Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/861,115

LIGHTING DEVICE AND VEHICLE LAMP

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
May 17, 2022 — JP 2022-080878 +1 more
Examiner
CHAI, RAYMOND REI-YANG
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
419 granted / 561 resolved
+6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
589
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
79.9%
+39.9% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 561 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Acknowledgement is made of the preliminary amendment submitted on 10/28/2024. In virtue of this amendments: Claim 5 is currently amended; and thus, Claims 1-7 are pending; Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of this application’s status as a 371 of PCT/JP2023/017120 filed on 05/02/2023. Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy of JP2022-080878 filed on 05/17/2022 has been received/retrieved by the office. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 10/28/2024 and 05/05/2025 has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US2017/0015237A1 hereinafter “Okumura” Regarding claim 1, Okumura disclose a lighting device (¶32L5: headlights) comprising: a first lighting circuit (¶33L2: a main headlight control apparatus) that turns on a first light source (¶32L5: headlights [10A]) when a state of a first signal satisfies a first condition (¶10L1-3: the first control apparatus turns on/off the first lamp under a condition that a light -on/off command is inputted) and changes a brightness of the first light source according to the state of the first signal (¶38L1-8: drive unit configured to adjusting a light quantity of the main headline over a range from zero to 100%); a second lighting circuit (¶33L6-10: auxiliary headlight control apparatus) that turns on a second light source (¶35L9: an auxiliary headlight [10B]) when a state of a second signal satisfies a second condition (¶11L1-11: the second control apparatus turns on/off the second lamp under a condition that the auxiliary light-on/off command is inputted) different from the first condition (Note: light on/off command is different than auxiliary light-on/off command) and changes a brightness of the second light source according to the state of the second signal (¶44L1-11: the drive unit [33] is configured to adjusting a light quantity of the auxiliary headlight over a range from zero to 100% based on the control signal) ; and a first output circuit (¶47L1: body ECU [40]) that outputs, to the first lighting circuit, the first signal whose state changes from a first initial state satisfying the first condition such that the first light source is turned on and is gradually brightened (¶10L8-12: in light-on/light-off control of the first lamp, the first lamp is turned on such that the light quantity gradually increase/decrease), and outputs, to the second lighting circuit, the second signal whose state changes from a second initial state satisfying the second condition such that the second light source is turned on and is gradually brightened (¶11L7-11: in light-on/light-off control of the second lamp, the second lamp is turned on such that the light quantity gradually increase/decrease), based on an instruction signal (¶47L7-10: body ECU inputs the light-on/off command based on an operating signal from the sensors/switch). Regarding claim 7, Okumura disclose a lighting device (¶32L5: headlights) for turning on a first light source (¶32L5: headlights [10A]) and a second light source (¶35L9: an auxiliary headlight [10B]) attached to a vehicle (¶32L1-5: headlights that are mounted in a vehicle), comprising: a first lighting circuit (¶33L2: a main headlight control apparatus) that turns on the first light source (¶32L5: headlights [10A]) when a state of a first signal satisfies a first condition (¶10L1-3: the first control apparatus turns on/off the first lamp under a condition that a light -on/off command is inputted) and changes a brightness of the first light source according to the state of the first signal (¶38L1-8: drive unit configured to adjusting a light quantity of the main headline over a range from zero to 100%); a second lighting circuit (¶33L6-10: auxiliary headlight control apparatus) that turns on the second light source (¶35L9: an auxiliary headlight [10B]) when a state of a second signal satisfies a second condition (¶11L1-11: the second control apparatus turns on/off the second lamp under a condition that the auxiliary light-on/off command is inputted) different from the first condition (Note: light on/off command is different than auxiliary light-on/off command) and changes a brightness of the second light source according to the state of the second signal (¶44L1-11: the drive unit [33] is configured to adjusting a light quantity of the auxiliary headlight over a range from zero to 100% based on the control signal) ; and a first output circuit (¶47L1: body ECU [40]) that outputs, to the first lighting circuit, the first signal whose state changes from a first initial state satisfying the first condition such that the first light source is turned on and is gradually brightened (¶10L8-12: in light-on/light-off control of the first lamp, the first lamp is turned on such that the light quantity gradually increase/decrease), and outputs, to the second lighting circuit, the second signal whose state changes from a second initial state satisfying the second condition such that the second light source is turned on and is gradually brightened (¶11L7-11: in light-on/light-off control of the second lamp, the second lamp is turned on such that the light quantity gradually increase/decrease), when a door of the vehicle is unlocked.(¶47L7-10: body ECU inputs the light-on/off command based on an operating signal from the switch; ¶46L1-8: the ECU manages other equipment such as door lock). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 2-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okumura in view of US2015/0145574A1 hereinafter “Fujiwara” Regarding claim 2, Okumura discloses the lighting device according to claim 1 Okumura does not expclitly disclose: the first lighting circuit performs PWM lighting of the first light source, and the second lighting circuit performs PWM lighting of the second light source. Fujiwara discloses a PWM generation circuit used for supplying power to LED circuits (¶47L1-7: generate a PWM signal, the power supply drives a light emitting diode as a load circuit) It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art prior to the effective filing date of the application to utilize the PWM power supply disclose by Fujiwara as the driving circuit disclosed by Okumura. One of ordinary skill in the art would’ve been motivated because PWM driven LED circuit is well known and common in the art, in addition, the PWM circuit disclosed by Fujiwara makes it possible to output a soft-start-controlled PWM signal even immediately after starting the process of generating the PWM signal. (¶15L1-5) Regarding claim 3, Okumura in view of Fujiwara hereinafter “Okumura/Fujiwara” disclose the lighting device according to claim 2, wherein the first output circuit outputs, as the first signal, a first PWM signal whose first duty ratio changes from a first initial value satisfying the first condition, and outputs, as the second signal, a second PWM signal whose second duty ratio changes from a second initial value satisfying the second condition, based on the instruction signal, (Fujiwara ¶13L1-30: the PWM signal generation unit includes a duty setting unit configured to designating a duty ratio corresponding to each period PWM signal on the basis of initial duty setting, a target duty setting signal, a slope setting signal) the first lighting circuit performs the PWM lighting of the first light source in synchronization with the first PWM signal, and changes the brightness of the first light source according to the first duty ratio of the first PWM signal (Okumura ¶38L1-8: drive unit configured to adjusting a light quantity of the main headline over a range from zero to 100%), and the second lighting circuit performs the PWM lighting of the second light source in synchronization with the second PWM signal, and changes the brightness of the second light source according to the second duty ratio of the second PWM signal. (Okumura ¶44L1-11: the drive unit [33] is configured to adjusting a light quantity of the auxiliary headlight over a range from zero to 100% based on the control signal) Regarding claim 4, Okumura/Fujiwara disclose the lighting device according to claim 3, wherein the first output circuit changes the first duty ratio and the second duty ratio such that the brightness of each of the first light source and the second light source reaches a predetermined brightness in a predetermined period after each of the first light source and the second light source has been turned on. (Fujiwara ¶13L1-30: the PWM signal generation unit includes a duty setting unit configured to designating a duty ratio corresponding to each period PWM signal on the basis of initial duty setting, a target duty setting signal, a slope setting signal) Claims 5-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okumura in view of Machine Translation of WO2015/170403A1 hereinafter “Okamoto” Regarding claim 5, Okumura discloses the lighting device according to claim 1 Okumura does not expclitly disclose: a third lighting circuit that turns on a third light source when a state of a third signal satisfies a third condition and changes a brightness of the third light source according to the state of the third signal; and a second output circuit that outputs, to the third lighting circuit, the third signal whose state changes from a third initial state satisfying the third condition such that the third light source is turned on and is gradually brightened based on the instruction signal. Okamoto discloses a vehicle control system with a vehicle lamp comprising of a first, a second and a third lighting unit. (Page.2 L25-29: vehicle headlamp includes a first lamp unit, a second lamp unit and a third lamp unit) being control by a control unit. (Page.3 L32-33: the light source change based on a control signal output from the control unit) It would have been obvious to one ordinarily skilled in the art prior to the effective filing date of the application to modify the headlamp disclosed by Okumura to include a third lamp unit having as shown in Fig.2 of Okamoto. One of ordinary skill in the art would’ve been motivated because an additional lamp can provide more versatility to the headlamp of the vehicle, as the third lamp can act as a variable beam lamp unit (Okamoto Page.3 L28-33) and it has been held that mere duplication of the essential working parts of a device involves only routine skill in the art. St, Regis Paper Co. v. Bemis Co., 193 USPQ 8. Regarding claim 6, Okumura in view of Okamoto hereinafter “Okumura/Okamoto” discloses in Okamoto the vehicle lamp comprising: the lighting device according to claim 5 (as rejected above); and the first to third light sources arranged at a front of the vehicle, wherein the second light source is disposed between the first light source and the third light source. (as shown in Fig.2 for example) Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAYMOND R CHAI whose telephone number is (571)270-0576. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander H Taningco can be reached at (571)272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Raymond R Chai/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2844
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12671057
ANTENNA FOR INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA EXCITATION, ANTENNA UNIT FOR INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA EXCITATION, AND PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672222
Content System with Lighting Device Calibration Feature
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668174
VEHICLE HEADLIGHT
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672221
DETERMINING OUTPUT INFORMATION BASED ON A RECOMMENDED USE OF A LIGHTING SYSTEM
1y 12m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663335
METHOD FOR MEASURING PARAMETERS OF ROADWAY LOW-POSITION LIGHTING FIXTURES
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+16.0%)
1y 10m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 561 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month