Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/859,321

SEALING APPARATUS AND METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 26, 2022 — GB 2206056.0 +2 more
Examiner
SELLS, JAMES D
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Automated Industrial Robotics Wakefield Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 898 resolved
+16.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
912
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
14.6%
-25.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 898 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-8, 10-18 and 20-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Boulanger et al (US Patent 6,456,055) in view of Hase et al (US 2006/0005924). Boulanger discloses a method and apparatus for heat-sealing a dispensing package comprising: a heating apparatus (48) for a sealing roller (50,64) for production of tea bags or coffee bags and comprising sealing surface areas arranged to apply pressure and heat to web material guided into contact with the roller (Fig. 10), the heating apparatus comprising a heater element (74 are resistive rods) configured to extend axially within the roller such that heat generating energy is applied from inside of the roller to a segment of the roller (Fig. 10). However, Boulanger does not disclose that the heater is an induction heater. Regarding this difference, the applicant is directed to the reference of Hase. Hase discloses a system for laminating sheet materials. As shown in Fig. 1, materials F and S are fed between the nip of laminating rolls 21 and 22. These rolls may be heated by an induction heater (see paragraph [0081]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to substitute induction heaters, as taught by Hase, in the apparatus of Boulanger in order to provide the predictable result of facilitating heating of the materials since induction heating and resistance heating are functionally equivalent, alternate expedients in the art. It is the examiner’s position that the specific heater shape, control, configuration and temperature rages claimed are within the purview of one having ordinary skill in the art and would have been obvious to employ in the method and apparatus of Boulanger in view of Hase based on the physical requirements of the materials being sealed. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9 and 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES D SELLS whose telephone number is (571)272-1237. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 8:30-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMES D. SELLS Primary Examiner Art Unit 1745 /JAMES D SELLS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697821
LABEL AFFIXING DEVICE INCLUDING PRINTER PRINTING ON TAPE, CUTTER CUTTING PRINTED TAPE, PEELING PART PEELING LABEL OFF RELEASE MATERIAL, AND AFFIXING PART AFFIXING LABEL TO ADHEREND
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697782
ULTRASONIC WELDING AND RELATED TECHNIQUES FOR LUGGAGE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698122
BENCH-TOP LABEL DISPENSER FOR ACOUSTO-MAGNETIC (AM) ANTI-THEFT LABELS
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12692344
COPOLYMER POLYESTER RESIN AND ADHESIVE COMPOSITION COMPRISING SAME
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692531
CURING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CURING PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE APPLIED TO PRODUCTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 898 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month