Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/862,845

METHODS AND APPARATUSES TO HANDLE PLMN LIST

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 04, 2024
Priority
May 05, 2022 — IN 202241026288 +2 more
Examiner
CAI, WAYNE HUU
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
730 granted / 917 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
953
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.9%
-35.1% vs TC avg
§103
58.8%
+18.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 917 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on November 4, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Drawings The drawings were received on acceptable. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-6 and 9-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Tiwari (US 2012/0077456) in view of Matolia et al. (hereinafter “Matolia”, US 2022/0232464). Regarding claim 1, Tiwari discloses a method for handling a Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) list in a satellite access network (500), comprises: storing, by a User Equipment (UE) (100) (i.e., mobile communication device 110 as shown in Fig. 1), a list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at a present UE location” (i.e., storing the Forbidden PLMN as described in paragraph 0025); and determining, by the UE (100), whether the UE (100) is successfully registered to an access apparatus (400) of a PLMN stored in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” via an access network (500) for an emergency service or a normal service (i.e., receiving the Attach Accept S205 and send the Attach Complete S207 as shown in Fig. 2, and as described in paragraph 0025); and performing, by the UE (100), one of not removing an entry from the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” stored at the UE (100) upon determining that the UE (100) is successfully registered for the emergency service to the PLMN stored in that the entry in the list of "PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location" via the access network (500) (i.e., the list of PLMNs equivalent when attached to the service network for emergency bearer services as described in paragraphs 0007-0008 and 0023), and removing the entry from the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” stored at the UE (100) upon determining that the UE (100) is successfully registered for the normal service to the PLMN stored in that entry in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” via the access network (500) (i.e., removing any PLMN that is present in the Forbidden PLMN list from the Equivalent PLMN list as described in paragraphs 0023 and 0026-0028). Tiwari, however, does not expressly disclose a satellite access apparatus. In a similar endeavor, Matolia discloses public land mobile network selection for non-terrestrial networks. Matolia also discloses the satellite access network (i.e., as shown in Fig. 5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to maximize service continuity and provide the best service conditions to the UE. Claim 9, Tiwari discloses a User Equipment (UE) (100) (i.e., mobile communication device 110 as shown in Fig. 1), comprising: a processor (110) (i.e., controller 112); a memory (130) (i.e., storage unit for storing the program codes of applications or communication protocols as described in paragraph 0024); and a PLMN list controller (150) (i.e., controller 112 controls the wireless module 111 for handling the Equivalent PLMN List as described in paragraph 0025), coupled with the processor (110) and the memory (130) (i.e., see descriptions in paragraph 0024), configured to: determine whether the UE (100) is successfully registered to an access apparatus (400) of the PLMN stored in a list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at a present UE location” via an access network (500) for an emergency service or a normal service (i.e., receiving the Attach Accept S205 and send the Attach Complete S207 as shown in Fig. 2, and as described in paragraph 0025); and perform one of not remove an entry from the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” stored at the UE (100) upon determining that the UE (100) is successfully registered for the emergency service to the PLMN stored in that entry in the list of "PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location" via the access network (500) (i.e., the list of PLMNs equivalent when attached to the service network for emergency bearer services as described in paragraphs 0007-0008 and 0023), and remove an entry from the list of “PLMNs not allowed to operate at the present UE location” at the UE (100) upon determining that the UE (100) is successfully registered for the normal service to the PLMN stored in that entry in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” via the access network (500) (i.e., removing any PLMN that is present in the Forbidden PLMN list from the Equivalent PLMN list as described in paragraphs 0023 and 0026-0028). Tiwari, however, does not expressly disclose a satellite access apparatus. In a similar endeavor, Matolia discloses public land mobile network selection for non-terrestrial networks. Matolia also discloses the satellite access network (i.e., as shown in Fig. 5). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skilled in the art to modify the teachings of the cited references and arrive at the present invention. The motivation/suggestion for doing so would have been to maximize service continuity and provide the best service conditions to the UE. Regarding claims 2 and 10, Tiwari and Matolia disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Tiwari also discloses wherein the satellite access network (500) is at least one of a satellite new generation radio access network (NG-RAN) access technology, a satellite Evolved Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) access technology, a Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) and a Radio Access Technology (RAT) (i.e., PLMN and RAT as described in paragraph 0024 and as shown in Fig. 1). Regarding claims 3 and 11, Tiwari and Matolia disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Matolia also discloses wherein the satellite access apparatus (400) is at least one of a Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) and a Mobility Management Entity (MME) (i.e., AMF as described in paragraph 0080). Regarding claims 4 and 12, Tiwari and Matolia disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Tiwari also discloses where in each entry in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” consists of: PLMN identity of the PLMN which sent a message including a Fifth Generation Mobility Management (5GMM) (i.e., each entry of the list contains a PLMN code for identifying a specific PLMN as described in paragraph 0006) or a Evolved Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) Terrestrial Radio Access Mobility Management (EMM) cause value #78 "PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location" via the satellite access network (500); geographical location, if known by the UE (100), where the 5GMM or the EMM cause value #78 is received over the satellite access network (500); and in case that a geographical location exists, a UE implementation specific distance value. Regarding claims 5 and 13, Tiwari and Matolia disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Matolia also discloses the satellite access network (i.e., as shown in Fig. 5). Tiwari also discloses wherein determining, by the UE (100), that the UE (100) is successfully registered to the PLMN stored in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” via the access network (500) for the emergency service comprises at least one of: registering or attaching, by the UE (100), successfully to the PLMN stored in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” via the access network (500) with at least one of a Fifth Generation System (5GS) Registration type value set to “emergency registration” (i.e., Attach Accept S305 as shown in Fig. 3 and as described in paragraph 0027) or a Evolved Packet Subsystem (EPS) Attach type value set to “EPS Emergency Attach” or a Fifth Generation System (5GS) Registration result information element value set to “Registered for emergency services” in an AS signaling message or a NAS signaling message or receiving an indication from the satellite access apparatus (400) in the satellite access network (500) that the UE (100) is successfully registered for the emergency service or an emergency bearer service. Regarding claims 6 and 14, Tiwari and Matolia disclose all limitations recited within claims as described above. Matolia also discloses the satellite access network (i.e., as shown in Fig. 5). Tiwari also discloses wherein determining, by the UE (100), that the UE (100) is successfully registered to the PLMN stored in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” via the access network (500) for the normal services comprises at least one of: registering or attaching, by the UE (100), successfully to the PLMN stored in the list of “PLMN not allowed to operate at the present UE location” via the access network (500) with at least one of a Fifth Generation System (5GS) Registration type value not set to “emergency registration” (i.e., the PLMN to which the service network 120 belongs is removed from the Equivalent PLMN List and the Equivalent PLMN list comprises the PLMN to which the service network 130 belongs, and the UE registers with the service network 130 for normal services by transmitting an Attach Request as described in paragraph 0026) or a Evolved Packet Subsystem (EPS) Attach type value not set to “EPS Emergency Attach” or a Fifth Generation System (5GS) Registration result information element value not set to “Registered for emergency services” in an AS signaling message or a NAS signaling message or receiving an indication from the satellite access apparatus (400) in the satellite access network (500) that the UE (100) is successfully registered for the normal service or not for an emergency bearer service or not for the emergency service. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-8 and 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WAYNE CAI whose telephone number is (571)272-7798. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 7:00 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KATHY WANG-HURST can be reached on (571)270-5371. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Wayne H Cai/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 04, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12764606
MANAGING RESOURCES IN A RADIO ACCESS NETWORK
3y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12764645
METHOD FOR NETWORK SLICE-BASED CELL DETERMINATION AND RELATED PRODUCTS
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12756998
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM SUPPORTING VEHICLE COMMUNICATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12712685
METHOD AND RADIO ACCESS NETWORK NODE FOR ALLOCATING RESOURCES FOR AN APERIODIC SOUNDING REFERENCE SIGNAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12695580
PREEMPTION FOR LOW LATENCY APPLICATION BY USING NULL TONES OR DEDICATED RESOURCE UNIT (RU) FOR SUSPEND REQUEST FEEDBACK
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+15.5%)
3y 0m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 917 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month