Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/859,716

Food Quality Indicator

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
May 03, 2022 — SE 2250537-4 +1 more
Examiner
ALLEN, ANDRE J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Innoscentia AB
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
1326 granted / 1451 resolved
+31.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1458
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
17.2%
-22.8% vs TC avg
§102
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1451 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/24/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment Acknowledgement is made of the preliminary amendment(s) filed 10/24/2024. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 11, 12, 14-17, 31, 32 & 35, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Strahle et al (US 20120107191 A1). Regarding claims 1, 35 Strahle et al teaches an ink layer 27 comprising an ink (implied) absorbed on a porous substrate 19 configured to indicate the presence of analytes (Abstract), an adhesive layer [0047][0052][0055][0057], wherein the adhesive layer [0047][0052][0055][0057] is a double-sided adhesive layer [0047][0052][0055][0057] comprising a first side and a second side (figs. 4-6)[0047][0052][0055][0057], a semi-permeable layer [0017][0029][0040][0057] comprising a first surface and a second surface (Figs. 4-6), wherein the semi-permeable layer is permeable to gases and impermeable to liquids [0017][0029][0040][0057], wherein the ink layer 27 is enclosed between the second side of the adhesive layer 27 and the first surface of the semi-permeable layer [0017][0029][0040][0047][0057]. Regarding claim 2 Strahle et al teaches the analytes migrate through the semi-permeable layer to reach the ink layer (Abstract). Regarding claim 11 Strahle et al teaches the semi-permeable layer is non-transparent (Fig. 2E). Regarding claim 12 Strahle et al teaches the semi-permeable layer is configured to be printed on (Figs. 1-6) Regarding claim 14 Strahle et al teaches the ink layer 27and the semi-permeable layer [0017][0029][0040][0057] have different surface areas so the ink layer and the semi-permeable layer can be fastened to the second side of the double-sided adhesive layer (Fig. 1-6) Regarding claims 15 & 37 Strahle et al teaches the first side of the adhesive layer [0047][0052][0055][0057] of the food quality indicator is configured to be attached to a barrier film 23 of a food package (Figs. 1-6) . Regarding claim 16 Strahle et al teaches the first side of the adhesive layer [0047][0052][0055][0057] of the food quality indicator is configured to be attached to a barrier 23 film of a food package (figs. 1-6). Regarding claim 17 Strahle et al teaches a surfactant, a thickening agent, a pigment indicator, a benzopyrone compound, a solvent and a colour enhancer (Abstract) (fig. 1). Regarding claim 31 Strahle et al teaches the porous substrate 19 of the ink layer 27 is selected from cellulose, paper, synthetic paper, polyolefin-based synthetic material, thermoplastic copolyester (TPPE), low-density or high-density polyethylene, low-density or high-density polypropylene, nylon, nonwoven fabric, fabric or polymeric membranes. (Inherent via figs. 1-6) Regarding claim 32 Strahle et al teaches the porous substrate 19 of the ink layer 27 has pores with pore size between 10 pm to 100 pm, with a thickness ranging between 0.05 millimeter to 0.5 millimeter, preferably between 0.05 millimeter to 0.1 millimeter. (Inherent via figs. 1-6) Regarding claim 36 Strahle et al coating the semi-permeable layer with the protective layer prior to applying the ink layer to the semi-permeable layer so that the protective layer is arranged between the semi-permeable layer and the ink layer. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 & 33 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 3 the cited prior art does not anticipate nor render obvious a protective layer that is coated on the first surface of the semi-permeable layer, wherein the protective layer is configured to prevent the migration of ink from the ink layer. Claims 4-8 are objected to due to their dependency of claim 3. Regarding claim 33 the cited prior art does not anticipate nor render obvious preparing a mixture by dissolving a surfactant in a solvent; adding pigment coupled to silane to the mixture;- treating the mixture with ultrasonicating for 10-30 minutes followed by vortex mixing for 20-30 minutes; adding a colour enhancer and a polymer thickening agent to the mixture;- treating the mixture by ultrasonicating the mixture for 10-30 minutes followed by vortex mixing for 20-30 minutes; adding a coupling agent to the mixture; and heating the mixture to 30-60 °C. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. WO 2025116849 A1 DEVELOPMENT OF SMART PACKAGING COMPRISING A COLOR-CHANGING INDICATOR TO MONITOR FRESHNESS/SPOILAGE OF PERISHABLE FOODS IN REAL TIME WO 2020235991 A1 CONDENSATION BARRIER LAYER AND METHOD TO PREPARE THEREOF US 10241099 B2 Film sensor US 9895628 B2 Cover with gas permeable layer JP 4538106 B2 Food quality indicator device US 20060057022 A1 Food quality indicator US 20050153052 A1 Food and beverage quality sensor JP 2002257813 A FOOD QUALITY INDICATOR, PACKAGING PAPER FOR FOOD AND PACKAGING CONTAINER FOR FOOD US 20230127982 A1 INDICATOR FILM US 10247713 B2 Time passage indicator WO 2015104399 A1 Food freshness indicator ink used in a label and food package comprises a varnish comprising film-forming resin or vinyl resin, plasticizer additive and solvents, and metallic salts Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDRE J ALLEN whose telephone number is (571)272-2174. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. 9am-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kristina M Deherrera can be reached at (303) 297-4237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDRE J ALLEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699039
FLEXURAL CORROSION MACHINE ADVANCE MODEL
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698967
INERTIAL SENSOR AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693269
Determining Effects of Acoustic Energy on Fluid and Rock Interactions
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693183
PRESSURE TRANSMITTER WITH MULTI-RANGE PRESSURE SENSOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687472
TENSILE TEST FIXTURE AND ALIGNMENT TOOL FOR TESTING SOFT POLYMERIC FOAMS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 1m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1451 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month