Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/859,838

TERMINAL, BASE STATION, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 24, 2024
Priority
Apr 27, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022019197
Examiner
JEAN BAPTISTE, JERRY T
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
61%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
530 granted / 605 resolved
+27.6% vs TC avg
Minimal -27% lift
Without
With
+-26.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
617
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
§112
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 605 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This office action is in response to the application filed on 10/24/2024. Claims 1-6 have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/24/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant's cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang (US 2023/0171031). Regarding claim 1, Zhang discloses a terminal, comprising: a controller that controls PDCCH overbooking in XDD (Cross Division Duplex) time units where PDCCH monitoring is configured; and a receiver that performs PDCCH monitoring in a PDCCH monitoring occasion selected in the controlled PDCCH overbooking (Zhang, paragraph 23 and claim 9 discloses calculating a number of blind decodes (BD) to be used for the PDCCH reception, based in part on the scaling factors for the SS/CORESET carrying PDCCH repetitions, and, when the number of BDs exceeds a specified limit, implementing overbooking operations to reduce the BD count to within the specified limit… wherein the overbooking operation comprises: dropping certain ones of the configured PDCCH candidates so that the candidates are not searched; and recalculating the number of BDs without including the PDCCH candidates that are dropped). Regarding claim 2, Zhang discloses the terminal as claimed in claim 1, wherein the controller selects the PDCCH monitoring occasion in accordance with a prioritization (Zhang, paragraph 52 discloses if the number of BDs configured for a slot exceeds a maximum specified BD limit, then the slot is considered to be overbooked. In an overbooking scenario, some SS may be prioritized for searching (e.g., PDCCH detection) while other SS are dropped (not searched) so that the UE does not exceed the BD limit). Regarding claim 3, Zhang discloses the terminal as claimed in claim 2, wherein the PDCCH monitoring occasion is selected based on a first prioritization between a common search space and a user specific search space, a second prioritization between a non-XDD search space set and an XDD search space set, and a third prioritization among search space indices (Zhang, paragraph 56 discloses the UE may be configured with different priority orders by higher layers for different search space sets. In case of overbooking, the PDCCH candidate(s) is dropped in an increasing or decreasing order of PDCCH candidates index starting from the lower prioritized search spaces sets. In some designs, to further reduce UE complexity, PDCCH candidates may be dropped on an aggregation level (AL) basis, i.e., once one candidate is dropped for a given AL, all candidates associated with this AL are dropped). Regarding claim 4, Zhang discloses the terminal as claimed in claim 3, wherein the PDCCH monitoring occasion is selected further based on a fourth prioritization between a non-XDD PDCCH monitoring occasion and an XDD PDCCH monitoring occasion (Zhang, paragraph 56 discloses the UE may be configured with different priority orders by higher layers for different search space sets. In case of overbooking, the PDCCH candidate(s) is dropped in an increasing or decreasing order of PDCCH candidates index starting from the lower prioritized search spaces sets. In some designs, to further reduce UE complexity, PDCCH candidates may be dropped on an aggregation level (AL) basis, i.e., once one candidate is dropped for a given AL, all candidates associated with this AL are dropped). Regarding claim 5, Zhang discloses a base station, comprising: a controller that configures a PDCCH monitoring occasion overbooking in XDD (Cross Division Duplex) time units where PDCCH monitoring is configured; and a transmitter that transmits control information in the PDCCH monitoring occasion (Zhang, paragraph 23 and claim 9 discloses calculating a number of blind decodes (BD) to be used for the PDCCH reception, based in part on the scaling factors for the SS/CORESET carrying PDCCH repetitions, and, when the number of BDs exceeds a specified limit, implementing overbooking operations to reduce the BD count to within the specified limit… wherein the overbooking operation comprises: dropping certain ones of the configured PDCCH candidates so that the candidates are not searched; and recalculating the number of BDs without including the PDCCH candidates that are dropped). Regarding claim 6, Zhang discloses a terminal implemented radio communication method, comprising: controlling PDCCH overbooking in XDD (Cross Division Duplex) time units where PDCCH monitoring is configured; and performing PDCCH monitoring in a PDCCH monitoring occasion selected in the controlled PDCCH overbooking (Zhang, paragraph 23 and claim 9 discloses calculating a number of blind decodes (BD) to be used for the PDCCH reception, based in part on the scaling factors for the SS/CORESET carrying PDCCH repetitions, and, when the number of BDs exceeds a specified limit, implementing overbooking operations to reduce the BD count to within the specified limit… wherein the overbooking operation comprises: dropping certain ones of the configured PDCCH candidates so that the candidates are not searched; and recalculating the number of BDs without including the PDCCH candidates that are dropped). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JERRY T JEAN BAPTISTE whose telephone number is (571)272-6189. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Vaughn can be reached at 571-272-3922. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JERRY T JEAN BAPTISTE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2481
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 24, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750482
PICTURE PARTITIONING METHOD AND APPARATUS
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739412
MEDIA COMPRESSION AND DECOMPRESSION USING A GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL THAT ACCEPTS PARTIALLY DECOMPRESSED DATA AS INPUT
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12720077
ENCODER, ENCODING METHOD, DECODER, AND DECODING METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12707059
IMAGE CODING METHOD BASED ON TRANSFORM, AND DEVICE THEREFOR
1y 9m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695916
USE OF GENERAL CONSTRAINT FLAGS ASSOCIATED WITH CODING TOOLS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
61%
With Interview (-26.8%)
2y 1m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 605 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month