Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/862,239

ACTUATOR ASSEMBLY AND METHOD OF USE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 01, 2024
Examiner
COLLINS, DANIEL S.
Art Unit
3745
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Speo Products AS
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
506 granted / 596 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
630
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
40.7%
+0.7% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 596 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/1/24 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 35-37,39-43 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu, Chinese Patent Publication 111197602 A (hereinafter “Liu”) in view of Ragnar, British Patent Publication GB2608418 A (hereinafter “Ragnar’). In Reference to claim 35: Liu discloses an actuator system for use with a safety critical valve, the actuator system comprising: a high-pressure accumulator (14) comprising a second energy store and a second hydraulic fluid chamber; a pump (2); a directional control valve (7) configured to automatically move from a first position to a second position on loss of a control signal or electrical power (via biasing of spring); an actuator (10) comprising a first port (10-a) for receiving high-pressure hydraulic fluid to open the actuator and a second port (10-b) for receiving high-pressure hydraulic fluid to close the actuator; a first hydraulic fluid connection between the pump (2) and the second hydraulic fluid chamber (14), a second hydraulic fluid connection between the first hydraulic fluid chamber and the directional control valve (conduit between reservoir/tank and valve for discharge), a third hydraulic fluid connection between the second hydraulic fluid chamber (14) and the directional control valve (7: port a); a fourth hydraulic fluid connection between the directional control valve (7: port C) and the first port of the actuator (10) and a fifth hydraulic fluid connection between the directional control valve (7:port D) and the second port of the actuator (10); wherein in the first position the directional control valve (7: Pos. 1) provides fluid communication between the second hydraulic fluid chamber (14) and the first port (10-a) and fluid communication between the first hydraulic fluid (reservoir/tank) chamber and the second port (10-b) and in the second position the directional control valve (7: Pos. 2) provides fluid communication between the second hydraulic fluid chamber(14) and the second port (10-b) and fluid communication between the first hydraulic fluid chamber (tank/reservoir) and the first port (10-a); wherein the pump(2) is configured to provide pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first hydraulic fluid chamber (tank/reservoir) to the second hydraulic fluid chamber (14) to recharge the high-pressure accumulator (14) such that if the control signal or electrical power is lost to the directional control valve in use, the directional control valve (7) will automatically move to the first position and high-pressure hydraulic fluid will be provided from the second hydraulic fluid chamber (14) to the second port (10-a) to close the actuator (10). Liu fails to disclose a low pressure accumulator comprising a first energy store and a first hydraulic fluid chamber is provided, instead utilizing a comparative alternative of a traditional low pressure reservoir. However, in the same field of endeavor, Ragnar discloses a subsea system which instead of a low pressure reservoir utilizes a LP accumulator with a gas chamber to provide fluid to the pump for pressurization to an actuator. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing to modify Liu with the teachings of Ragnar, specifically by replacing the reservoir/tank of Liu with a low pressure accumulator that feeds the pump (as taught by Ragnar) because such a modification is a simple substitution of one known low pressure storage vessel for another providing the same predictable results of low pressure fluid to a tank. In Reference to Claim 36: Liu discloses an actuator system for use with a safety critical valve, the actuator system comprising: a high-pressure accumulator (14) comprising a second energy store and a second hydraulic fluid chamber; a pump(2); a directional control valve (7) configured to automatically move from a first position to a second position on loss of a control signal or electrical power (via spring biasing); an actuator (10) comprising a first port (10-a) for receiving high-pressure hydraulic fluid to close the actuator and a second port (10-b) for receiving high-pressure hydraulic fluid to open the actuator; a first hydraulic fluid connection between the pump (2) and the second hydraulic fluid chamber (14), a second hydraulic fluid connection between the first hydraulic fluid chamber (tank/reservoir) and the directional control valve (7) , a third hydraulic fluid connection between the second hydraulic fluid chamber (14) and the directional control valve (7) ; a fourth hydraulic fluid connection between the directional control valve (7) and the first port (10-a) of the actuator and a fifth hydraulic fluid connection between the directional control valve (7) and the second port (10-b) of the actuator; wherein in the first position (Pos. 1) the directional control valve (7) provides fluid communication between the second hydraulic fluid chamber and the first port and fluid communication between the first hydraulic fluid chamber and the second port and in the second position (Pos. 2) the directional control valve (7) provides fluid communication between the second hydraulic fluid chamber and the second port and fluid communication between the first hydraulic fluid chamber and the first port; wherein the pump (2) is configured to provide pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first hydraulic fluid chamber to the second hydraulic fluid chamber to recharge the high-pressure accumulator such that if the control signal or electrical power is lost to the directional control valve in use, the directional control valve will automatically move to the first position and high-pressure hydraulic fluid will be provided from the second hydraulic fluid chamber to the second port to open the actuator (See, Figure 3 Liu fails to disclose a low pressure accumulator comprising a first energy store and a first hydraulic fluid chamber is provided, instead utilizing a comparative alternative of a traditional low pressure reservoir. However, in the same field of endeavor, Ragnar discloses a subsea system which instead of a low pressure reservoir utilizes a LP accumulator with a gas chamber to provide fluid to the pump for pressurization to an actuator. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing to modify Liu with the teachings of Ragnar, specifically by replacing the reservoir/tank of Liu with a low pressure accumulator that feeds the pump (as taught by Ragnar) because such a modification is a simple substitution of one known low pressure storage vessel for another providing the same predictable results of low pressure fluid to a tank. In Reference to claim 37: Liu as modified further discloses wherein the system further comprises a sixth hydraulic fluid connection between the pump and the first hydraulic fluid chamber. See, Ragnar wherein the pump pressurized the fluid from the low pressure accumulator and therefore there must be a connection between the two. In Reference to Claim 39: Liu further discloses a safety critical valve (7) configured to be moveable between an open position and a closed position; wherein the actuator is configured with the safety critical valve such that when the actuator is in the open position the safety critical valve is in the open position and when the actuator is in the closed position the safety critical valve is in the closed position. See, Liu Figure 2 In Reference to claim 40: Liu as modified further discloses a method of configuring an actuator system such that the actuator system will provide fail-safe closing on loss of a control signal or electrical power, the method comprising the steps of: providing an actuator system according to claim 35; operating the pump (2) to pump pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first hydraulic fluid chamber (LP accumulator of Ragnar) to the second hydraulic fluid chamber to charge the high-pressure accumulator (14); and moving the actuator (10) to the open position. See, Liu. In Reference to claim 41: Liu as modified further discloses a method of configuring an actuator system such that the actuator system will provide fail-safe closing on loss of a control signal or electrical power, the method comprising the steps of: providing an actuator system according to claim 35; operating the pump (2) to pump pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first hydraulic fluid chamber (LP accumulator of Ragnar) to the second hydraulic fluid chamber to charge the high-pressure accumulator (14); and moving the actuator to the closed position. See, Liu. In Reference to Claim 42: Liu as modified further discloses a method of operating an actuator system to provide fail-safe closing on loss of a control signal or electrical power, the method comprising the steps of: providing an actuator system according to claim 35; operating the pump (2) to pump pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first hydraulic fluid chamber (as taught by Ragnar – LP accumulator) to the second hydraulic fluid chamber to charge the high-pressure accumulator (14); moving the actuator (10) to the open position; and stopping providing electrical power or a control signal to the directional control valve (7) such that the actuator moves to the closed position automatically (via the biasing force on the control valve. See, Liu Paragraph [0048-0051]; Specifically [0051] which disclose that the piston rod stretched out for emergency cut off when there is failure or no electricity. In Reference to Claim 43: Liu as modified further discloses a method of operating an actuator system to provide fail-safe opening on loss of a control signal or electrical power, the method comprising the steps of: providing an actuator system according to claim 36; operating the pump (2) to pump pressurized hydraulic fluid from the first hydraulic fluid chamber (as modified by Ragnar to a LP accumulator) to the second hydraulic fluid chamber to charge the high-pressure accumulator (14);moving the actuator to the closed position; and stopping providing electrical power or a control signal to the directional control valve such that the actuator moves to the open position automatically. Claim 38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu, Chinese Patent Publication 111197602 A (hereinafter “Liu”) in view of Ragnar, British Patent Publication GB2608418 A (hereinafter “Ragnar’) in further view of Groben et al., German Patent Publication DE 102011009276 A1 (hereinafter “Groben”) In Refrence to Claim 38: Liu as modifed discloses all the limitations as set forth in claim 37, but fails to disclose wherein the low pressure accumulator and the high pressure accumulator are provided within a double piston accumulator. However, in the same field of endeavor, subsea hydraulic components, Groben discloses a double piston accumulator wherein one chamber of the double piston accumulator (25) is for low pressure and the other chamber of the double piston accumulator is for high pressure (23). It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing to modify Liu such that the high pressure and low pressure accumulator are housed within the same accumulator on opposite sides of double piston because as discussed by Groben such a accumulator has better reliability in subsea environments than the gas accumulators. In addition, such a modification would provide the additional benefit of reducing the special requirement needed by having separate high and low pressure accumulators. Claims 44-47 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu, Chinese Patent Publication 111197602 A (hereinafter “Liu”) in view of Ragnar, British Patent Publication GB2608418 A (hereinafter “Ragnar’) in further view of Zhang et al., Chinese Patent Publication CN204828870U (hereinafter “Zhang”). In Reference to Claim 44-47: Liu as modified discloses all the limitations of claim 35, but fails to disclose providing a safety critical valve system, comprising: a safety critical valve configured to be moveable between an open position and a closed position; wherein the actuator is configured with the safety critical valve such that when the actuator is in the open position the safety critical valve is in the open position and when the actuator is in the closed position the safety critical valve is in the closed position. However, in the same field of endeavor, hydraulic circuits designed for power failure, Zhang discloses a hydraulic circuit wherein the actuator is responsible for opening and closing a respective safety gate valve. See, Figure 1 and Abstract. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of effective filing to further modify Liu such that the actuators of Liu are responsible for controlling a gate valve as taught by Zhang instead of the actuator providing the clamping function in Liu because such a modification is well known in the field of endeavor to use double sided hydraulic actuators to actuate a valve. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 48-53 allowed. Claims 48-53 disclose a kit assembly used to retrofit a pre-existing actuator system with a safety valve. Examiner could not find any prior art which discloses retrofitting as required by the last paragraph in each of the respective kit claims and Examiner does not believe it would be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify an actuator system in such a fashion. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL S. COLLINS whose telephone number is (313)446-6535. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 8:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at (571) 272-4648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL S COLLINS/Examiner, Art Unit 3745 /NATHANIEL E WIEHE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 01, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601150
SAFETY SYSTEM FOR MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577968
Soft Variable Impedance Actuator Using Embedded Jamming Layer
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570393
STABILITY AND CONTROL AUGMENTATION SYSTEM ACTUATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12559075
PRODUCTION-OPTIMIZED HOUSING FOR A HYDRAULIC UNIT FOR PRODUCING BRAKE PRESSURE FOR A HYDRAULIC BRAKE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12545224
RESERVOIR TANK FOR BRAKE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 596 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month