Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/864,358

TRANSPORT DEVICE AND USE OF SAME FOR TRANSPORTING AT LEAST ONE STERILE-PRODUCT CONTAINER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
May 10, 2022 — DE 10 2022 111 697.2 +1 more
Examiner
AYRES, TIMOTHY MICHAEL
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Aesculap AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
583 granted / 990 resolved
+6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1027
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
79.5%
+39.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 990 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status This is a first office action on the merits of application SN 18/864,358 and filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the drive of claim 11, 12, 18, and 21; the actuator of claim 21; the bracing element of claims 13-17, 22, and 23 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 12-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 12-17 recite that the linear guide and drive mechanism are built into the door, but the specification and drawings do not show enough details for one of ordinary skill in the art to replicate this construction. Based on thickness of the door shown in figure 18 and lack of hinge structure shown, It is unclear how the door and lifting mechanism would not collapse once the weight of a bin is placed on the lift. Claims 18-23 recite that the linear guide and drive mechanism is in the frame around the opening, but the specification and drawings do not show enough detail for one of ordinary skill in the art to replicate this construction. It is unclear based on the folding of the door how the cantilevered system would not collapse once the weight of a bin is placed on the lift. Claims 13, 15, 17, 22, and 23 recite a bracing element connected between the door and the trolley, but the specification and drawings to not show a bracing element and the specification does not provide enough detail for one of ordinary skill in the art replicate the construction being claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by German Patent DE 10 2016 121 749 to Antrag. Antrag teaches 11. A transport device for transporting at least one sterile-product container, the transport device comprising: a receiving space (figure 1 and 3) configured in a transport trolley; a lifting support (2); a linear guide (figure 5a and 5b); and a drive (15), the receiving space comprising support elements (16) on a first plane (figure 3) and on a second plane (figure 3) parallel to the first plane, the support elements configured such that a sterile-product container receptacle is supportable on the support elements, the lifting support being arrangeable in a first position on the support elements of the first plane in such a way that the sterile-product container receptacle is displaceable back and forth between the support elements of the first plane and the lifting support, the lifting support also being arrangeable in a second position on the support elements of the second plane in such a way that the sterile-product container receptacle is displaceable back and forth between the support elements of the second plane and the lifting support, the linear guide extending transversely to the first plane and the second plane, such that lifting support is guidable from the first position to the second position by the linear guide, the lifting support being movable along the linear guide from the first position to the second position by the drive, and the linear guide, the drive, and the lifting support being configured on the transport trolley (as best seen in figures 1-3). Claim(s) 11-15, 18, and 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent 9,795,276 to Park. Park teaches 11. A transport device for transporting at least one sterile-product container, the transport device comprising: a receiving space (12) configured in a transport trolley (the cabinet is capable of having wheels added for transport); a lifting support (110); a linear guide (100a); and a drive (140), the receiving space comprising support elements (13a, 13b) on a first plane (figure 1) and on a second plane (figure 1) parallel to the first plane, the support elements configured such that a sterile-product container receptacle is supportable on the support elements, the lifting support being arrangeable in a first position (figure 2) on the support elements of the first plane in such a way that the sterile-product container receptacle is displaceable back and forth between the support elements of the first plane and the lifting support, the lifting support also being arrangeable in a second position (figure 3) on the support elements of the second plane in such a way that the sterile-product container receptacle is displaceable back and forth between the support elements of the second plane and the lifting support, the linear guide extending transversely to the first plane and the second plane, such that lifting support is guidable from the first position to the second position by the linear guide, the lifting support being movable along the linear guide from the first position to the second position by the drive, and the linear guide, the drive, and the lifting support being configured on the transport trolley. 12. wherein: the transport trolley has a frame (figure 2) surrounding an opening through which the at least one sterile-product container is moveable into or out of the receiving space, the transport trolley has a door (11) pivotably mounted on an outer front side of the frame, and the linear guide, the drive, and the lifting support are configured on an inner side of the door in such a way that the lifting support is alignable parallel to the support elements in an open position of the door (as best seen in figures 2-5). 13. further comprising at least one bracing element (hinge structure) movable on the door that is moveable relative to the door, wherein the at least one bracing element is movable into a bracing position in which the at least one bracing element supports the door in the open position relative to a flat base on which the transport trolley is supported (the door inherently has a hinge/bracing structure that maintains the door in the flat level position with the weight of the rack as seen in figure 2). 14. wherein the lifting support is pivotably connected to the linear guide in such a way that the lifting support is foldable from a folded-out position, in which the lifting support is aligned parallel to the support elements of the receiving space in the open position of the door, into a folded-in position, in which the lifting support is aligned parallel to the door (the lifting support is parallel with the door in all positions). 15. further comprising at least one bracing element movable on the door that is moveable relative to the door, wherein the at least one bracing element is movable into a bracing position in which the at least one bracing element supports the door in the open position relative to a flat base on which the transport trolley is supported (the door inherently has a hinge/bracing structure that maintains the door in the flat level position with the weight of the rack as seen in figure 2). 18. wherein: the transport trolley has a frame (figure 2) surrounding an opening through which the at least one sterile-product container is movable into or out of the receiving space, and the linear guide, the drive, and the lifting support are configured on an outer front side of the frame (the door is attached to the front frame opening and is therefore on an outer front side) 19. wherein: the lifting support is configured as a door (11) which is pivotably and displaceably connected to the linear guide in such a way that the door at least largely covers the opening in a covering orientation (figure 1), and the door is aligned parallel to the support elements of the receiving space in a lifting orientation (figure 2) aligned transversely to the covering orientation. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIMOTHY MICHAEL AYRES whose telephone number is (571)272-8299. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 11:30-8. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dan Troy can be reached at (571) 270-3742. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIMOTHY M AYRES/Examiner, Art Unit 3637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12672714
EXTENSION TABLE
4y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12653302
STANDING DESK WITH MODULAR BASE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649402
RETRACTABLE TABLE FOR VEHICLE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12630331
Removable Metal Pallet Kit
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628949
STRUCTURE FOR ASSEMBLY TYPE FURNITURE
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+21.3%)
2y 8m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 990 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month