AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION FOR MULTICAST/BROADCAST SESSIONS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677301
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.0%)
3y 8m (~1y 9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 422 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month