Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/862,176

WAREHOUSE FOR STORING BATTERY UNIT AND SKID USED IN SAME

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Priority
May 20, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022020928
Examiner
MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Jgc Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
883 granted / 1053 resolved
+31.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1079
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
87.6%
+47.6% vs TC avg
§102
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1053 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 4, 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Akao (JP2002087516) in view of Ebizawa et a (JP6912125). Referring to claim 1. Akao discloses a “Vehicular Battery Replacing Device”. See Figs. 1-7 and respective portions of the specification. Akao futher discloses a “Vehicular Battery Replacing Device”. See Figs. 1-7 and respective portions of the specification. Akao futher discloses a battery unit storage warehouse, comprising: a skid/rack (5) configured to hold a batteries stacked in multiple stage; an overhead crane/forklift (11), configured to stacked the skid/bucket and remove the skid (See at least Sect. 0006, 0012, 0014-0015, 0019). Moreover, Akao discloses charging means (8) connected to the stored batteries via the rack structure. Thus, Akao teaches a skid configured to hold a battery unit, an overhead crane configured to stack and remove the skids and a conductor/charging pathway connected to stored battery units. Akao doesn’t disclose a terminal connectable to a battery unit through which a conductor is electrically connected to the battery unit when the skid is stacked or control device, configured to control the overhead crane. Ebizawa et al (herein “Ebizawa”) discloses a “Used Battery Unit Holder And Used Battery Unit Storage System”. See Figs. 1-12 and respective portions of the specification. Ebizawa further discloses a holder used for a battery unit comprising a main holder body (10) that holds the battery unit and a connection portion (30) on the holder that electrically connects the held battery unit to an external conductor (930) of the storage device (See Sect. 0044-0045, 0048-0049, 0056). Specifically, the connection portion (30) includes a battery side connector (330) connected to the battery unit’s electrode terminals and a connection circuit-side connector (330) connected to the storage device’s external connection circuit, so that attaching the holder to the storage device completes the electrical pathway from the battery unit through the holder mounted terminal to the external conductor (See Sect. 0049, 0056). Thus, Ebizawa teaches a terminal (connection portion 30, batter side connector 31) connectable to the battery unit through intermediation of that terminal when the holder is placed in the storage device. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the Akao’s crane based stackable battery storage system to incorporate Akao’s holder mounted terminal/connection structure, in order to enable the battery units stored in the rack to be electrically accessed without requiring separate manual wiring for each stored unit and to provide an electronic control device to direct crane operations in an automated storage and retrieval system as this is well known in the field to do and would have been beneficial as a way of automating crane operations via a control device to perform stacking and retrieval tasks, which would reduce slow manual operations and increase throughput. Referring to claim 2. Akao in view of Ebizawa disclose the combination as set forth above as applied to claim 1. Claim 2 further requires that the battery unit storage warehouse be configured to allow the battery unit held on the skid to store electric power and allow a supply of electric power from the battery unit via the conductor. Akao discloses charging means (8) that charges that stored batteries (3) (Sect. 0023), thus teaching a storage system configured to allow the battery unit held in the carrier (7) to store electric power. Ebizawa discloses that charge/discharge unit (530) of the holder discharges the stored battery units and that the discharged electric power is supplied to an external load in or around the facility where the storage device is installed via an inverter provided in the storage device (Sect. 0072), wherein the external load receives power via the connection circuit (930, the external conductor of the storage device) (Sect. 0056), thus teaching supplying electric power from the stored battery unit via the external conductor to an external load. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Akao incorporate the teachings of Ebizawa so the combined system was configured to support bidirectional power flow with both storing and supplying electric power. Referring to claims 4, 6. Akao in view of Ebizawa disclose the combination as set forth above as applied to claim 1. Claim 4 further requires that the control device be configured to control the overhead crane to remove the battery unit with a reduced capacity. Akao discloses an overhead crane (1) used to remove bucket/carrier and battery assemblies from the storage zones (24, 25) of the rack (See Sect. 0021-0024, 0026). Akao does not disclose the control device is configured to control the overhead crane to remove a battery unit with a reduced capacity. Ebizawa discloses a battery state recognition unit (70) that recognizes the state of the battery stored in the battery units, including current value, voltage value and temperature sensors (See Sect. 0053-0054). Ebizawa further discloses that when the state of a used battery unit is determined to be abnormal, the battery state recognition unit outputs information identifying the abnormal battery unit (Sect. 0111), thus teaches detecting a battery unit with reduced or degraded capacity within a battery storage system. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to configure the control device of the combined system of Akao and Ebizawa to control the overhead crane to remove a battery unit with a reduced capacity upon detection of the reduced capacity state by a battery state recognition unit (70) using a crane as it is already the mechanism used for the removal of stored battery units and removing faulty or diminished batteries would increase system efficiency by eliminating manual monitoring and intervention. Referring to claim 5. Akao in view of Ebizawa disclose the combination as set forth above as applied to above. Claim 5 requires a skid configured to be stacked to store a battery unit, comprising: a function of holding the battery unit, and a terminal configured to allow an electrical connection between the battery unit and an external conductor. Akao disclose a vehicular battery exchanging device comprising a rack-based storage system for batteries that can be stacked in multiple stages for high density storage and further discloses a bucket/carrier (7) that is formed in a substantially rectangular shape configured to accommodate a battery (3) inside, wherein the bucket can be stacked in multiple stages (See Sect. 0014), thus Akao teaches a carrier/bucket (7) configured to be stacked to store a battery unit, having a function of holding the battery unit, thus teaching a skid having a function of holding a battery unit and configured to be stacked to store a battery unit. However, Akao does not disclose a terminal configured to allow an electrical connection between the battery unit and an external conductor. Ebizawa a holder for a used battery unit that can be detachably attached to a storage device, the holder including a holder main body (10) that holds a used battery unit (910) and a connection portion (30) connected to the used battery unit held by the holder (See Sect. 0044-0045), wherein the connection portion specifically includes a battery-side connector (31) connected to the positive and negative electrode terminals of the used battery unit (910) and a connection circuit-side connector (330) connected to the connection circuit (930) of the storage device (90) (See Sect. 0049). It is understood that the connection circuit (930) of the storage device serves as an external conductor electrically connecting the holder held battery unit to the storage system (Sect. 0056). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Akao’s system to incorporate Ebizawa’s connection portion/terminal (30) in order to enable electrical access to the stored batter unit while it remains in the storage rack, without requiring separate manual wiring operations for each battery. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3, 7 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERRELL HOWARD MATTHEWS whose telephone number is (571)272-5929. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at (571)272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERRELL H MATTHEWS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669448
X-RAY INSPECTION APPARATUS
1y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12645270
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF THE ENERGY DISSIPATION OF PROCESSOR BASED SYSTEMS
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12630482
Apparatus, System and Method for Automated Food Waste Processing
3y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623252
SIEVE AND FRAME WITH IMPROVED CONNECTABILITY
1y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617620
LOAD CARRYING SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1053 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month