Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/858,766

Method And Apparatus For Reporting Channel State Information In Mobile Communications

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 22, 2024
Priority
Apr 25, 2022 — provisional 63/334,320 +1 more
Examiner
ACOLATSE, KODZOVI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
783 granted / 935 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
989
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 935 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is responsive to Application 18/858,766 filed 10/22/2024 in which claims 1-20 are presented for examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 9-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Abdelghaffar et al (US 2023/0198725 A1). Regarding claim 1, Abdelghaffar teaches a method, comprising: determining, by a processor of an apparatus, a set of resource units from a plurality of resource units, wherein the plurality of resource units is time-frequency based (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11; [0118], UE receives CSI resource configuration from a base station; The CSI resource configuration may include a CSI resource configuration bitmap 1160); and reporting, by the processor, one or more channel state information (CSI) for the set of resource units to at least one network node of a wireless network (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11-12; [0130], UE transmits CSI report to the base station). Regarding claim 13, Abdelghaffar teaches an apparatus, comprising: a transceiver which, during operation, wirelessly communicates with at least one network node of a wireless network; and a processor communicatively coupled to the transceiver such that, during operation, the processor performs operations comprising: determining a set of resource units from a plurality of resource units, wherein the plurality of resource units is time-frequency based (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11; [0118], UE receives CSI resource configuration from a base station; The CSI resource configuration may include a CSI resource configuration bitmap 1160); and reporting, via the transceiver, one or more channel state information (CSI) for the set of resource units to the at least one network node (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11-12; [0130], UE transmits CSI report to the base station). Regarding claims 2 and 14, Abdelghaffar teaches wherein each resource unit of the plurality of resource units consist of one or more resource blocks (RBs) in frequency domain and one or more slots in time domain (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11; [0118]). Regarding claims 3 and 15, Abdelghaffar teaches wherein the set of resource units includes non-contiguous resource units in the plurality of resource units (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11; [0118], [0123]). Regarding claims 4 and 16, Abdelghaffar teaches receiving, by the processor, a bitmap of the plurality of the resource units from the at least one network node; wherein the set of resource units is determined according to the bitmap (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11; [0118]). Regarding claims 5 and 17, Abdelghaffar teaches receiving, by the processor, a number of resource unit from the at least one network node; wherein the set of resource units is determined according to the number of resource unit (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11; [0118]). Regarding claim 9, Abdelghaffar teaches wherein the plurality of resource units starts from a specific slot, the specific slot is an uplink slot of CSI reporting or a slot after a number of slot after the uplink slot, and the number of slot is configured by the at least one network node (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 5; [0125]-[0126]). Regarding claim 10, Abdelghaffar teaches wherein one CSI is reported for one resource unit in the set of resource units or one CSI is reported for multiple resource units in the set of resource units (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11-12; [0130], UE transmits CSI report to the base station). Regarding claim 11, Abdelghaffar teaches wherein the plurality of resource units are divided into a plurality of resource unit groups, and one CSI is reported for resource units in a same resource unit group (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11-12; [0118]; [0130], UE transmits CSI report to the base station). Regarding claim 12, Abdelghaffar teaches wherein each of the plurality of resource units includes a plurality of sub-resource units, and one CSI is reported for: one resource unit in the set of resource units; multiple resource units in the set of resource units; or one sub-resource unit of the plurality of sub-resource units (Abdelghaffar: Fig. 11-12; [0118]; [0130], UE transmits CSI report to the base station). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abdelghaffar et al (US 2023/0198725 A1) in view of Han et al (US 2019/0297519 A1). Regarding claims 6 and 18, Abdelghaffar does not teach reporting, by the processor, an index corresponding to the set of resource units to the at least one network node wherein the index corresponds to one combination of the number of resource unit of the plurality of resource units. Han teaches reporting, by the processor, an index corresponding to the set of resource units to the at least one network node wherein the index corresponds to one combination of the number of resource unit of the plurality of resource units (Han: [0165], CSI reporting with bitmap/index of the resources). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Abdelghaffar by reporting, by the processor, an index corresponding to the set of resource units to the at least one network node wherein the index corresponds to one combination of the number of resource unit of the plurality of resource units as disclosed by Han to provide a system for channel state information reporting (Han: Abstract). Claims 7 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abdelghaffar et al (US 2023/0198725 A1) in view of Li et al (US 2025/0088887 A1). Regarding claims 7 and 19, Abdelghaffar does not teach but Li teaches wherein the set of resource units is determined according to at least one of a capability of throughput of the apparatus and a transmission prediction (Li: [0006]-[0007]). . It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Abdelghaffar wherein the set of resource units is determined according to at least one of a capability of throughput of the apparatus and a transmission prediction as disclosed by Li to provide a system for channel state information reporting (Li: Abstract). Claims 8 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Abdelghaffar et al (US 2023/0198725 A1) in view of Li et al (US 2025/0088887 A1) in further view of Han et al (US 2019/0297519 A1). Regarding claims 8 and 20, Abdelghaffar in view of LI does not teach by Han teaches transmitting, by the processor, a bitmap of the plurality of the resource units to the at least one network node, wherein the bitmap corresponds to the set of resource units (Han: [0165], CSI reporting with bitmap/index of the resources). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Abdelghaffar in view of Li transmitting, by the processor, a bitmap of the plurality of the resource units to the at least one network node, wherein the bitmap corresponds to the set of resource units as disclosed by Han to provide a system for channel state information reporting (Han: Abstract). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KODZOVI ACOLATSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1999. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10 am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Avellino Joseph can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KODZOVI ACOLATSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 22, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706853
TIMESTAMP SYNCHRONIZATION BETWEEN HOST AND NETWORK INTERFACE DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707346
HANDOVER MANAGEMENT IN A SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707341
INTEGRATION OF PROACTIVITY IN WIRELESS NETWORKS VIA TARGETED-CONTRACTS
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12707465
EFFICIENT TECHNIQUES FOR RESOURCE SELECTION ASSISTANCE REPORTING FOR NR REL-17 SIDELINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701574
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, BASE STATION, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.1%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 935 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month