Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/861,124

MOUNTING ELEMENT FOR A VERTICALLY ADJUSTABLE INSTALLATION OF A RUNNER RAIL IN A POCKET DRYWALL CONSTRUCTION

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 28, 2024
Priority
May 09, 2022 — EU PCT/EP2022/000044 +1 more
Examiner
TRIGGS, ANDREW J
Art Unit
3635
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Knauf Gips KG
OA Round
2 (Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
734 granted / 1101 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
1134
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.2%
-14.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1101 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The Examiner acknowledges Claim 1 has been amended and Claims 9-12 have been added. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments and amendments with respect to the Prior Art rejections have been considered but are moot because the amendment(s) have necessitated a new ground(s) of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by German Patent DE 44 12 505 to Nyhuis. Regarding claim 1, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, a mounting element [device for fastening (Page 1)] comprising: a mounting plate (21) and a mounting angle (1); wherein the mounting plate (21) has a first raster profile (23) and the mounting angle (1) has a second raster profile (16) complementary [grooves bear against mating flanges (Abstract)] to the first rater profile (23); and wherein the second raster profile (16) of the mounting angle is configured to be interlocked [bear against (Abstract)] with the first raster profile (23) of the mounting plate (21) in different relative vertical positions [grooves that extend in the longitudinal direction (Page 2)] of the mounting angle (1) with respect to the mounting plate (21) to allow for the mounting angle (1) to be adjustably fastened (Page 2) to the mounting plate (21). Regarding claim 2, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the mounting plate (21) is configured as a U-shaped mounting bracket (3) (Page 2), wherein a first side element (4) and a second side element (5) of the U-shaped mounting bracket (3) comprise female joint elements [because of the holes through them]. Regarding claim 3, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the mounting plate (21) has at least one guiding element (26), which is formed in such a way as to guide a sliding movement (Page 3) of the mounting angle (1) along the mounting plate (21). Regarding claim 4, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the mounting plate (21) has two guiding elements [top and bottom edges] that are configured as abutting edges aligned in parallel. Regarding claim 5, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the mounting plate (21) comprises height indication means [the upper edge of the mounting plate] capable of indicating the relative vertical position of the mounting angle (1) with the mounting plate (21) [the upper edge would correspond to one of the grooves in the mounting angle]. Regarding claim 6, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the mounting angle (1) comprises at least one slit (12) designed to fit a screw (25) for vertically adjustable connection (Page 3) of the mounting angle (1) to the mounting plate (21). Regarding claim 7, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the mounting angle (1) comprises at least one hole (12) designed to fit a screw (25) for additionally fixing the mounting angle (1) to the mounting plate (21). Regarding claim 8, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the first raster profile (23) and the second raster profile (16) is formed as a triangular-shaped profile [V-shaped (Page 3)]. Regarding claim 9, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the first raster profile (23) and the second raster profile (16) are configured such that engagement between the first raster profile (23) and the second raster profile (16) defines discrete relative vertical positions [due to the longitudinal grooves (Page 2)] of the mounting angle (1) with respect to the mounting plate (21). Regarding claim 10, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, the discrete relative positions are defined by regularly spaced raster steps [as seen by the grooves 16 and 23]. Regarding claim 11, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, engagement of the first raster profile (23) with the second raster profile (16) provides predefined adjustment steps (Page 3) between the mounting angle (1) and the mounting plate (21). Regarding claim 12, Nyhuis teaches in Figures 1-3, relative vertical adjustment (Page 3) of the mounting angle (1) with respect to the mounting plate (21) is achieved through engagement of the first raster profile (23) with the second raster profile (16). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW J TRIGGS whose telephone number is (571)270-3657. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs 6am-2pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Mattei can be reached at (571) 270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW J TRIGGS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 28, 2024
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 31, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747720
METHOD FOR INSTALLING WIND POWER GENERATOR AND WIND POWER GENERATION SYSTEM
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745714
FILL UNDER GRAIN COVER
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735896
lateral intermediate flashing element for connecting lateral longitudinal flashing elements, a kit comprising such flashing elements, and a method of flashing two roof elements positioned adjacent each other at different altitudes along a slanted roof
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12723400
ANCHOR BOLT APPARATUS
1y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12698632
MODULAR BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+27.8%)
2y 4m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1101 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month