Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/861,078

Terminal, System, and Method for Allocating Resources in Sidelink Localization Procedure

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
Apr 29, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022090451
Examiner
BEAMER, TEMICA M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
908 granted / 1027 resolved
+28.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1046
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§102
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
§112
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1027 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDSs) submitted on December 24, 2024 and June 27, 2025 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-8, 11, 18-20 and 22-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Manolakos et al (Manolakos), U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2021/0297206. Regarding claims 1, 18 and 23, Manolakos discloses a first terminal (assisting UE) (note that the first and second terminals are interchangeable), comprising: an integrated circuit (see figure 4) including a receiver (see figure 4) that receives, from a second terminal (target UE), configuration parameters for a Sidelink (SL) localization procedure in which positioning information of the first terminal is obtained (In a second scenario for sidelink-assisted positioning, none of the target UE and the assisting UEs may have cellular coverage. In this case, the target UE transmits the location request to the assisting UEs over sidelinks established with the respective assisting UEs, and the assisting UEs can select ranging signal (e.g., SL-PRS) time/frequency resources without coordinating with the network.) (0128; see also 0127)); and a processor (see figure 4) configured to: determine, based on the configuration parameters, a resource allocation pattern to be used in an SL transmission procedure, and implement the resource allocation pattern in accordance with the SL transmission procedure to obtain the positioning information (The assisting UEs then send sidelink transmissions to the target UE that include the selected ranging signal configuration in the chosen subchannel. Specifically, unlike the first option, the assisting UEs transmit SCI-2 that includes the ranging signal configurations selected without network involvement. In addition, the assisting UEs first transmit SCI-1 that enables the target UE to decode the subsequent SCI-2, as discussed above with reference to FIG. 9. Once the target UE has the allocated ranging signal configuration to use for the positioning procedure with each assisting UE, it can transmit and receive ranging signals on those resources as discussed above with reference to FIGS. 10 and 11.) (0128; see also 0127). Regarding claims 2 and 19, Manolakos discloses the first terminal/method of claims 1 and 18, further comprising: a transmitter that transmits a broadcasting signal to the second terminal, the broadcasting signal including terminal information and a communication request, wherein the terminal information is information regarding one or more transmission and reception capabilities of the first terminal, and wherein the communication request is signaling requesting a start of the localization procedure (After receiving the connection request 315, the UE 304 may determine whether to accept or reject the connection request 315. The UE 304 may base this determination on a transmission/reception capability, an ability to accommodate the unicast connection over the sidelink, a particular service indicated for the unicast connection, the contents to be transmitted over the unicast connection, or a combination thereof.) (0079). (In a second scenario for sidelink-assisted positioning, none of the target UE and the assisting UEs may have cellular coverage. In this case, the target UE transmits the location request to the assisting UEs over sidelinks established with the respective assisting UEs, and the assisting UEs can select ranging signal (e.g., SL-PRS) time/frequency resources without coordinating with the network. The assisting UEs then send sidelink transmissions to the target UE that include the selected ranging signal configuration in the chosen subchannel.) (0128). Regarding claims 3 and 20, Manolakos discloses the first terminal/method of claims 1 and 18, wherein: the processor is further configured to: identify an SL resources pool including a set of SL resources for communicating directly with the second terminal, determine the resource allocation pattern based on the SL resources pool identified, the resource allocation pattern allocating resources to at least a portion of the set of SL resources in the SL resources pool, and determine the positioning information after the resource allocation pattern is implemented, the positioning information including an absolute location of the first terminal or a relative location of the first terminal with respect to the second terminal (In a second scenario for sidelink-assisted positioning, none of the target UE and the assisting UEs may have cellular coverage. In this case, the target UE transmits the location request to the assisting UEs over sidelinks established with the respective assisting UEs, and the assisting UEs can select ranging signal (e.g., SL-PRS) time/frequency resources without coordinating with the network. The assisting UEs then send sidelink transmissions to the target UE that include the selected ranging signal configuration in the chosen subchannel…Once the target UE has the allocated ranging signal configuration to use for the positioning procedure with each assisting UE, it can transmit and receive ranging signals on those resources as discussed above with reference to FIGS. 10 and 11.) (0128). Regarding claims 5 and 22, Manolakos discloses the first terminal/method of claims 3 and 20, wherein the SL resources pool is an independent SL resources pool selected for the SL localization procedure (the target UE transmits the location request to the assisting UEs over sidelinks established with the respective assisting UEs, and the assisting UEs can select ranging signal (e.g., SL-PRS) time/frequency resources without coordinating with the network. The assisting UEs then send sidelink transmissions to the target UE that include the selected ranging signal configuration in the chosen subchannel.) (0128). Regarding claims 6 and 24, Manolakos discloses the first terminal/method of claims 1 and 23, wherein the processor is further configured to: identify, based on the configuration parameters, an SL reference signal that is used in the Sidelink (SL) localization procedure to obtain the positioning information, and determine the resource allocation pattern based on the SL reference signal identified, the resource allocation pattern allocating resources to include the SL reference signal (In this case, the target UE transmits the location request to the assisting UEs over sidelinks established with the respective assisting UEs, and the assisting UEs can select ranging signal (e.g., SL-PRS) time/frequency resources without coordinating with the network. The assisting UEs then send sidelink transmissions to the target UE that include the selected ranging signal configuration in the chosen subchannel. Specifically, unlike the first option, the assisting UEs transmit SCI-2 that includes the ranging signal configurations selected without network involvement. In addition, the assisting UEs first transmit SCI-1 that enables the target UE to decode the subsequent SCI-2, as discussed above with reference to FIG. 9. Once the target UE has the allocated ranging signal configuration to use for the positioning procedure with each assisting UE, it can transmit and receive ranging signals on those resources as discussed above with reference to FIGS. 10 and 11.) (0128). Regarding claims 7 and 25, Manolakos discloses the first terminal/method of claims 6 and 24, wherein the SL reference signal: an SL-Positioning Reference Signal (PRS) configured to be implemented in a first resource allocation pattern, an SL-Positioning Sounding Reference Signal (PSRS) configured to be implemented in a second resource allocation pattern, or an SL-joint PRS/PSRS (P(S) RS) configured to be implemented in the first resource allocation pattern, the second resource allocation pattern, or a combination of the first resource allocation pattern and the second resource allocation pattern based on terminal information of the first terminal (“positioning reference signal” and “PRS” generally refer to specific reference signals that are used for positioning in NR and LTE systems. .. the terms “positioning reference signal” and “PRS” refer to any type of reference signal that can be used for positioning, such as but not limited to… sounding reference signals (SRS)) (0104)) (0104; see also 0105). Regarding claims 8 and 26, Manolakos discloses the first terminal/method of claims 6 and 24, wherein the resource allocation pattern includes the SL reference signal allocated: in a first slot in which resources for a Physical Sidelink Shared Channel (PSSCH) are allocated, in a second slot in which resources for a Physical Sidelink Feedback Channel (PSFCH) are allocated, or in a third slot in which channel resources are not allocated (Various sidelink physical channels can be transmitted on the resource elements of a slot of a radio frame. A sidelink physical channel corresponds to a set of resource elements carrying information originating from higher layers. The following sidelink physical channels are defined for NR sidelinks: a physical sidelink shared channel (PSSCH), a physical sidelink broadcast channel (PSBCH), a physical sidelink control channel (PSCCH), and a physical sidelink feedback channel (PSFCH). These channels are described in 3GPP Technical Specification (TS) 38.211, which is publicly available and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.) (0101). Regarding claim 11, Manolakos discloses the first terminal of claim 6, wherein the resource allocation pattern includes: in a first slot in which a plurality of resources allocated for the SL reference signal are interposed with a plurality of unused resources, or in a second slot in which the plurality of resources allocated for the SL reference signal are interposed (shared) with a plurality of resources allocated for a Physical Sidelink Shared Channel (PSSCH) (the time domain resources for SL-PRS transmissions may be derived based on a deterministic function of the subchannel of the PSCCH or PSSCH associated with the location request. One PSCCH can schedule multiple PSSCHs.) (0131). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 4, 9, 10 and 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Manolakos. Regarding claims 4 and 21, Manolakos discloses the first terminal/method of claims 3 and 20 as described above. Manolakos, however, fails to specifically disclose wherein the SL resources pool is an existing SL resources pool previously configured for the SL transmission. The examiner contends, however, that using existing resources from previously configured transmissions is well-known in the art and the examiner takes official notice as such. Therefore, before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to implement such a method to help preserve system resources and help reduce the load of the system. Regarding claim 9, Manolakos discloses the first terminal of claim 6 as described above. Manolakos, however, fails to disclose wherein the processor is further configured to: implement a first collision protocol when resources allocated for the SL reference signal interact with resources allocated for a Demodulation Reference Signal (DMRS) in the resource allocation pattern, implement a second collision protocol when resources allocated for the SL reference signal interact with resources allocated for a Physical Sidelink Control Chanel (PSCCH) in the resource allocation pattern, and implement a third collision protocol when resources allocated for the SL reference signal interact with resources allocated for a Phase Tracking Reference Signal (PT-RS) in the resource allocation pattern. It should be noted that Manolakos does provide techniques for avoiding positioning reference signals collisions based on a deterministic function of various parameters derived relative to either the time/frequency resources carrying the SCI-1/SCI-2 that contains the assisting UE's response to a location request, or the time/frequency resources of the PSCCH and/or the PSSCH that included the location request (0130). Therefore, before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Manolakos with the collision protocols described as such would have been a system design choice that would require only routine skill in the art to implement. Regarding claim 10, Manolakos discloses the first terminal of claim 6 as described above and further discloses wherein the processor is further configured to implement the resource allocation pattern inherently in a specific sub-channel with an inherent sub-channel size based on the configuration parameters (the time domain resources for SL-PRS transmissions may be derived based on a deterministic function of the subchannel of the PSCCH or PSSCH associated with the location request. One PSCCH can schedule multiple PSSCHs.) (0131). Manolakos is, however, silent to a specific sub-channel size being equal or greater than a Physical Sidelink Shared Channel (PSSCH) sub-channel size. However, before the effective filing date, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to modify Manolakos with the sub-channel sizing as described as such modification would have been a system design choice that would require only routine skill in the art to implement. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yerramalli et al. U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2024/0406913 discloses a sidelink position estimation procedure coordinated via a relay wireless node. Manolakos et al. U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2024/0098683 discloses management of resource pools for positioning in sidelink. Keating et al. U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2024/0022375 discloses coordinated positioning via sidelink resource. Balasubramanian et al. U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2022/0014872 discloses vehicle-to-pedestrian positioning with user equipment and network assistance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TEMICA M. BEAMER whose telephone number is (571)272-7797. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew D. Anderson can be reached at 571-272-4177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TEMICA M BEAMER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2646
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739744
TERMINAL AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732398
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ACQUIRING CHANNEL IMAGES
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726893
5G TO WI-FI NETWORK SLICE MAPPING
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726265
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CELL (RE)SELECTION IN EMB-BASED NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORK
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12720381
SEAMLESS MOBILITY FOR WIRELESS DEVICES
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+4.2%)
2y 3m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1027 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month