Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/863,814

DEVICE FOR DISPENSING ACTIVE INGREDIENTS OR CONVEYABLE SUBSTANCES IN A TARGETED, CONTROLLABLE, AND REGULATABLE MANNER USING A GAS GENERATING CELL

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Priority
May 23, 2022 — EU 22174862.7 +3 more
Examiner
PRICE, NATHAN R
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Simatec AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
278 granted / 521 resolved
-16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+38.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
567
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
41.5%
+1.5% vs TC avg
§102
27.8%
-12.2% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 521 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment This office action is responsive to the preliminary amendment filed on 11/7/24. As directed by the amendment: no claims have been amended, claims 1-4 have been cancelled, and new claims 5-10 have been added. Thus, claims 5-10 are presently pending in this application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 8, “the protective agents” lacks antecedent basis. Note that claim 8 depends from claim 5 and “protective agents” is originally recited in claim 7. For the purposes of examination the claim will be interpreted in light of claim 7. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 5-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Maget (US 6413238). Regarding claim 5, Maget discloses an apparatus (apparatus illustrated in fig. 1) for conveying a conveyable medium 4 (see fig. 1), the apparatus comprising: a gas generating cell 24 configured for generating gas for displacing the conveyable medium (col. 4, ln. 63 – col. 5, ln. 4); a containment configured for the conveyable medium in gaseous, liquid, viscous, pasty, or pulverulent form (syringe barrel 30, see fig. 1); and the apparatus being configured for dispensing the conveyable medium into an organism, being a human, an animal or a plant, or onto a technical system in a targeted, controlled, regulated and monitored manner (system of fig. 1 fully capable of delivering to any claimed target; see also col. 4, ln. 49-52). Regarding claim 6, Maget discloses the technical system is a machine or a technical installation (as noted regarding claim 5 above, the apparatus of Maget is fully capable of delivering to a technical system, including in the form of a machine or technical installation). Regarding claim 7, Maget discloses the conveyable medium is any one of a plurality of media selected from the group consisting of medicaments or active ingredients in liquid, dissolved or viscous form, any type of supporting substance and liquid to be conveyed by the system, and lubricants or protective agents or reagents for use in the technical system (col. 7, ln. 46: medication). Regarding claim 8, Maget discloses the protective agents are grease or oil (the apparatus of Maget is fully capable of use with these conveyable mediums). Regarding claim 9, Maget discloses an operating, control, regulating, monitoring and communication unit (illustrated in fig. 2), a gas drive unit (movable partition 14, driven by the gas), an active ingredient reservoir 6, and a connection system 10. Regarding claim 10, Maget discloses the operating, control, regulating, monitoring and communication unit is configured for carrying out one or more of the following: a) a start function for an optimum ramp-up of a conveying flow; b) an indirect regulation of the dispensing quantity by means of temperature, pressure, and current measurement over time, and c) a bolus function for reacting to higher dosages required for a short time (at least “b)” is disclosed in col. 3, ln. 33-49). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Li et al. (US 20140094770) – gas cell-driven piston with electronic controls Maget (US 4886514) – gas drives a diaphragm instead of a plunger Gfeller et al. (US 20220081791) – electrochemical gas production cell, describing intended use as a pressure source for driving lubricants (par. 0002) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHAN R PRICE whose telephone number is (571)270-5421. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00am-4:00pm Eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Tsai can be reached at 571-270-5246. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHAN R PRICE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766266
DOSAGE ADJUSTER FOR SYRINGE
4y 4m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758740
APPARATUS FOR RETAINING AND SEALING SEPTUM IN INSERTION MECHANISM FOR FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE
4y 4m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12697422
A BREAST PUMP
3y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691007
USER SELECTED CONFIDENCE LEVEL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF AN IMMINENT VACUUM SURGE DURING PHACOEMULSIFICATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12673069
INTRA-ARTICULAR NEEDLE PLACEMENT DEVICE AND METHOD OF USING
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+38.7%)
4y 0m (~2y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 521 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month