Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/863,773

FORESTRY TRAILER, IN PARTICULAR FOR TRANSPORTING OF TIMBERS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Examiner
SLITERIS, JOSELYNN Y
Art Unit
3614
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Tajfun Planina Proizvodnja Strojev D O O
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
272 granted / 353 resolved
+25.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
372
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
33.5%
-6.5% vs TC avg
§102
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 353 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgement Examiner acknowledges receipt of Applicant’s Preliminary Amendment to the Claims, Specification, and Abstract (filed 11/7/2024). Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the limitations “a towing vehicle” recited in claim 1 line 9; “the vertical beams extending up from the ground” recited in claim 1 lines 17-18; “a crane” recited in claim 1 line 21; “each of the loading bridges comprising a uniform longitudinal section of a square tube of a predetermined length which is rotated at 45º around its longitudinal geometric axis and oriented such that a first diagonal of a transverse cross-section of the loading bridge extends parallel to the ground, while a second diagonal extends perpendicular to the ground” recited in claim 1 lines 27-32; “a crane” recited in claim 8 line 2; and “the telescopic supporting leg comprising a fifth V-shaped groove, which is adapted to be placed on the first side of said square tube of the bearing assembly and a third fastener comprising a sixth V-shaped groove and adapted to be placed on the second side of said bearing assembly” recited in claim 10 lines 5-9 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings are objected to because “Fig. 7” should be changed to --Fig. 8--; and “Fig. 8” should be changed to --Fig. 7-- (see “Brief Description of the Drawings” in the Specification). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claims 2-10 are objected to because of the following informalities: in claims 2-10, “The trailer” should be changed to --The forestry trailer--; in claim 4 line 3, “the at least one loading bridge” should be changed to --one of the at least two loading bridges--; in claim 5 line 2, “each of the at least one loading bridge” should be changed to --one of the at least two loading bridges--. in claim 6 lines 13-14, “the said positioning spacers” should be changed to -- said positioning spacers--; in claim 8 line 2, “a crane” should be changed to --the crane--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are replete with indefinite language failing to positively set forth structure and its interconnection. Please note, here are a few examples: In claim 1 lines 27-32, the limitation “each of the loading bridges comprising a uniform longitudinal section of a square tube of a predetermined length which is rotated at 45º around its longitudinal geometric axis and oriented such that a first diagonal of a transverse cross-section of the loading bridge extends parallel to the ground, while a second diagonal extends perpendicular to the ground” is unclear. Therefore, claim 1 is rendered indefinite. In claim 1 line 29, the use of “its” is improper. In claim 1 line 49, it is unclear to which loading bridge is being referred in the limitation “the loading bridge”. Therefore, claim 1 is rendered indefinite. Examiner suggests changing said limitation to --each loading bridge--. In claim 1 line 50, it is unclear to which loading bridge is being referred in the limitation “the loading bridge”. Therefore, claim 1 is rendered indefinite. Examiner suggests changing said limitation to --each loading bridge--. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the area" in line 51. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Examiner suggests changing said limitation to --an area--. In claim 7 line 3 (two occurrences), the use of “it” is improper. ETC; ETC. Appropriate correction is required, and the claims should be reviewed in their entirety for compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSELYNN Y SLITERIS whose telephone number is (571)272-6675. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am - 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jason D. Shanske can be reached at 571-270-5985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSELYNN Y SLITERIS/Examiner, Art Unit 3614 /JASON D SHANSKE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3614
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600312
SEAT-MOUNTED AIRBAG DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589710
VEHICLE AIRBAG DEVICE AND PASSENGER PROTECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583412
AIR BAG DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12534042
AIRBAG APPARATUS FOR VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12528437
KNEE AIR BAG
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+20.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 353 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month