Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/860,950

METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RANDOM ACCESS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
Apr 28, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0052981 +1 more
Examiner
VU, VIET D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
895 granted / 1065 resolved
+24.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1085
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
§103
71.2%
+31.2% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
11.0%
-29.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1065 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Non-Art Rejection 2. 35 U.S.C. § 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefore, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title". 3. Claims 1-5 and 7-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because the claimed invention is directed to judicial exception (i.e., an abstract idea, law of nature, or nature phenomenon) without significant more. Claims 1-5 and 7-8 recite an abstract idea. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because claims 1-5 and 7-8 are directed to a broad plan, concept or mental process that can be performed in human mind, or by a human using a pen and paper, i.e., identifying certain type of data (valid or invalid) from a report. The instant claims are not positively tied to a particular computer implemented process that accomplishes the claimed method. For instance, it is not clear if the resource configuration information is electronically received from a base station and whether the steps must be performed by the computer terminal. Moreover, claims 1-5 and 7-8 do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the terminal as recited is a generic computing component rather than specific computer component that transforms underlying subject matter. The claims also recite receiving data from a base station which merely indicates the source of the data but still fails to clearly define a computer implemented process because data obtained from the base station could be processed in form of a paper report to be reviewed by human. Since the claim as a whole fail to add significant more to the exception (abstract idea), claims 1-5 and 7-8 do not qualify as a statutory process. 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor. 5. Claims 2 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as failing to set forth the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The following language is vague and indefinite: In claim 1, line 2, “indexes for the second RACH occasions are assigned other than indexes assigned to the first RACH..”, it is not clear as to whether “other than” refers to different index or different assignment method. The same indefiniteness of claim 2 is also applied to claim 11. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 6 and 9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 7. Claims 10 and 12-15 are allowed over prior art of record. Conclusion 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Viet Vu whose telephone number is 571-272-3977. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday through Thursday from 8:00am to 6:00pm. The Group general information number is 571-272-2400. The Group fax number is 571-273-8300. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Emmanuel Moise, can be reached at 571-272-3865. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). /Viet D Vu/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2455 8/24/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12737273
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A PATH CONTAINING A USER ENGAGEMENT TARGET
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730939
THREAT DETECTION USING A MEASURED STORAGE DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12717950
INHERITANCE-BASED ACCESS RIGHTS GOVERNANCE
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12705186
TECHNIQUES AND DEVICES FOR CONFIGURABLE MEMORY ENCRYPTION AND AUTHENTICATION
1y 12m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12695660
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTONOMOUS POLICY CONFLICT DETECTION AND MITIGATION IN OPEN RADIO ACCESS NETWORK (O-RAN) DEPLOYMENTS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+14.1%)
2y 7m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1065 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month