Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/858,774

Method, pharmacy, dispensing device, medication dispensing container and computer program product for dispensing discrete medicaments

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 22, 2024
Priority
May 12, 2022 — NL 2031839 +1 more
Examiner
MARU, TEMESGEN MALLEDE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Vmi Holland B.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
8 granted / 11 resolved
+12.7% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
20
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
68.3%
+28.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§112
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 11 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/22/2024 was considered by the examiner. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. A certified copy of application NL2031839 was filed on 10/22/2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. Claim 38 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 38 recites two alternatives, A. wherein the one or more guide bodies are mechanically adjustable to vary the dimensions of the dispensing path defined by said one or more guide bodies between the first configuration state and the second configuration state; and/or B. wherein the adjustable medication dispensing container comprises an actuator element for mechanically adjusting the one or more guide bodies, wherein the actuator element comprises hygroscopically expandable material. The specification and drawings do not reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art how the dispensing mechanism of the alternative, “A” alone, is performed to adjustably vary the dispensing path defined by said one or more guide bodies between a first configuration state and a second configuration state from instructions generated by a control unit. This alternative lacks an actuator as the actuator is only present in the second alternative. In addition, the specification generally mentions “suitable actuators” without providing further guidance on the type of actuators that can be used and how they are implemented in the dispensing mechanism, and the drawings do not provide addition information regarding this alternative. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 36 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 36 recites “generating … an instruction for adjusting dimensions … wherein the adjustable medication dispensing container is adjusted” does not clearly define whether actual adjustment of the container is a required method step or merely describing the intended content or purpose of the generated instruction. The claim also does not clearly define the relationship between the generated instruction and actual adjustment. Therefore, it is unclear whether the claimed method is completed upon generation of the instruction, upon actual adjustment of the container or only when both occur. Claim 38 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 38 recites “wherein the one or more guide bodies are mechanically adjustable to vary the dimensions of the dispensing path defined by said one or more guide bodies between the first configuration state and the second configuration state” in the first alternative, “A” alone. It is not clear how the dispensing mechanism effects this adjustment without some type of actuator present, or if manually adjustable by a pharmacist, what mechanism allows this adjustment to be performed. Additionally, claim 38 recites “mechanically adjusting the one or more guide bodies, wherein the actuator element comprises hygroscopically expandable material” in the second alternative. Claim 38 allows the actuator element to comprise hygroscopically expandable material that mechanically responds to humidity. The specification states the actuator element 199 expands under relative humidity and drives segments 196 outward. No deliberate control unit instruction appears to be necessary for that adjustment. It is unclear whether the adjustment required by the incorporated claim 36 must occur in response to the control unit’s generated instruction or may instead occur independently through the expansion of the hygroscopically expandable material. Therefore, the claim fails to define the required relationship between the generated instruction and the resulting mechanical adjustment. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 7, 10, 12-15, 19, 26, 29, 31, 33-35, 41 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. 'T Lam (US 10173830) discloses a plurality of medication dispensing containers that are used to hold and discharge a specific medicament. Each container has passageways dimensioned to allow a specific medicament with corresponding dimensions (col. 15, line 36 to col. 16, line 8; Figs. 4-5). KOIKE et al. (US 20240122810 A1) discloses a tablet cassette having an adjustable tablet guide path whose depth, height, and width can be adjusted according to a stored tablet's known shape or size, including adjustment based on target dimensions retrieved from a tablet-master database and a manual or motor driven adjustment mechanism (para. [0084]-[0085], [0132]; Fig. 9). MACVITTIE et al. (US 20160107820 A1) discloses an intelligent pill dispenser having a removable dispensing cartridge, a controller, and a temperature and humidity sensor that supplies ambient condition signals to the controller. MacVittie further teaches comparing detected temperature or humidity with a stored threshold and preventing operation of the dispensing motor when the threshold is exceeded (para. [0027], [0040]). Shoenfeld (US 20090231132 A1) discloses a hospital refrigerator having a temperature and relative humidity sensors connected to a microprocessor, which compares the measured conditions with preset limits and disables a remotely operated refrigerator locker generates an alert when adverse condition is detected (para. [0048]-[0049]. HAYAKAWA (US 20240197565 A1) discloses a pill container with pill pockets dimensioned to accommodate pills with dimensional variation that may be caused by manufacturing accuracy or expansion due to moisture of the surrounding environment (para. [0087]-[0090]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TEMESGEN M. MARU whose telephone number is (571)272-0039. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday 8:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jacob Scott can be reached at (571)270-3415. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TEMESGEN M. MARU/Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3655 /JACOB S. SCOTT/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3655
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 22, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740367
POSITION DETERMINATION APPARATUS FOR ROBOT DETECTION LASER SENSOR SYSTEM IN FOUP MOVABLE BY OHT
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12698155
METHOD FOR STORING OR RETRIEIVING STORAGE AIDS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692069
CEILING STORAGE SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12661783
ROBOT DEVICE FOR TRANSPORTING USED TREATMENT TOOLS TO DISINFECTION ROOM
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12664849
LOTTERY TICKET VENDING MACHINE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+30.3%)
2y 10m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 11 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month