Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/859,544

OPTICAL IMAGING SYSTEM WITH BUILT-IN OPTICAL FILTER BASED ON SMALL-ANGLE LIGHT PASSING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Apr 26, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022089264
Examiner
CHANG, AUDREY Y
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Nbl Imaging System Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 7m
Est. Remaining
67%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allowance Rate
591 granted / 1267 resolved
-13.4% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
66 currently pending
Career history
1324
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1267 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Remark This Office Action is in response to applicant’s preliminary amendment filed on October 24, 2024, which has been entered into the file. By this amendment, the applicant has amended claims 1-10. Claims 1-10 remain pending in this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 and 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US patent issued to Souma (PN. 8,797,659). Souma teaches, with regard to claim 1, an optical imaging system with an optical diaphragm (14, Figure 1) serves as the built-in optical filter based on small-angle light passing, wherein the system is comprised of a first group of lenes (12 and 13, Figure 1), the optical filter or the optical diaphragm (14) and a second group of lenses (L3) arranged sequentially from an imaging side or surface to an object side or surface. All of the light rays emitted from the second group of lenses are incident to the optical filter at an included angle with an optical axis less than a set angle. The light rays emitted from the optical filter are coupled and imaged on the imaging surface through the first group of lenses. This reference has met all the limitations of claims, but it does not teach explicitly to realize imaging by balancing aberrations via the refraction of light. However, each lens of the plurality of lenses in the first lens group and the second lens group has a definite refractive index, (please see columns 18-22) which means light is refracted by each of the lens. This means the refraction of the light by each lenes would either implicitly balance the aberrations or it is within general level skilled in the art to modify the refraction of light by each of the lenses to achieve the balance of the aberrations. With regard to claim 2, Souma teaches that the from the imaging surface to the object surface, the first group of lenses sequentially comprises a first lens (133), a second lens (132), a third lens (131), the fourth lens (123), the fifth lens (122) and a sixth lens (121, Figure 1) and the second group of lenses comprises a seventh lens (112) and an eighth lens (111). Although this reference does not teach explicitly the spacings between adjacent lenses have the specific values in the claim, such modifications would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to adjust the spacings between the adjacent lenses to achieve the desired imaging property. Claim(s) 1 and 2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US patent issued to Kimura (PN. 8,867,147). Kimura teaches, with regard to claim 1, an optical imaging system with an optical aperture (S, Figure 3) serves as the built-in optical filter based on small-angle light passing, wherein the system is comprised of a first group of lenes (G2, Figure 3), the optical filter or the optical aperture (S) and a second group of lenses (L16 and L15) arranged sequentially from an imaging side or surface to an object side or surface. All of the light rays emitted from the second group of lenses are incident to the optical filter at an included angle with an optical axis less than a set angle. The light rays emitted from the optical filter are coupled and imaged on the imaging surface through the first group of lenses. This reference has met all the limitations of claims, but it does not teach explicitly to realize imaging by balancing aberrations via the refraction of light. However, each lens of the plurality of lenses in the first lens group and the second lens group has a definite refractive index, (please see columns 18-22) which means light is refracted by each of the lens. This means the refraction of the light by each lenes would either implicitly balance the aberrations or it is within general level skilled in the art to modify the refraction of light by each of the lenses to achieve the balance of the aberrations. With regard to claim 2, Kimura teaches that the from the imaging surface to the object surface, the first group of lenses sequentially comprises a first lens (L26), a second lens (L25), a third lens (L24), the fourth lens (L23), the fifth lens (L22) and a sixth lens (L21, Figure 3) and the second group of lenses comprises a seventh lens (L16) and an eighth lens (L15). Although this reference does not teach explicitly the spacings between adjacent lenses have the specific values in the claim, such modifications would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to adjust the spacings between the adjacent lenses to achieve the desired imaging property. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: of the prior art references considered none has disclosed a first lens group, an optical filter and a second lens, arranged from the image surface to the object surface, wherein the first lens group comprises a first to sixth lenses and the second lens group comprises a seventh and eighth lens, as explicitly set forth in claims 1 and 2, that each of the lens has a specific surface radius, thickness, refractive index, dispersion value and diameter as explicitly set forth in claims 3-10. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US patent issued to Masui (PN. 7,911,705) teaches a lens system that is comprised of a first group of lenses, an optical filter and a second group of lenses arranged from imaging surface to object surface, (please see Figure 1). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AUDREY Y CHANG whose telephone number is (571)272-2309. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 9:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephone B Allen can be reached at 571-272-2434. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. AUDREY Y. CHANG Primary Examiner Art Unit 2872 /AUDREY Y CHANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2872
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697833
OPTICAL DEVICES AND METHODS OF MANUFACTURE THEREOF
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693463
OPTICAL APPARATUS INCLUDING MULTILAYERED OPTICAL FILM STRUCTURE AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PLANARIZING THE MULTILAYERED OPTICAL FILM STRUCTURE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693627
Wigner Inverse Transform Based Computer Generated Hologram for Large Object at Far Field From its Perspective Light Field
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12663754
TRANSFLECTIVE DIGITAL HOLOGRAPHIC MICROSCOPE SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12663656
IMAGING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR HOLOGRAPHIC IMAGING OF SAMPLES
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
67%
With Interview (+20.1%)
3y 5m (~1y 7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1267 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month