Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/859,468

MEASUREMENT REPORT SENDING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND MEASUREMENT REPORT RECEIVING METHOD AND APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022089675
Examiner
O CONNOR, BRIAN T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
783 granted / 915 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
934
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
§103
48.1%
+8.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.8%
-10.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 915 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is in response to Applicant’s preliminary amendment filed on 10/25/2024. Claims 1-10, 13, and 16-22 are currently pending. Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because the abstract is merely one sentence in length. Additional, the abstract is written in a claim format, the claim format is a broad outline of the invention that is written with a legal format. The abstract should be a brief description of the inventive concept that is separate from a claim format. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 16 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claims do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter for the following reasons. With respect to claim 16 and 17, the claims recites a “computer-readable storage medium” and a “computer-readable storage media,” in accordance with applicant’s specification (filed on 10/25/2024) these may be “infrared or microwave” (paragraph [00221]). This subject matter is not one of the statutory categories of invention, it is not a process, machine, manufacture, or a composition of matter. “Infrared or microwave” transmissions are a form of energy and thus does not fall within one of the statutory categories. Claim Rejections – 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 16-18, and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by LI et al. (US 2025/0175836 A1; hereafter LI). With respect to claim 1, LI discloses a method for sending a measurement report (Abstract; Title), performed by a terminal device (UE, 115-a in FIG. 3; UE, 115-b of FIG. 9), comprising: receiving configuration information (935 in FIG. 9; paragraph [0120]) sent by a network side device (Network Entity, 305 in FIG. 3; Network Entity, 905 in FIG. 9); determining a measurement report according to the configuration information (935 in FIG. 9; paragraph [0120]), wherein the measurement report comprises a reference signal identifier of a reference signal, a layer 1-reference signal received power (L1-RSRP) or layer 1-signal to interference plus noise ratio (L1-SINR) (paragraph [0086]), and receiving beam information (paragraph [0101], see the reference signal associated with a beam); and sending the measurement report (940 in FIG. 9) to the network side device (Network Entity, 305 in FIG. 3; Network Entity, 905 in FIG. 9). With respect to claim 2, LI further discloses the method of claim 1, further comprising: acquiring the reference signal identifier according to the configuration information (paragraph [0105], see reference and resource ID); acquiring the L1-RSRP or the L1-SINR corresponding to the reference signal identifier, wherein each receiving beam corresponds to the reference signal identifier (paragraph [0105], see reference and resource ID); acquiring the receiving beam information of each receiving beam (paragraph [0101], see the reference signal associated with a beam). With respect to claim 6, LI further discloses the method according to claim 1, wherein the reference signal comprises at least one of a synchronization signal block (SSB) or a channel state information-reference signal (CSI-RS) (paragraph [0084]). With respect to claim 7, LI discloses a method for receiving a measurement report (Abstract; Title), performed by a network side device (Network Entity, 305 in FIG. 3; Network Entity, 905 in FIG. 9), comprising: sending configuration information (935 in FIG. 9; paragraph [0120]) to a terminal device (UE, 115-a in FIG. 3; UE, 115-b of FIG. 9); receiving a measurement report sent by the terminal device (UE, 115-a in FIG. 3; UE, 115-b of FIG. 9), wherein the measurement report comprises a reference signal identifier of a reference signal, a layer 1-reference signal received power (L1-RSRP) or layer 1-signal to interference plus noise ratio (L1-SINR) (paragraph [0086]), and receiving beam information (paragraph [0101], see the reference signal associated with a beam). With respect to claim 9, LI further discloses the method according to claim 7, wherein the reference signal comprises at least one of a synchronization signal block (SSB) or a channel state information-reference signal (CSI-RS) (paragraph [0084]). With respect to claim 10, LI discloses a terminal device (UE, 115-a in FIG. 3; UE, 115-b of FIG. 9), comprising a processor (1040, 1030 in FIG. 10) and a memory (1040, 1030 in FIG. 10) having a computer program (1035 in FIG. 10) stored thereon, wherein the processor is configured to: receive configuration information (935 in FIG. 9; paragraph [0120]) sent by a network side device (Network Entity, 305 in FIG. 3; Network Entity, 905 in FIG. 9); determine a measurement report based on the configuration information, wherein the measurement report comprises a reference signal identifier of a reference signal, a layer 1-reference signal received power (L1-RSRP) or layer 1-signal to interference plus noise ratio (L1-SINR) (paragraph [0086]), and receiving beam information (paragraph [0101], see the reference signal associated with a beam); and send the measurement report (940 in FIG. 9) to the network side device (Network Entity, 305 in FIG. 3; Network Entity, 905 in FIG. 9). With respect to claim 13, LI discloses a network side device (Network Entity, 305 in FIG. 3; Network Entity, 905 in FIG. 9), configure to execute the method according to claim 7. With respect to claim 16, LI discloses a computer-readable storage medium (paragraph [0009]) for storing instructions (paragraph [0009]), wherein when the instructions are executed, the method according to claim 1 is implemented. With respect to claim 17, LI discloses a computer-readable storage medium (paragraph [0009]) for storing instructions (paragraph [0009]), wherein when the instructions are executed, the method according to claim 7 is implemented. With respect to claim 18, LI further discloses the terminal device of claim 10, wherein the processor is configured to: acquire the reference signal identifier according to the configuration information (paragraph [0105], see reference and resource ID); acquire the L1-RSRP or the L1-SINR corresponding to the reference signal identifier, wherein each receiving beam corresponds to the reference signal identifier (paragraph [0105], see reference and resource ID); acquire the receiving beam information of each receiving beam (paragraph [0101], see the reference signal associated with a beam). With respect to claim 22, LI further discloses the terminal device according to claim 10, wherein the reference signal comprises at least one of a synchronization signal block (SSB) or a channel state information-reference signal (CSI-RS) (paragraph [0084]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 8, and 19-21 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Brian T O'Connor whose telephone number is (571)270-1081. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri Flex 10am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gary Mui can be reached at 571-270-1420. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN T O CONNOR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2465 September 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750858
ADAPTIVE QUANTIZATION PROCEDURES FOR CHANNEL TRACKING REFERENCE SIGNALS TO SUPPORT TRANSMISSION PRE-EQUALIZATION-BASED SYSTEMS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750718
ACCESS POINT AND WIRELESS TERMINAL APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750755
MOBILITY MANAGEMENT METHOD AND COMMUNICATION APPARATUS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739683
Method And Reporting Of The Carrier Phase Measurement Reporting
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726866
Configuring Different Mobility Reporting Trigger Conditions for Reliable Network Connectivity
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 10m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 915 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month