Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/861,740

BRACKET, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERCONNECTING FURNITURE PARTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 30, 2024
Examiner
MCDUFFIE, MICHAEL D
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Siso A/S
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
57%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
570 granted / 845 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -10% lift
Without
With
+-10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
860
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.1%
+12.1% vs TC avg
§102
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 845 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following correspondence is a non-final Office Action for application # 18861740, entitled: BRACKET, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTERCONNECTING FURNITURE PARTS, filed on 10/30/2024. Claims 1-10 are pending. Election/Restrictions Claims 9-10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 11/13/2025. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I. (claims 1-8) in the reply filed on 11/13/2025 is acknowledged. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Benoit (DE 202020101382). Regarding claim 1, Benoit discloses a bracket 1 for interconnecting two furniture parts S,B, the bracket 1 having a first end and a second end (as seen in Fig. 6 below), and a base (as seen in Fig. 6 below) with a lower surface for facing and interconnection with a first furniture part S and an upper surface, the bracket 1 having at least one wall element 7 projecting from the upper surface (as shown in Fig. 6 below), and for facing and interconnection with an identical second bracket 1 arranged on a second furniture part B (as seen in Fig. 9), the at least one wall element 7 and the base 1 defining a channel (as seen in Fig. 5 below) configured to receive and interconnect with at least one wall element 7 of the second bracket 1, and the bracket 1 further comprising a fixed stop (as shown in Fig. 5 below) within the channel at a central longitudinal position of the bracket 1, for interacting with an identical stop on the second bracket 1 (see Figs. 7-9), for preventing movement between the brackets 1,1 beyond the stop, characterized in that wherein the channel is open at the first and second end, such that the at least one wall element 7 of the second bracket 1 may be is inserted into the channel from either end. Regarding claim 2, Benoit discloses the bracket 1, where the at least one wall element 7 comprises a connection flange (as seen in Fig. 5 below) extending from the wall element 7 at an upper end thereof, such that when the bracket 1 has been connected to the second bracket 1, the connection flange (as seen in Fig. 5) prevents the brackets 1,1 from being disengaged in a direction transverse in relation to a longitudinal direction of the channel (as seen in Fig. 9). Regarding claim 3, Benoit discloses the bracket 1, where the connection flange only spans part of a longitudinal direction of the bracket 1. Regarding claim 4, Benoit discloses the bracket 1, where the stop (shown in Fig. 5 below) is arranged on at least one of the connection flange, the wall element 7, or the base 1 in the channel between the connection flange and the upper surface of the base 1 (as seen in Fig. 6 below). Regarding claim 8, Benoit discloses a system comprising: a bracket 1 according to claim 1, and the second bracket 1 (as seen in Figs. 7-9). PNG media_image1.png 384 455 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 213 422 media_image2.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5-7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art of record fails to teach or disclose the brackets of claim 1, where an upper part of the at least one wall element comprises a concave shape, or where the bracket comprises a first wall element extending along a first side of the base, and a second wall element extending parallel with the first wall element towards an opposite second side of the base, the second wall element extending a shorter distance along the base compared to the first wall element. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. In addition to the reference to Benoit above, the Examiner submits the Notice of References Cited (PTO-892). The listed references are drawn to mounting systems capable of securing furniture parts together. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL D MCDUFFIE whose telephone number is (571)272-3832. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at 571-272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michael McDuffie/Examiner, Art Unit 3632 23-Jan-26 /TERRELL L MCKINNON/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594892
TWEETER FLUSH, SURFACE, AND STARFISH MOUNT INSTALLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12440073
Tube Holder With Retractable Barrier(s)
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 14, 2025
Patent 12318022
FLAT-PACK LIQUID DISPENSING STATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 03, 2025
Patent 12323088
SOLAR PANEL SUPPORT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 03, 2025
Patent 12320083
Cable Barrier With Dual-Column Posts
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 03, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
57%
With Interview (-10.4%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 845 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month