Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/864,360

BASE, HOLDING MECHANISM, CROTCH BELT BUCKLE RECEIVING DEVICE, AND CHILD SAFETY SEAT

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 08, 2024
Priority
May 09, 2022 — CN 202210500423.4 +3 more
Examiner
KELLEHER, WILLIAM J
Art Unit
3648
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
199 granted / 414 resolved
-3.9% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
2 currently pending
Career history
423
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
85.8%
+45.8% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 414 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 20 uses the phrase “tends to” which is being interpreted as “likely to act in a certain way,” rendering the scope of the claim indefinite. The Examiner recommends changing this language to either “a reset element which engages the locking pin” or “a reset element capable of engaging the locking pin” or similar. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(a) as being anticipated by Xu (CN 204978315 U). Regarding Claim 1, Xu (most notably in Figure 5) discloses a base for a child safety seat, wherein the base comprises: a housing; a base bracket (24) received in the housing; and an anchor assembly (20, 23, 25) telescopically and pivotably connected to the base bracket, and at least partially extends out of the housing. Regarding Claim 2, Xu discloses the base according to claim 1, wherein the anchor assembly comprises a pivot shaft (25), and the base bracket is provided with a first sliding groove (241), wherein the pivot shaft is slidably arranged in the first sliding groove to form a pivot point. Regarding Claim 3, Xu discloses the base according to claim 2, wherein the anchor assembly further comprises a connecting part (isofix shown at the left and right sides of 20), wherein the connecting part is capable of being anchored to a fixing rod of a seat of a vehicle to form an anchoring point. Regarding Claim 4, Xu discloses the base according to claim 3, wherein the anchor assembly further comprises a sliding part (23), wherein the pivot shaft is located at an end of the sliding part, and the connecting part is fixedly connected to the other end of the sliding part, so that a distance is formed between the pivot point and the anchoring point. Regarding Claim 5, Xu discloses the base according to claim 4, wherein the sliding part comprises a reinforcement element (protrusions that jut up from 21 with holes for springs) fixedly connected to the sliding part. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to William J Kelleher whose telephone number is (571)272-7753. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday: 7am-3:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Kelleher can be reached at 571-272-7753. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. William J. Kelleher Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 3648-B /William Kelleher/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 08, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12611041
ADJUSTABLE HEADBOARD DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12461221
Multi-Signal Radar Cross-Talk Mitigation
2y 10m to grant Granted Nov 04, 2025
Patent 12415607
FORCE ABSORBING SHOULDER BELT ASSEMBLIES ESPECIALLY USEFUL FOR AIRCRAFT OCCUPANT SEATS
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 16, 2025
Patent 9683645
DIFFERENTIAL OF LIGHTWEIGHT CONSTRUCTION FOR MOTOR VEHICLES
7y 6m to grant Granted Jun 20, 2017
Patent 9663003
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ADJUSTMENT FITTING
6y 5m to grant Granted May 30, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+27.8%)
2y 10m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 414 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month