Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/858,031

DEVICE FOR REDUCING BOUNCING OF ELEVATOR CAR

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Oct 18, 2024
Priority
Apr 22, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0050374 +2 more
Examiner
TRAN, DIEM M
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Hyundai Elevator Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
532 granted / 665 resolved
+28.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
686
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
70.3%
+30.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 665 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is the Final Office Action on the merits of Application No. 18/858031, filed on 10/18/2024. Claims 1-2, 4, 6-15 are still pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 9-13, 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KR 10-2004-0019269 to Funai (henceforth referred to as Funai). Regarding claims 1-2, 9-13, 15, Funai discloses a bouncing reduction device for an elevator cars (i.e. Machine Translation of Abstract: “the elevator apparatus, the vibration reduction device”), configured to reduce a bouncing phenomenon in which an elevator car (i.e. Fig. 1, ref. 10) configured to move along a guide rail (i.e. Fig. 1, ref. 8) in a hoistway (i.e. Fig. 1, ref. 1) vibrates in a vertical direction when passengers board and alight from the elevator car (i.e. Machine Translation, page 1, fourth paragraph from the bottom: “ when passengers get on and off.. the car may shake and oscillate”), the bouncing reduction device comprising: a friction module (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 14) coupled to the elevator to be pressed against the guide rail; a friction drive unit (i.e. Fig. 3, ref. 18) coupled to the elevator car and configured to force the friction module to be pressed against the guide rail; a drive control unit (i.e. Fig. 3, ref. 20) configured to control activation and deactivation of the friction drive unit in response to an operating state signal of the elevator car from a separate central control panel, wherein the friction module is pressed against the guide rail upon activation of the friction drive unit (i.e. Machine Translation page 3, 8th paragraph: “the electromagnetic actuator 18 is driven, the guide rail 8 is held by a pair of friction shoes 17”), wherein the friction drive unit comprises: a solenoid housing having an electric coil disposed therein (i.e. Fig. 3, ref. 18 and Machine Translation page 3, 8th paragraph: implied in “electromagnetic actuator 18”); and a solenoid mover (i.e. Fig. 3, piston of the solenoid seen inside ref. 19) coupled to the solenoid housing to be movable back and forth, wherein the friction module comprises: a friction body (i.e. Fig. 3, ref. 17) separated from the solenoid mover (i.e. via Fig. 3 ref. 16) and coupled to one side of the solenoid housing to be movable back and forth, wherein the friction body is pushed forward away by the solenoid mover upon forward movement of the solenoid mover; and an elastic spring (i.e. Fig. 3, ref. 19) applying elastic force to the friction body in a direction away from the guide rail (i.e. Machine Translation page 3, seventh paragraph: “a return spring 19”). Wherein the friction module is moved to be pressed against the guide rail upon activation of the friction drive unit and is resiliently returned to an original position thereof to be separated from the guide rail upon deactivation of the friction drive unit (i.e. Machine Translation page 3, 8th – 10th paragraph: “the electromagnetic actuator 18 is driven, the guide rail 8 is held by a pair of friction shoes 17… when the electromagnetic actuator 18 is not driven, the friction shoe 17 is opened”). Wherein the drive control unit is configured to control the friction drive unit by changing power supplied from a separate power supply to the electric coil (i.e. Machine Translation page 3, 8th – 10th paragraph: changing of power implied in “the electromagnetic actuator 18 is driven, the guide rail 8 is held by a pair of friction shoes 17… when the electromagnetic actuator 18 is not driven, the friction shoe 17 is opened”). Wherein the drive control unit is configured to receive a door open/close signal of the elevator car wherein the drive control unit is configured to receive a door open/close signal of the elevator car from the central control panel and to activate or deactivate the friction drive unit according to the door open/close signal (i.e. Machine Translation page 3, fifth paragraph from the bottom: “electromagnetic actuator 18 is connected to … control device 20… drives the electromagnetic actuator 18 to operate the vibration reduction device 14 when the car 6 is stopped and the door is in an open state”). Further comprising: an operation detection sensor configured to detect an operating state of the friction drive unit, wherein the drive control unit is configured to receive a detection signal of the operation detection sensor and transmit the detection signal to the central control panel (i.e. Machine Translation page 4, last paragraph: “load fluctuation of the car 6 can be detected and a suitable torque can be made… the vibration at the start of the car 6 can also be prevented”). Wherein the drive control unit is configured to receive an operating intensity signal of the friction drive unit from the central control panel and to change operating intensity of the friction drive unit according to the received operating intensity signal (i.e. Machine Translation page 4, last paragraph: “load fluctuation of the car 6 can be detected and a suitable torque can be made… the vibration at the start of the car 6 can also be prevented”). Wherein the friction drive unit is detachably coupled to a guide rail device of the elevator car through a separate coupling module (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 12, 15), and the friction module is coupled to the friction drive unit to be movable back and forth by the friction drive unit. Wherein the coupling module comprises: a support plate (i.e. Fig. 2, not referenced but structure shown below ref. 15 attached above ref. 9) detachably coupled to one end of the guide roller device; and an adapter plate (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 15) coupled to one surface of the support plate and having an upper portion allowing the friction drive unit to be seated thereon and coupled thereto. Wherein the support plate extends in a horizontal direction to cover a space outside a guide rail roller of the guide roller device (i.e. Fig. 2, ref. 15 extend above ref. 12 but also extends over the structure above ref. 9). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over KR 10-2004-0019269 to Funai in view of US Patent No. 5,321,217 to Traktovenko et al (henceforth referred to as Traktovenko). Regarding claim 14, Funai does not specifically teach the adapter block is configured to adjust a position of the friction drive unit with respect to the guide rail. However, in coupling art and in elevator retrofit art, slotted connection holes are used to allow adjustment in coupling of two mechanical parts. For example, in Traktovenko Fig. 34, slotted holes can be seen on ref. 1148 and slotted holes can be seen in Traktovenko Fig. 30, ref. 1070. It would have been obvious to use slotted holes as taught in Traktovenko in the adapter plate as taught in Funai to allow for positioning flexibility and adjustments during installation and there would have been reasonable expectation of success. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 6-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIEM M TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7825. The examiner can normally be reached M 9-5, W-F 10-2. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Mansen can be reached at 571-272-6608. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIEM M TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 18, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection (signed) — §102, §103
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 29, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12674437
Wind Turbine Tower Elevator with Tower Belt
1y 5m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668458
A PLATFORM LIFTING SYSTEM
1y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12654990
PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR ELEVATORS
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654993
SAFETY LOCKING DEVICE FOR A SHAFT DOOR OF AN ELEVATOR AND METHOD FOR OPENING A SHAFT DOOR OF AN ELEVATOR USING A SAFETY LOCKING DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12654991
BOUNCE DAMPER FOR AN ELEVATOR SYSTEM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 665 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month