Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/862,212

Retention Apparatus for Retaining an Add-on Part to a Component for a Motor Vehicle and Arrangement

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Priority
May 02, 2022 — DE 10 2022 110 614.4 +1 more
Examiner
UPCHURCH, DAVID M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
762 granted / 1035 resolved
+13.6% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+17.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1053
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
55.2%
+15.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.1%
-30.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1035 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Loewe et al. (U.S. 8,997,316). As for Claim 11, Loewe discloses retention apparatus for retaining an add-on part on a structural element for a motor vehicle, comprising: a first securing region (12), via which the retention apparatus is configured to be retained on the structural element (32); a second securing region (30), via which the add-on part (35) is configured to be retained on the retention apparatus; and a sealing element (20) which is connected to the first securing region and which is formed for abutment against the structural element (abuts against 50), and by which sealing element the retention apparatus is sealable against the structural element. Re: Claim 12. (New) The retention apparatus according to claim 11, further comprising: a first retention member (14) which has the first securing region; and a second retention member (34) which is formed separately from the first retention member and which is connected thereto and which has the second securing region. Re: Claim 13. (New) The retention apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the first securing region has a retention element (26), by which the retention apparatus is connectable to the structural element in a positive-locking manner for retention on the structural element (see Figs. 11-12). Re: Claim 14. (New) The retention apparatus according to claim 13, wherein the retention element is received in a receiving element (52) of the structural element so as to form a bayonet closure in order to retain the retention apparatus on the structural element. Re: Claim 15. (New) The retention apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the second securing region has a catch element (protrusions of 34), by which the add-on part is to be retained on the retention apparatus so as to form a catch connection. Re: Claim 16. (New) The retention apparatus according to claim 11, further comprising: at least one support region (22) which is different from the first and second securing regions, and via which the add-on part is supportable on the retention apparatus. Re: Claim 17. (New) An arrangement, comprising: an add-on part (35); a structural element (32) for a motor vehicle, which structural element is formed separately from the add-on part; a retention apparatus by which the add-on part is retained on the structural element (see Fig. 7) , the retention apparatus having a first securing region (12), a second securing region (30) which adjoins the first securing region, and a sealing element (20), and wherein the retention apparatus is retained on the structural element via the first securing region (see Fig. 7), wherein the add-on part is retained on the retention apparatus via the second securing region (see Fig. 12), wherein the sealing element bears against the structural element (see Fig. 12), whereby the retention apparatus is sealed against the structural element (see Fig, 12), and wherein the retention apparatus is arranged at least mainly on an outwardly directed outer side of the structural element (see Fig. 12). Re: Claim 18. (New) The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein the add-on part (35) is arranged in a rear region of the motor vehicle (see Fig. 12). Re: Claim 19. (New) The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein the structural element (32) is a leaf element of the motor vehicle. Re: Claim 20. (New) The arrangement according to claim 17, wherein the add-on part is an air guiding element of the motor vehicle (see Fig. 7). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Lambrecht et al. U.S. 6,594,870 and Beyer et al. U.S. 11,767,872. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID M UPCHURCH whose telephone number is (571)270-7957. The examiner can normally be reached 6AM-3PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason San can be reached at (571)272-6531. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID M UPCHURCH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3677
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677914
RETRACTABLE ZIPPER WITH Y-SHAPED TAPE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669145
Hook Lock And Method
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667687
DIRECTIONAL LOCK FOR INTERFACE HEADGEAR ARRANGEMENT
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663036
FASTENER ASSEMBLY
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12660894
ZIP FASTENER
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+17.9%)
2y 1m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1035 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month