Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/858,639

COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, RADIO WAVE REFRACTION PLATE, AND METHOD FOR CALCULATING INSTALLATION POSITION OF RADIO WAVE REFRACTION PLATE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 21, 2024
Priority
Apr 28, 2022 — JP 2022-075131 +1 more
Examiner
LUQUE, RENAN
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
432 granted / 552 resolved
+10.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
570
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.4%
+8.4% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 552 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/21/2024 and 1/8/2026 was in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 7, 10, 11, and 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Mikawa (WO 2019198702 A1; see translation). With regards to claim 1. Mikawa disclose(s): (Original) A communication system (figs 14-24), comprising: a base station (11; fig 14) configured to transmit and receive a radio wave [0078]; a terminal (12; fig 14) configured to transmit and receive the radio wave to and from the base station [0078]; and a plurality of radio wave refraction plates (9; fig 22; [0102]) installed on the same plane (103) between the base station and the terminal and configured to refract the radio wave and emit a refracted radio wave in a direction of the terminal when the radio wave transmitted from the base station passes through each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates ([0102-0103]). With regards to claim 2. Mikawa disclose(s): (Original) The communication system according to claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates (9; fig 22) is installed, on an installation plane (103) that passes through a geometric center of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates (9) and is orthogonal to a line connecting an antenna of the base station and an antenna of the terminal (see plane of 103 being orthogonal to at least one of the electromagnetic propagation which involves signal from base station to terminal), in a region defined by a first linear distance between the antenna of the base station and a geometric center of each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates and a second linear distance between the antenna of the terminal and the geometric center of each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates (see electromagnetic propagation towards 103 and electromagnetic propagation coming out of 103 which involves linear distance between antenna of base station or terminal to refraction plate). With regards to claim 7. Mikawa disclose(s): (Currently Amended) The communication system according to claim 1, wherein coordinates of a plurality of unit structures included in the plurality of radio wave refraction plates are plotted on a graph indicating a position on a horizontal axis and a transmission phase on a vertical axis (see xyz in fig 22), and the plurality of radio wave refraction plates (9) is installed with the coordinates placed on a straight line (see coordinate Y). With regards to claim 10. Mikawa disclose(s): (Original) A radio wave refraction plate (figs 22), comprising a plurality of radio wave refraction plates (9; fig 22; [0102]) installed on the same plane (103) between a base station configured to transmit and receive a radio wave and a terminal configured to transmit and receive the radio wave to and from the base station and configured to refract the radio wave and emit a refracted radio wave in a direction of the terminal when the radio wave transmitted from the base station passes through each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates ([0102-0103]). With regards to claim 11. Mikawa disclose(s): (Original) The radio wave refraction plate according to claim 10, wherein each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates is installed (fig 22), on an installation plane (103) that passes through a geometric center of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates (9) and is orthogonal to a line connecting an antenna of the base station and an antenna of the terminal (see plane of 103 being orthogonal to at least one of the electromagnetic propagation which involves signal from base station to terminal), in a region defined by a first linear distance between the antenna of the base station and a geometric center of each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates and a second linear distance between the antenna of the terminal and the geometric center of each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates (see electromagnetic propagation towards 103 and electromagnetic propagation coming out of 103 which involves linear distance between antenna of base station or terminal to refraction plate). With regards to claim 16. Mikawa disclose(s): (Currently Amended) The radio wave refraction plate according to claim 10, wherein coordinates of a plurality of unit structures included in the plurality of radio wave refraction plates are plotted on a graph indicating a position on a horizontal axis and a transmission phase on a vertical axis (see xyz in fig 22), and the plurality of radio wave refraction plates (9) is installed with the coordinates placed on a straight line (see coordinate Y). Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 19 is/are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: With regards to claim(s) 19: the prior art fails to disclose a/an method requiring: projecting the plurality of refraction plates on the plane; and calculating installation positions of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates with an area of each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates included in an odd-order Fresnel zone being larger than an area of each of the plurality of radio wave refraction plates included in an even-order Fresnel zone, in combination with other limitations of the claim. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 3-6, 8-9, 12-14, 15, and 17-18 is/are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Polehn (US 20200144717 A1) discloses: A radio frequency (RF) transceiver transmits a radio signal to the phased array antenna. The phased array antenna deflects the radio signal that is arriving at the phased array antenna in a particular direction indicated by the optical control beam. The particular direction of the deflected radio signal is toward a particular user device. The radio signal includes an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal over a Fifth Generation carrier. PNG media_image1.png 519 572 media_image1.png Greyscale Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Renan Luque whose telephone number is (571)270-1044. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Taningco can be reached at (571) 272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RENAN LUQUE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12770845
TEMPERATURE CONTROL SYSTEM AND PLASMA PROCESSING SYSTEM
1y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12754223
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES IN ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES MEASUREMENT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12756099
ANTENNA STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12750933
DRIVING SYSTEM FOR A LIGHTING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750942
ION IMPLANTER AND LINEAR ACCELERATOR HAVING POLYGONAL BACKBONE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.5%)
2y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 552 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month