Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/860,271

METHODS FOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MECHANISMS BASED ON UNIFIED TCI FOR MTRP

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 25, 2024
Priority
Apr 26, 2022 — provisional 63/335,022 +2 more
Examiner
SORRELL, ERON J
Art Unit
3992
Tech Center
3900
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
266 granted / 328 resolved
+21.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
346
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
§103
44.5%
+4.5% vs TC avg
§102
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 328 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Acknowledgements This is a Non-Final Office Action addressing U.S. Application No. 18/860,271. Based upon a review of the instant application, the actual filing date of the instant application is October 25, 2024. Since the instant application was filed after September 16, 2012, the statutory provisions of the America Invents Act ("AIA ") will govern this proceeding. The preliminary amendment filed October 25, 2024, is acknowledged. Claims 1-12 are pending and examined hereinbelow. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gao et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2023/0284221 hereinafter “Gao”) in view of Zhou et al. (U.S. Pub. No. 2021/0037484 hereinafter “Zhou”). Referring to method claim 1 and apparatus claim 7, Gao teaches a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU), the WTRU comprising a processor operatively coupled to the transceiver and a method implemented by for use in a WTRU, the method comprising: receiving an indication of a first transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state (see figures 3B and 4 and ¶¶ 64-68); receiving a first physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) transmission based on the first TCI state, wherein the first PDCCH transmission includes a first downlink control information (DCI), wherein the first DCI indicates second TCI state and scheduling information for a first physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) (see figures 3B and 4 and ¶¶ 64-68); and sending an acknowledgement (DCI-ACK) for the first DCI and sending HARQ feedback associated with the first PDSCH after sending the DCI-ACK, wherein sending the DCI-ACK confirms reception of the first DCI, and wherein the time duration is a period of time between receiving the PDCCH and a scheduled reception of the first PDSCH reception or a transmission of HARQ feedback associated with the first PDSCH (see figures 3B and 4 and ¶¶ 64-68); and Gao fails to expressly disclose the sending a DCI-ACK for the first DCI and sending the HARQ feedback associated with the first PDSCH after sending the DCI-ACK is on a condition that the time duration is greater than a threshold and on a condition that the time duration is not greater than a threshold, sending the HARQ feedback associated with first PDSCH without sending the DCI-ACK. Zhou teaches, in an analogous system, sending a DCI-ACK for the first DCI and sending the HARQ feedback associated with the first PDSCH after sending the DCI-ACK is on a condition that the time duration is greater than a threshold and on a condition that the time duration is not greater than a threshold, sending the HARQ feedback associated with first PDSCH without sending the DCI-ACK (See Zhou, figure 36 and ¶¶ 336-337). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the Applicant’s invention to modify the teachings of GAO with the above teachings of Zhou. One of ordinary skill would have been motivated to make such modification to inform the network that the DCI was received to prevent retransmission. Referring to method claim 2 and apparatus claim 8, the combination of Gao and Zhou teaches the method of claim 1 and the device of claim 7 (as shown above), and Gao further teaches the HARQ feedback is sent using a second physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource (see Gao, figure 4, ¶¶ 64-68). Referring to method claim 3 and apparatus claim 9, the combination of Gao and Zhou teaches the method of claim 1 and the device of claim 7 (as shown above) and Gao further teaches the DCI-ACK is sent using a first physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resource, wherein the first PUCCH resource is determined based on a RRC configuration or based on an indication in the first DCI (see Gao, figure 3B, ¶¶ 64-68). Referring to method claim 4 and apparatus claim 12, the combination of Gao and Zhou teaches the method of claim 1 and the device of claim 7 (as shown above), and Gao further teaches wherein sending the DCI-ACK confirming reception of the first DCI is further conditioned on determining the second TCI state is different from the first TCI state (see Gao, figure 3B, ¶ 64). Referring to method claim 5 and apparatus claim 11, the combination of Gao and Zhou teaches the method of claim 1 and the device of claim 7 (as shown above), and Gao further teaches wherein sending the DCI-ACK confirming reception of the first DCI is further conditioned on determining the second TCI states is a unified TCI states, wherein the unified TCI states apply to more than one channel type (see Gao, figure 3B, ¶¶ 64-68). Referring to method claim 6 and apparatus claim 12, the combination of Gao and Zhou teaches the method of claim 1 and the device of claim 7, and Gao further teaches receiving the first PDSCH based on the first TCI state (see Gao, figure 3B, ¶¶ 64-68). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references are cited to further show the state of the art as it pertains to the Applicant’s invention: WO 2022/217202 is cited as teaching sending HARQ feedback information for multiple PDSCH as is provided as background information. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ERON J SORRELL whose telephone number is (571)272-4160. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-6PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Fuelling can be reached at 571-270-1367. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Signed: /ERON J SORRELL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3992
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 25, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12757242
METHOD FOR RECEIVING PDSCH, APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING PDSCH AND PROCESSOR-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent RE51060
System providing faster and more efficient data communication
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12745259
CHANNEL TRANSMISSION BEHAVIOR DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUS AND TERMINAL
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12672017
Network Nodes and Methods Therein for Event Monitoring
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12621804
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SELECTING RESOURCE ON BASIS OF LCH IN NR V2X
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+6.0%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month