Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/859,476

A METHOD OF FORMING A PROTECTIVE ARTICLE AND 3D PRINTER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 23, 2024
Priority
Apr 26, 2022 — GB 2206059.4 +1 more
Examiner
TENTONI, LEO B
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Tech 21 Licensing Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
1141 granted / 1394 resolved
+16.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1417
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1394 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: On page 1, lines 25-26, mention of claim 1 should be deleted. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Gawryla (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2019/0153181 A1). Regarding claim 1, Gawryla (see the entire document, in particular, paragraphs [0005], [0006], [0008], [0023] – [0026], [0029], [0031], [0035], [0053] and [0069]) teaches a process (see Figure 1, paragraphs [0023] (polymeric foams made by an extrusion method) and [0006] (method of making an extruded foam having improved insulation performance) of Gawryla), including (a) feeding pellets of a first polymer to an extruder (see Figure 1, paragraphs [0008] (introducing a matrix polymer into a screw extruder) and [0023] (polymer in the form of pellets) of Gawryla); (b) feeding pellets of a second polymer, different from and immiscible with the first polymer, to the extruder (see Figure 1, paragraphs [0008] (introducing a domain polymer), [0023] (polymer in the form of pellets; polymeric mixture may include a matrix polymer and a domain polymer) and [0029] (the matrix polymer and the domain polymer are immiscible) of Gawryla); (c) feeding a foaming agent to the extruder (see Figure 1, paragraph [0008] (injecting a blowing agent) of Gawryla); (d) melting the polymers (see Figure 1, paragraph [0024] (obtain a polymeric melt) of Gawryla); (e) mixing the polymers in an extruder screw (see Figure 1, paragraphs [0008] (form a flowable polymeric mixture) and [0025] (the resulting mixture is subjected to blending) of Gawryla); (f) extruding a mixture of the polymers and foaming agent through a 3D printing nozzle (see Figure 1, paragraph [0026] (extrusion composition is forced through die 114 (i.e., nozzle)) of Gawryla); (g) ejecting the mixture from the 3D printing nozzle to create a pressure drop to cause foaming of at least one of the polymers (see Figure 1, paragraph [0026] (extrusion composition exits die 114 into a region of reduced pressure, thereby producing a polymeric foam material) of Gawryla); and (h) forming an article printed from the foam mixture (see paragraphs [0026] (thickness and other properties of the polymeric foam product are controlled) and [0006] (extruded foam having improved insulation performance) of Gawryla). Regarding claim 2, see paragraphs [0031] (matrix polymer includes copolymers of ethylene and vinyl acetate) and [0053] (domain polymers include polycarbonates, polyesters) of Gawryla. Regarding claim 3, see paragraphs [0035] (varying amounts of matrix polymer) and [0056] (varying amounts of domain polymer) of Gawryla. Regarding claim 4, see paragraph [0005] (matrix polymer forms a polymeric foam, domain polymer forms nano-cellular foam) of Gawryla. Regarding claims 5 and 6, see paragraph [0069] (optional additives include elastomers) of Gawryla. Regarding claim 8, see Figure 1, paragraph [0025] (domain polymers, blowing agents and other additives are introduced through a plurality of ports 110, 112) of Gawryla. Claim(s) 9 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Studart et al (EP 3501793 A1). Regarding claim 9, Studart et al (see the entire document, in particular, paragraphs [0001], [0015], [0017], [0020] and [0036]; Figure 1) teaches an apparatus (see paragraph [0001] (3D printing setup) of Studart et al), including (a) a first hopper for pellets of a first material (see Figure 1, paragraphs [0015] (pellet-based 3D printing setup) and [0017] (container 110 for storing one material) of Studart et al); (b) a second hopper for pellets of a second material (see Figure 1, paragraphs [0015] (pellet-based 3D printing setup) and [0017] (container 110’ for storing a different material) of Studart et al); (c) an extruder containing an extruder screw (see Figure 1, paragraph [0020] (extrusion unit 24, extrusion screw 22) of Studart et al); (d) a first conveyor for conveying pellets of a first material from a first hopper to an extruder (see Figure 1, paragraph [0017] (feeding screw 111) of Studart et al); (e) a second conveyor for conveying pellets of a second material from a second hopper to an extruder (see Figure 1, paragraph [0017] (feeding screw 111’) of Studart et al); (f) a heater for melting the first and second materials in an extruder (see Figure 1, paragraphs [0020] (heated extrusion unit 24) and [0036] (cartridge heater in extrusion unit 24) of Studart et al); and (g) a 3D printing nozzle positioned downstream of the extruder screw such that, in use, the extruder screw ejects the melted and mixed materials form the 3D printing nozzle (see Figure 1, paragraph [0020] (extrusion nozzle 243) of Studart et al). Regarding claim 10, see Figure 1, paragraph [0017] (feeding screws 111, 111’) of Studart et al. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gawryla (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2019/0153181 A1) as applied to claims 1-6 and 8 above, and further in view of Knaus (U.S. Patent No. 4,919,864 A). Regarding claim 7, Gawryla does not teach (1) feeding polymers and foaming agent from a single hopper to an extruder. Knaus (see the entire document, in particular, col. 1, lines 5-10; col. 2, lines 26-31; col. 5, lines 43-46; Figure 1) teaches a process (see col. 1, lines 5-10 (method for the manufacture of thermoplastic foams by extrusion) of Knaus), including feeding polymers and foaming agent from a single hopper to an extruder (see Figure 1; col. 5, lines 43-46 (introduce a chemical blowing agent and a resin into one or both hoppers 10a and/or 10b or extruders 11a and/or 11b) of Knaus), and it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to feed polymers and foaming agent from a single hopper to an extruder in the process of Gawryla in view of Knaus in order to produce foams having improved esthetics, strength and durability in a single operation (see col. 2, lines 26-31 of Knaus). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LEO B. TENTONI whose telephone number is (571)272-1209. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30-4:00 ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina A. Johnson can be reached at (571)272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. LEO B. TENTONI Primary Examiner Art Unit 1742 /LEO B TENTONI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 23, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12629888
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12629895
METHODS FOR PRODUCING THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS
2y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624477
A METHOD FOR PROVIDING A FILTERED SPINNING DOPE
2y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12606488
ELECTROCERAMIC COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING IT
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12606497
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR LIMITING VOID FORMATION IN CERAMIC MATRIX COMPOSITE COMPONENTS
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 9m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1394 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month