Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/859,300

REINFORCED GLASS PLATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING REINFORCED GLASS PLATE, AND GLASS PLATE TO BE REINFORCED

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2022 — JP 2022-073331 +5 more
Examiner
SAMPLE, DAVID R
Art Unit
1741
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nippon Electric Glass Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
522 granted / 654 resolved
+14.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
60.7%
+20.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 654 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group I in the reply filed on 09 April 2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 21-24 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 09 April 2026. Claim Objections Claims 2-8, 13, 14 and 18 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claims 2-8 do not end in a period. In claim 13, line 2, “as” should be -- in --. In claim 14, line 2, “as” should be -- in --. As to claim 18, the limitation, “a temperature at a viscosity at high temperature of 102.5 dPa·s of 1,680°C or less,” is not idiomatic English. The limitation could be rewritten as “the glass sheet has a temperature corresponding to a viscosity of 102.5 dPa·s of 1680°C or less.” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13, 15-16 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Yuki et al. (WO 2020/138062 A1)(Yuki). The rejection is over WO 2020/138062 A1 because the reference has an earlier publication date. However, the English-language equivalent, US 2022/0041493 A1, will be cited below. Yuki discloses a tempered glass sheet. See the abstract. Sample No’s 35, 81, 82, 84, 85, 91, 92, 94, 105, 110-112, 114, 115, 117-121, 123, 124, 126-135, 138, 139, 142-144, 210, 212 and 213 have glass compositions and values for Q, U, W, X, Y and Z that fall within the ranges of instant claims 1-12. See Tables 9-22 of Yuki and the table below showing the values calculated by the examiner for the claimed formulas (Q, U, W, X, Y and Z). An example falling within a claimed range anticipates the range. See MPEP 2131.03. 35 81 82 84 85 91 92 SiO2 63.58 62.99 63.58 63.58 62.58 64.36 63.36 Al2O3 16.55 17.81 16.55 15.55 17.55 17.81 17.81 B2O3 0.10 0.10 0.10 Li2O 8.19 8.90 9.19 8.69 8.19 8.34 8.84 Na2O 8.09 8.90 7.09 8.59 8.09 8.10 8.60 K2O 0.52 1.25 0.52 0.52 0.52 1.25 1.25 MgO 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 P2O5 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 SnO2 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Fe2O3 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Cl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B2O3+MgO+CaO 0.33 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.10 R2O/Al2O3 1.02 1.07 1.02 1.14 0.96 0.99 1.05 Q -11.87 -22.94 -12.37 -10.62 -15.87 -16.01 -22.00 U 7482.74 7604.78 7507.64 7243.97 7575.47 7699.25 7661.21 W 407.91 435.53 478.64 395.81 426.01 435.87 441.86 X 552.81 602.25 625.67 537.96 581.28 592.45 606.07 Y 19.31 19.76 18.31 19.01 19.35 19.99 19.73 Z 42.01 44.60 52.44 39.34 44.24 46.46 46.01 Na2O/Li2O 0.99 1.00 0.77 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 R2O+Al2O3 33.35 36.86 33.35 33.35 34.35 35.50 36.50 Li2O/Al2O3 0.49 0.50 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.47 0.50 Softening point (°C) N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 915 N.A. N.A. T at 102.5 dPa·s (°C) 1593 1556 1589 1575 N.A. 1595 1570 94 105 110 111 112 114 115 SiO2 63.50 62.96 64.50 64.50 64.50 64.50 64.50 Al2O3 15.56 18.10 18.50 18.50 18.50 18.50 18.50 B2O3 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Li2O 8.10 8.72 6.00 7.00 8.00 7.00 8.00 Na2O 8.00 7.93 6.00 5.00 4.00 6.00 5.00 K2O 2.15 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 MgO 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 P2O5 2.55 1.40 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 SnO2 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Fe2O3 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Cl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B2O3+MgO+CaO 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 R2O/Al2O3 1.17 0.96 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.74 0.74 Q -10.57 -19.85 -8.06 -8.56 -9.06 -11.26 -11.76 U 7190.29 7704.97 8081.28 8106.18 8131.08 8075.08 8099.98 W 387.91 461.76 413.14 483.87 554.60 454.57 525.30 X 523.81 624.95 548.23 621.09 693.95 596.79 669.65 Y 19.34 19.49 20.44 19.44 18.44 19.89 18.89 Z 40.41 49.76 48.04 58.47 68.90 52.94 63.37 Na2O/Li2O 0.99 0.91 1.00 0.71 0.50 0.86 0.63 R2O+Al2O3 33.81 35.50 31.26 31.26 31.26 32.26 32.26 Li2O/Al2O3 0.52 0.48 0.32 0.38 0.43 0.38 0.43 Softening point (°C) N.A. 915 981 972 966 968 961 T at 102.5 dPa·s (°C) 1579 1574 1644 1632 1618 1623 1612 117 118 119 120 121 123 124 SiO2 64.50 64.50 64.50 64.50 64.50 64.50 64.50 Al2O3 18.50 18.50 18.50 18.50 18.50 18.50 18.50 B2O3 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Li2O 7.00 8.00 6.38 7.38 8.38 7.38 8.38 Na2O 7.00 6.00 6.38 5.38 4.38 6.38 5.38 K2O 0.76 0.76 MgO 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 P2O5 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 SnO2 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Fe2O3 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Cl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B2O3+MgO+CaO 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 R2O/Al2O3 0.80 0.80 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.74 0.74 Q -13.96 -14.46 -8.63 -9.13 -9.63 -11.83 -12.33 U 8043.98 8068.88 8081.24 8106.14 8131.04 8075.04 8099.94 W 425.27 496.00 417.75 488.48 559.21 459.18 529.91 X 572.49 645.35 557.45 630.31 703.17 606.01 678.87 Y 20.34 19.34 20.40 19.40 18.40 19.85 18.85 Z 47.41 57.84 47.80 58.23 68.66 52.70 63.13 Na2O/Li2O 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.73 0.52 0.86 0.64 R2O+Al2O3 33.26 33.26 31.26 31.26 31.26 32.26 32.26 Li2O/Al2O3 0.38 0.43 0.34 0.40 0.45 0.40 0.45 Softening point (°C) 965 957 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. T at 102.5 dPa·s (°C) 1618 1609 N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 SiO2 64.50 64.50 61.30 61.00 60.20 59.80 59.80 Al2O3 18.50 18.50 15.40 15.00 15.40 16.50 15.40 B2O3 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Li2O 7.38 8.38 7.80 8.00 8.00 7.80 7.80 Na2O 7.38 6.38 7.00 7.80 7.80 7.00 7.00 K2O 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.50 2.50 MgO 0.10 0.10 2.36 2.06 2.46 3.46 2.36 P2O5 2.00 2.00 3.50 4.50 4.50 2.80 4.00 SnO2 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Fe2O3 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Cl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B2O3+MgO+CaO 0.20 0.20 2.46 2.16 2.56 3.56 2.46 R2O/Al2O3 0.80 0.80 1.12 1.15 1.12 1.05 1.12 Q -14.53 -15.03 -9.40 -7.90 -9.90 -15.04 -10.30 U 8043.94 8068.84 7264.18 7084.26 7131.91 7484.38 7113.09 W 429.88 500.61 405.10 382.22 390.01 426.55 404.99 X 581.71 654.57 531.84 511.85 523.72 563.44 534.07 Y 20.30 19.30 16.26 16.64 16.18 15.15 15.95 Z 47.17 57.60 38.76 34.97 34.96 38.81 38.56 Na2O/Li2O 1.00 0.76 0.90 0.98 0.98 0.90 0.90 R2O+Al2O3 33.26 33.26 32.70 32.30 32.70 33.80 32.70 Li2O/Al2O3 0.40 0.45 0.51 0.53 0.52 0.47 0.51 Softening point (°C) N.A. N.A. 883 875 873 N.A. 879 T at 102.5 dPa·s (°C) N.A. N.A. 1560 1554 1545 1524 1553 133 134 135 138 139 142 143 SiO2 60.50 61.00 60.50 58.46 61.26 61.30 60.40 Al2O3 15.00 15.00 15.00 16.15 15.40 15.40 16.15 B2O3 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Li2O 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.25 8.64 7.80 9.25 Na2O 7.80 6.80 6.80 6.75 6.46 7.00 6.75 K2O 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.75 2.50 2.50 0.75 MgO 2.06 2.06 2.06 4.00 2.40 2.36 2.06 P2O5 5.00 4.50 5.00 4.50 3.20 3.50 4.50 SnO2 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Fe2O3 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Cl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B2O3+MgO+CaO 2.16 2.16 2.16 4.10 2.50 2.46 2.16 R2O/Al2O3 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.04 1.14 1.12 1.04 Q -7.80 -8.40 -8.30 -14.07 -10.67 -9.40 -12.13 U 7020.56 7109.16 7045.46 7351.02 7276.82 7264.18 7299.82 W 382.19 452.95 452.92 488.27 455.77 405.10 485.63 X 512.60 584.71 585.46 632.33 585.80 531.84 629.99 Y 16.53 15.64 15.53 13.35 15.51 16.26 15.64 Z 34.91 45.40 45.34 45.14 45.77 38.76 49.54 Na2O/Li2O 0.98 0.76 0.76 0.73 0.75 0.90 0.73 R2O+Al2O3 32.30 32.30 32.30 32.90 33.00 32.70 32.90 Li2O/Al2O3 0.53 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.56 0.51 0.57 Softening point (°C) 872 870 864 N.A. N.A. 884 N.A. T at 102.5 dPa·s (°C) 1554 1546 1543 1492 1537 1556 1534 144 210 212 213 SiO2 68.20 59.61 59.61 59.61 Al2O3 9.50 18.60 18.60 18.60 B2O3 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.50 Li2O 9.00 8.11 8.11 8.11 Na2O 6.16 8.10 8.10 8.10 K2O 3.00 0.45 0.15 0.15 MgO 4.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 P2O5 0.00 4.30 4.60 4.30 TiO2 0.01 0.01 0.01 SnO2 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 Fe2O3 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 Cl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 B2O3+MgO+CaO 4.10 0.70 0.70 1.00 R2O/Al2O3 1.91 0.90 0.88 0.88 Q 9.36 -20.05 -19.39 -20.05 U 7106.05 7486.20 7491.78 7531.87 W 375.05 440.63 440.63 439.31 X 440.60 609.21 609.21 608.25 Y 13.61 18.80 18.80 18.70 Z 32.75 45.49 45.49 45.45 Na2O/Li2O 0.68 1.00 1.00 1.00 R2O+Al2O3 27.66 35.26 34.96 34.96 Li2O/Al2O3 0.95 0.44 0.44 0.44 Softening point (°C) 713 N.A. N.A. N.A. T at 102.5 dPa·s (°C) 1445 N.A. N.A. N.A. In the above table, “R2O” means Li2O + Na2O + K2O. As to claim 13, Yuki discloses Cl may be added in an amount of 0.01 or more and 0.1 or less. See paragraph [0055]. This range is sufficiently specific to anticipate the range recited in claim 13. See MPEP 2131.03. As to claim 15, anticipatory Sample No’s 85, 105, 128-130, 132-135, 142 and 144 of Yuki have a softening point of 920°C or less. See Tables 9-22 of Yuki and the table above. As to claim 16, anticipatory Sample No’s 35, 81, 82, 84, 85, 91, 92, 94, 105, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 117, 128-131, 133-135, 138, 139, 210, 212 and 213 have a CSK (i.e., surface compressive stress) between 200 and 1400 MPa and a DOL_ZEROK (i.e., depth of compression) between 3 and 200 µm. See Tables 9-22. As to claim 18, anticipatory Sample No’s 35, 81, 82, 84, 91, 92, 94, 105, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 117-118, 128-135, 138, 139, 142-144 of Yuki have a temperature corresponding to a viscosity of 102.5 dpa·s of 1680°C or less. See Tables 9-22 of Yuki and the table above. As to claim 19, Yuki discloses the glass is formed by the overflow down-draw method (paragraph [0021]) which will inherently result in an overflow merged surface in the inside. As to claim 20, Yuki discloses a two-step ion exchange method that results in a compressive stress having an inflection point. See Examples 2-4, and Figures 1-2. Claims 1-12 and 15-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Murayama et al. (US 2018/0319706 A1)(Murayama). Yuki discloses a chemically strengthened (i.e., tempered) glass sheet. See paragraph [0020]. Glasses 1, 6 and 7 of Murayama have glass compositions and values for Q, U, W, X, Y and Z that fall within the ranges of instant claims 1-12. See Table 1 of Murayama and the table below showing the values calculated by the examiner for the claimed formulas: Q, U, W, X, Y and Z. An example falling within a claimed range anticipates the range. See MPEP 2131.03. 1 6 7 SiO2 70.00 69.00 70 Al2O3 10.00 9.00 7.5 B2O3 0.10 Li2O 10.00 9.5 8.00 Na2O 3.00 4.50 5.30 K2O 1.00 1.00 1.00 MgO 5.00 6.00 7.00 CaO 0.20 P2O5 6.80 TiO2 0.04 0.04 ZrO2 1.00 1.00 1.00 B2O3+MgO+CaO 5.10 6.00 7.20 R2O/Al2O3 1.40 1.67 1.91 Q 14.40 23.41 22.55 U 7762.86 7244.22 7482.39 W 519.71 438.68 325.25 X 576.48 490.30 356.33 Y 11.17 10.72 10.48 Z 54.40 39.04 21.24 Na2O/Li2O 0.30 0.47 0.66 R2O+Al2O3 24.00 24.00 21.80 Li2O/Al2O3 1.00 1.06 1.07 In the above table, “R2O” means Li2O + Na2O + K2O. The properties of instant claims 15 and 18 are presumed to be inherent to the glasses 1, 6 and 7 because the composition is identical to the presently claimed glass. As to claim 16, Examples 1-10 of Murayama employ anticipatory Glass 1 and are chemically strengthened to a surface compressive stress (CS) 200 to 1400 MPa and a depth of compression (DOL) of 3 to 200 µm. As to claim 17, Examples 16-25 of Murayama employ anticipatory Glass 1 and are chemically strengthened to a depth of compression of 50 to 200 µm and a compressive stress at 30 µm (CS30) of 35 to 400 MPa. See Table 4 of Murayama. In Table 4, the depth compression can be found between the positive (i.e., compressive stress) numbers and the negative (i.e., tensile stress) numbers. As to claim 19, Murayama discloses the glass is formed by the down-draw method (paragraph [0206]) which will inherently result in an overflow merged surface in the inside. As to claim 20, Murayama discloses a two-step ion exchange method (see Table 4) which inherently compressive stress having an inflection point. See Examples 2 and 3, and figures 1-2. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Murayama et al. (US 2018/03197806 A1)(Murayama) OR Yuki et al. (WO 2020/138062 A1)(Yuki) as each is applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Kondo et al. (US 2011/0071012 A1)(Kondo). Each of Murayama and Yuki discloses tempered glass sheets formed by the down-draw method that anticipate claim 1 for the reasons related above. Each reference fails to disclose the inclusion of 0.0001 mol% or more MoO3 to the glass composition. However, MoO3 is a glass colorant which is known to be added to down-draw, chemically strengthened glass compositions. In this regard, Kondo discloses it is known to add colorants such as MoO3 in amounts of less than 1% in order to color down draw glasses that are chemically strengthened. See the title and paragraphs [0068], [0071]. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing to have added any of the colorants disclosed by Kondo including, MoO3, to the glasses of Murayama or Yuki in an amount of less than 1%. The rationale for doing so is that it has been held to have used a known material (i.e., a MoO3 colorant) based upon its suitability for its intended purpose (to color the glass). See MPEP 2144.07. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ping et al. (US 2022/0371942 A1) discloses chemically strengthened aluminosilicate glasses and reports the compressive stress at 30 µm. Hashimoto et al. (US 2012/0052275 A1) discloses molybdenum oxide as a clarifying agent for glass compositions. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to David Sample whose telephone number is (571)272-1376. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 7AM to 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Humera Sheikh can be reached at (571)272-0604. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /David Sample/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1784
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679777
MULTILAYER SINTERED CERAMIC BODY
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679782
COATING LAYER WITH SLOW SIO2 CRYSTALLIZATION RATE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668532
GLASS HAVING VISUAL INTERNAL ROUGHNESS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12662427
CEMENTITIOUS CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL CONTAINING MAGNESIUM OXYCHLORIDE CRYSTALS
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12655059
GLASS ARTICLE COMPRISING N-DOPED GRAPHENE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.1%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 654 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month