Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/861,786

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING MULTICAST DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION OPERATIONS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 30, 2024
Priority
May 06, 2022 — provisional 63/338,902 +2 more
Examiner
ROUDANI, OUSSAMA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
382 granted / 479 resolved
+19.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+7.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
507
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
55.7%
+15.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.8%
-26.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 479 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 02/19/2025 and 07/06/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10, 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Shrivastava et al. (US 20240187823). Regarding claim 1, Shrivastava discloses a method for performing operations by a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system (FIG. 16 illustrates an embodiment of the system 1600 for efficient and reliable reception of NR MBS; [0299]), the method comprising: receiving a Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) addressed to a Cell-Radio Network Temporary Identifier (C-RNTI) for a Hybrid Automatic Repeat and request (HARQ) process (UE 10 may receive a. the PDCCH indicating the DL transmission addressed to the G-RNTI or the G-CS-RNTI, or the C-RNTI or the CS RNTI. gNB 20 can configure which retransmission (ReTx) is used, as illustrated by the method 210 in FIG. 2b. One of the following kinds of ReTx may be expected or configured: at step 212, start drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL for the corresponding HARQ process; [0116-0120]); receiving a Physical Downlink Shard Channel (PDSCH) including a Medium Access Control (MAC) Protocol Data Unit (PDU) based on the PDCCH, wherein the MAC PDU includes a discontinuous reception (DRX) command MAC control element (CE) (MBS DRX Command MAC CE and/or a MBS Long DRX Command MAC CE may be signaled to the UE 10 which is receiving the PTM MBS. The MAC CEs may be identified with specific LC IDs (logical channel identities) and/or mapped to the physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) and addressed with the G-RNTI or G-CS-RNTI used for the relevant PTM MBS; [0078]); and based on the MAC PDU further including multicast data, performing a multicast DRX operations based on the DRX command MAC CE (upon receiving, by the UE (10), one of a MBS DRX command medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) or a MBS Long DRX command MAC CE for the MBS multicast service, at least one of the following timers is stopped: the drx-on-DurationTimerMBS timer and the drx-InactivityTimerMBS timer for the pertinent MBS; [0318]). Regarding claim 2, Shrivastava discloses based on the MAC PDU further including unicast data, performing a unicast DRX operations based on the DRX command MAC CE (if the PTP DRX is the same as the unicast DRX, even though PTP has same DRX configuration as that for unicast reception, then with the PTM MBS reception, there can be linkage between the PTM and the PTP (for example, for HARQ retransmission). As a result, the unicast active time may be activated when PTM reception is pursued. However, decoding the unicast reception in the extended unicast DRX active can cause significant PDCCH blind decoding for C-RNTI/CS-RNTI, while the gNB 20 may not have any unicast data available for scheduling. With distinct PTP-RNTI, the UE 10 may be scheduled only for PTP reception, when the PTM reception is pursued and requires HARQ retransmission, whereas unicast C-RNTI/CS-RNTI allocation may be pursued in the original DRX active time. This way unicast reception and associated operations, for example, channel state information reference signal (CSIRS) measurements, CSI reporting etc. may not be affected by PTM reception; [0236]). Regarding claim 3, Shrivastava discloses wherein, based on the MAC PDU further including the multicast data, the PDSCH is considered as a retransmission of a previously transmitted PDSCH for the multicast data (if at step 222, the PDCCH indicates a DL transmission for G-RNTI or G-CS-RNTI, or C-RNTI or CS-RNTI (scheduling MBS PDSCH), the MAC entity 40 may: at step 224, if only PTP ReTx is expected (or configured): Start drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL; and If drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL is expired and the data of the corresponding HARQ process was not successfully decoded: start drx-RetransmissionTimerDL for the corresponding HARQ process in the first symbol after the expiry of drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerDL. at step 226, if only PTM ReTx is expected (or configured): Start drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerMBS; and If drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerMBS is expired and the data of the corresponding HARQ process was not successfully decoded: start the drx-RetransmissionTimerMBS for the corresponding HARQ process in the first symbol after the expiry of drx-HARQ-RTT-TimerMBS; [0125-0132]). Regarding claim 4, Shrivastava discloses wherein, based on the MAC PDU further including the unicast data, the PDSCH is considered as an initial transmission (Each DRX (unicast and MBS) has its own parameters and timers. After initial PTM (by G-RNTI, Group-Radio Network Temporary Identifier or by G-CS-RNTI, Group-Configured Scheduling-Radio Network Temporary Identifier) HARQ transmission, PTP (by C-RNTI, Cell-Radio Network Temporary Identifier or by CS-RNTI, Configured Scheduling-Radio Network Temporary Identifier) HARQ retransmission can be performed; [0060]). Regarding claim 5, Shrivastava discloses based on there being a previously received PDCCH transmission addressed to a group-RNTI (G-RNTI) for the HARQ process, performing the multicast DRX operations based on the DRX command MAC CE (MBS DRX Command MAC CE and/or a MBS Long DRX Command MAC CE may be signaled to the UE 10 which is receiving the PTM MBS. The MAC CEs may be identified with specific LC IDs (logical channel identities) and/or mapped to the physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) and addressed with the G-RNTI or G-CS-RNTI used for the relevant PTM MBS. Different types of MBS could pertain to low latency and high latency requirements and dynamic scheduling aspects. Therefore, DRX configuration for these services can have short DRX cycle and/or long DRX cycle parameters configured. The network can also dynamically alter the DRX operation between short DRX cycle and long DRX cycle with utilizing at least one of the MAC CEs. In one embodiment, the configuration for short DRX cycle and/or long DRX cycle and associated MAC CEs usage can be limited to the MBS multicast services being availed in connected mode only and/or broadcast services; [0078]). Regarding claim 6, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 1. Regarding claim 7, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 2. Regarding claim 8, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 3. Regarding claim 9, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 4. Regarding claim 10, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 5. Regarding claim 12, the claim is interpreted and rejected for the reasons cited in claim 1. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chin et al. (US 20220286818), “METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT FOR MANAGEMENT OF MBS DATA RECEPTION.” Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OUSSAMA ROUDANI whose telephone number is (571)272-4727. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached at (571) 272 7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OUSSAMA ROUDANI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 30, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744632
Wireless Communication Method and Apparatus
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739929
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ANTENNA CONTROL METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12726992
CONTROL INFORMATION DCI TRANSMISSION METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719628
INTERLEAVING ACROSS CBGS AND ENHANCED MAPPING FOR SBFD SLOTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12706709
DETERMINATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION NODE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+7.6%)
2y 11m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 479 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month