Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/863,453

TERMINAL, RADIO COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND BASE STATION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 06, 2024
Priority
May 17, 2022 — JP 2022-081200 +1 more
Examiner
VUONG, QUOCHIEN B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
768 granted / 855 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -0% lift
Without
With
+-0.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
869
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§102
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 855 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/06/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 6 and 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Jeon et al. (US 2021/0377876 A1). Regarding claim 6, Jeon et al. (figure 1) disclose a terminal (wireless device) comprising: a processor that, when uplink (UL) simultaneous transmission using multiple panels is supported (paragraph [0355], “A UL transmission of a wireless device may be scheduled antenna group 1 and antenna group 2 simultaneously. For a multi-antenna groups (panels) …”), applies reporting of power headroom (PH) per panel; and a transmitter that transmits a medium access control control element (MAC CE) including the PH per panel corresponding to one cell (paragraphs [0363], [0366] and [0374]). Regarding claim 9, Jeon et al. (figure 1) disclose a radio communication method for a terminal (wireless device), comprising: when uplink (UL) simultaneous transmission using multiple panels is supported (paragraph [0355], “A UL transmission of a wireless device may be scheduled antenna group 1 and antenna group 2 simultaneously. For a multi-antenna groups (panels) …”), applying reporting of power headroom (PH) per panel; and transmitting a medium access control control element (MAC CE) including the PH per panel corresponding to one cell (paragraphs [0363], [0366] and [0374]). Regarding claim 10, Jeon et al. (figure 1) disclose a base station comprising: a processor that, when uplink (UL) simultaneous transmission using multiple panels is supported in a terminal (wireless device) (paragraph [0355], “A UL transmission of a wireless device may be scheduled antenna group 1 and antenna group 2 simultaneously. For a multi-antenna groups (panels) …”), configures reporting of power headroom (PH) per panel for the terminal; and a receiver that receives a medium access control control element (MAC CE) including the PH per panel corresponding to one cell (paragraphs [0363], [0366] and [0374]). Regarding claim 11, Jeon et al. (figure 1) disclose a system comprising a terminal (wireless device) and a base station, wherein the terminal comprises: a processor that, when uplink (UL) simultaneous transmission using multiple panels is supported (paragraph [0355], “A UL transmission of a wireless device may be scheduled antenna group 1 and antenna group 2 simultaneously. For a multi-antenna groups (panels) …”), applies reporting of power headroom (PH) per panel; and a transmitter that transmits a medium access control control element (MAC CE) including the PH per panel corresponding to one cell, and the base station comprises: a processor that configures the reporting of the PH per panel for the terminal; and a receiver that receives the MAC CE (paragraphs [0363], [0366] and [0374]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 7 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeon et al. in view of Park et al. (US 2022/0322245 A1). Regarding claim 7, Jeon et al. disclose the terminal according to claim 6 above. In addition, Jeon et al. disclose wherein the MAC CE includes a field indicating whether the PH per panel is based on a real transmission or follows a reference format, a field indicating maximum power per panel (paragraph [0366]). Jeon et al. do not explicitly disclose wherein the MAC CE includes a field related to maximum permitted exposure (MPE) per panel. However, Park et al. disclose MAC CE includes a field related to maximum permitted exposure (MPE) per panel (paragraphs [0648] and [0658]). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to adapt the MPE per panel of Park et al. to the MAC CE of Jeon et al. for safeguarding user health. Regarding claim 8, Jeon et al. disclose the terminal according to claim 6 above. Jeon et al. do not explicitly disclose wherein the PH per panel is associated with a respective different transmission configuration indication (TCI) state. However, Park et al. disclose the PH per panel is associated with a respective different transmission configuration indication (TCI) state (paragraph [0172]-[0173] and [0185]-[0190]). Therefore, it would have been obvious for one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to adapt the TCI state of Park et al. to the MAC CE of Jeon et al. for more dynamic resource management and scheduling. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Xu et al. (US 2022/0124642 A1) disclose a wireless device receives configuration parameters indicating a maximum permissible exposure (MPE) threshold. First uplink signals are transmitted via a first antenna panel; a downlink control information (DCI) indicating switching from the first antenna panel to a second antenna panel is received; an MPE event is detected based on the MPE threshold and a power value associated with the second antenna panel. Based on the detecting the MPE event: the switching indication is ignored by not switching to the second antenna panel; and second uplink signals are transmitted via the first antenna panel. Go et al. (US 2023/0379843 A1) teach a method of a user equipment (UE) to report a power headroom (PH) in a wireless communication system includes receiving configuration information related to the power headroom (PH), and transmitting a message for a report of the PH; the report of the PH is triggered based on a pre-configured event, and the message for the report of the PH includes information related to P-MPR (Power management - Maximum Power Reduction); the information related to the P-MPR includes one or more values related to the PH, and the one or more values related to the PH are related to one or more specific indexes. Zhou et al. (US 11,689,235 B2) disclose wireless communications use one or more devices for transmission and/or reception that may lead to potentially harmful exposure; one or more safety measures may be used for wireless communication devices, such as maximum power exposure (MPE) reporting. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to QUOCHIEN B VUONG whose telephone number is (571)272-7902. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00-06:00PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANTHONY ADDY can be reached at 571-272-7795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /QUOCHIEN B VUONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2645
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 06, 2024
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701577
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR TRIGGERING ADAPTATION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701388
ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PROVIDING DIGITAL CONTENT BASED ON SHORT RANGE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND OPERATION METHOD OF THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695473
RADIO TRANSMITTER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695524
METHOD FOR DETERMINING QUANTITY OF PASSIVE INTERMODULATION SOURCE AND RELATED DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695424
Local-Oscillator Filtering in a Mixer
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (-0.1%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 855 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month