Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/864,592

IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION RECEIVING DEVICE, POWER STORAGE PACK, AND IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION RECEIVING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 11, 2024
Priority
May 19, 2022 — JP 2022-082179 +1 more
Examiner
MCANDREW, CHRISTOPHER P
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
837 granted / 975 resolved
+25.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
994
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
86.4%
+46.4% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 975 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-2 & 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kitagawa (U.S. PGPub # 2009/0039833) in view of Ittogi et al (U.S. PGPub # 2021/0258195.). Regarding Independent claim 1, Kitagawa teaches: An identification information receiving device (Fig. 1 Element 3. See Abstract.) connected to an identification information transmitting device (Fig. 1 Element 1. See Abstract.) by a power line (Fig. 1 Elements 1 & 3. See Abstract and paragraph 0052.), the identification information receiving device comprising: a measurement value obtainment unit (Fig. 1 Elements 7, 8, & 9. See Abstract and paragraphs 0043-0045. Fig. 3 Elements 7, 8, & 9. See paragraphs 0058-0062.) that obtains measurement values of an electric current (Fig. 1 Elements 8 & 9. Fig. 3 Elements 8 & 9.) or a voltage (Fig. 1 Elements 8 & 9. Fig. 3 Elements 8 & 9.) of the power line; an identification information reading unit (Fig. 1 Element 3, the Control means. See paragraph 0044. Fig. 3 Element 3. See paragraph 0060.) that reads identification information as binary data (Fig. 1 Element 34, the Control means. See paragraphs 0056-0057, 0059, 0065, 0067, & 0076 wherein digital data and signals are disclosed. Digital data is binary. ) by determining whether a measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information among the measurement values is greater or less than a determination threshold value other than 0 (Paragraph 0054 wherein “the control means 3 of the battery pack 1 monitors a charge state and a discharge state, when information indicating an over-charge state or the occurrence of an abnormal phenomenon is transmitted from the battery pack to the charging device.”), the identification information being defined by a plurality of bits and superimposed on the electric current or the voltage in the power line by the identification information transmitting device (Fig. 1 Element 3, the Control means. See paragraphs 0048-0049 & 0059-0061.); and PNG media_image1.png 494 670 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 398 752 media_image2.png Greyscale Kitagawa does not explicitly teach: a threshold value setting unit that compares a latest determination threshold value to the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line by the identification information transmitting device, calculates two representative values that are (i) a representative value of one or more measurement values each greater than or equal to the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information and (ii) a representative value of one or more measurement values each less than the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information, and sets the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value. Ittogi teaches: a threshold value setting unit (Fig. 1 Element 103. Paragraphs 0026-0028.) that compares a latest determination threshold value to the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information (Fig. 1 Element 109. See paragraphs 0026-0030 and 0038. See adjustment data.) superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line by the identification information transmitting device (Fig. 1 Element 101, the data carrier apparatus. See paragraphs 0019-0030 and elsewhere.), calculates two representative values (Fig. 1 Element 103. Paragraphs 0026-0028.) that are (i) a representative value of one or more measurement values each greater than or equal to the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information (Paragraph 0037 wherein the “average voltage” Acd is calculated.) and (ii) a representative value of one or more measurement values each less than the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information, and sets the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value (Paragraph 0038 wherein the “adjustment data is disclosed.). PNG media_image3.png 522 790 media_image3.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to apply the teachings of Ittogi to the teachings of Kitagawa such that a threshold value setting unit that compares a latest determination threshold value to the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line by the identification information transmitting device, calculates two representative values that are (i) a representative value of one or more measurement values each greater than or equal to the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information and (ii) a representative value of one or more measurement values each less than the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information, and sets the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value because both Kitagawa & Ittogi “pertain to the technical field of data communication using a voltage or a current.” “Therefore, a person skilled in the art could easily have conceived of determining whether a measurement value of a current or a voltage corresponding to each of the bits of data is greater or smaller than a determination threshold excluding 0, instead of using PWM as a method for modulating the identification information, to read the data as binary data in the identification information receiving device of the invention disclosed in Kitagawa and configuring the invention in Kitagawa to compare the measurement values corresponding to the respective bits of the multi-bit identification information transmitted by the identification information transmission device as a current or a voltage of the transmission line with a determination threshold, calculate a representative value of the measurement values equal to or higher than the determination threshold and a representative value of the measurement values less than the determination threshold, and set an intermediate value of the two representative values as an updated determination threshold on the basis of the matters disclosed in Ittogi.” See written opinion of international search authority. Furthermore, these references would combine because these both allow one to make determinations in data communications using various techniques that are functionally equivalent, reliable and dependable. Regarding claim 2, Kitagawa & Ittogi teach all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Kitagawa teaches the identification information reading unit (Fig. 1 Element 3, the Control means. See paragraph 0044. Fig. 3 Element 3. See paragraph 0060.) reads the identification information as the binary data (Fig. 1 Element 3, the Control means. See paragraph 0044. Fig. 3 Element 3. See paragraph 0060.) by determining whether the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information is greater or less than the updated determination threshold value (Paragraph 0037.). Regarding claim 5, Kitagawa & Ittogi teach all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Kitagawa does not explicitly teach a determination threshold value record holding unit that holds a record of the updated determination threshold value, wherein the threshold value setting unit sets an initial value of the determination threshold value based on at least one determination threshold value held in the determination threshold value record holding unit. Ittogi teaches a determination threshold value record holding unit that holds a record of the updated determination threshold value (Paragraphs 0004, 0022-0023, 0027-0028, 0036-0037, & elsewhere.), wherein the threshold value setting unit sets an initial value of the determination threshold value based on at least one determination threshold value held in the determination threshold value record holding unit (Paragraphs 0004, 0022-0023, 0027-0028, 0036-0037, & elsewhere.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to apply the teachings of Ittogi to the teachings of Kitagawa such that a determination threshold value record holding unit that holds a record of the updated determination threshold value, wherein the threshold value setting unit sets an initial value of the determination threshold value based on at least one determination threshold value held in the determination threshold value record holding unit because storing information is common and well-known. Regarding claim 6, Kitagawa & Ittogi teach all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Kitagawa teaches an energy storage pack that is detachable and portable and serves as the identification information receiving device according to claim 1 (Fig. 1 Element 1. Fig. 3 Element 50. See associated text in paragraphs 0026-0030.) Regarding Independent claim 7, Kitagawa teaches: An identification information receiving method comprising: obtaining measurement values of an electric current (Fig. 1 Elements 8 & 9. Fig. 3 Elements 8 & 9.) or a voltage (Fig. 1 Elements 8 & 9. Fig. 3 Elements 8 & 9.) of a power line connecting an identification information transmitting device (Fig. 1 Elements 7, 8, & 9. See Abstract and paragraphs 0043-0045. Fig. 3 Elements 7, 8, & 9. See paragraphs 0058-0062.) and an identification information receiving device (Fig. 1 Elements 7, 8, & 9. See Abstract and paragraphs 0043-0045. Fig. 3 Elements 7, 8, & 9. See paragraphs 0058-0062.); reading identification information (Fig. 1 Element 3, the Control means. See paragraph 0044. Fig. 3 Element 3. See paragraph 0060.) as binary data (Fig. 1 Element 34, the Control means. See paragraph 0059. ) by determining whether a measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information among the measurement values is greater or less than a determination threshold value other than 0 (Paragraph 0054 wherein “the control means 3 of the battery pack 1 monitors a charge state and a discharge state, when information indicating an over-charge state or the occurrence of an abnormal phenomenon is transmitted from the battery pack to the charging device.”), the identification information being defined by a plurality of bits and superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line by the identification information transmitting device (Fig. 1 Element 3, the Control means. See paragraph 0044. Fig. 3 Element 3. See paragraph 0060.); PNG media_image1.png 494 670 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 398 752 media_image2.png Greyscale Kitagawa does not explicitly teach: comparing a latest determination threshold value to the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line by the identification information transmitting device; calculating two representative values that are (i) a representative value of one or more measurement values each greater than or equal to the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information and (ii) a representative value of one or more measurement values each less than the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information; and setting the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value. Ittogi teaches: comparing a latest determination threshold value (Fig. 1 Element 103. Paragraphs 0026-0028.) to the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information (Fig. 1 Element 109. See paragraphs 0026-0030 and 0038. See adjustment data.) superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line by the identification information transmitting device (Fig. 1 Element 101, the data carrier apparatus. See paragraphs 0019-0030 and elsewhere.); calculating two representative values (Fig. 1 Element 103. Paragraphs 0026-0028.) that are (i) a representative value of one or more measurement values each greater than or equal to the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information (Paragraph 0037 wherein the “average voltage” Acd is calculated.) and (ii) a representative value of one or more measurement values each less than the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information (Paragraph 0038 wherein the “adjustment data is disclosed.); and setting the determination threshold value (Fig. 1 Element 103. Paragraphs 0026-0028.) to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value (Fig. 1 Element 103. Paragraphs 0026-0028.). PNG media_image4.png 644 975 media_image4.png Greyscale It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to apply the teachings of Ittogi to the teachings of Kitagawa such that a threshold value setting unit that compares a latest determination threshold value to the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line by the identification information transmitting device; calculates two representative values that are (i) a representative value of one or more measurement values each greater than or equal to the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information and (ii) a representative value of one or more measurement values each less than the determination threshold value among the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the identification information; and sets the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value because both Kitagawa & Ittogi “pertain to the technical field of data communication using a voltage or a current.” “Therefore, a person skilled in the art could easily have conceived of determining whether a measurement value of a current or a voltage corresponding to each of the bits of data is greater or smaller than a determination threshold excluding 0, instead of using PWM as a method for modulating the identification information, to read the data as binary data in the identification information receiving device of the invention disclosed in Kitagawa and configuring the invention in Kitagawa to compare the measurement values corresponding to the respective bits of the multi-bit identification information transmitted by the identification information transmission device as a current or a voltage of the transmission line with a determination threshold, calculate a representative value of the measurement values equal to or higher than the determination threshold and a representative value of the measurement values less than the determination threshold, and set an intermediate value of the two representative values as an updated determination threshold on the basis of the matters disclosed in Ittogi.” See written opinion of international search authority. Furthermore, these references would combine because these both allow one to make determinations in data communications using various techniques that are functionally equivalent, reliable and dependable. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 & 4 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: the prior art listed does not anticipate alone or combine in an obvious manner to teach the invention claimed by applicant. Regarding claim 3, Kitagawa & Ittogi teach all elements of claim 1, upon which this claim depends. Kitagawa does not explicitly teach the identification information transmitting device superimposes a plurality of pieces of the identification information on the electric current or the voltage of the power line, and the threshold value setting unit performs: comparing an initial value of the determination threshold value and a measurement value corresponding to each bit of a first piece of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line, calculating two representative values that are a representative value of the measurement value greater than or equal to the initial value of the determination threshold value and a representative value of the measurement value less than the initial value of the determination threshold value, and setting the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value, the measurement value being included in the measurement values; and comparing a measurement value corresponding to each bit of second and subsequent pieces of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line and the updated determination threshold value that has been set upon reading of an immediately preceding piece of the identification information, calculating two representative values that are a representative value of the measurement value greater than or equal to the updated determination threshold value and a representative value of the measurement value less than the updated determination threshold value, and setting the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as a new updated determination threshold value, the measurement value being included in the measurement values. Regarding claim 4, The identification information receiving device according to claim 1, wherein the identification information transmitting device superimposes a plurality of pieces of the identification information on the electric current or the voltage of the power line, the threshold value setting unit compares an initial value of the determination threshold value and a measurement value corresponding to each bit of a first piece of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line, calculates two representative values that are a representative value of the measurement value greater than or equal to the initial value of the determination threshold value and a representative value of the measurement value less than the initial value of the determination threshold value, and sets the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as an updated determination threshold value, the measurement value being included in the measurement values, the identification information reading unit reads the first piece of the identification information as the binary data by determining whether the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the first piece of the identification information is greater or less than the updated determination threshold value, the threshold value setting unit compares a measurement value corresponding to each bit of second and subsequent pieces of the identification information superimposed on the electric current or the voltage of the power line and the updated determination threshold value that has been set upon reading of an immediately preceding piece of the identification information, calculates two representative values that are a representative value of the measurement value greater than or equal to the updated determination threshold value and a representative value of the measurement value less than the updated determination threshold value, and sets the determination threshold value to an intermediate value between the two representative values as a new updated determination threshold value, the measurement value being included in the measurement values, and the identification information reading unit reads the second and subsequent pieces of the identification information as the binary data by determining whether the measurement value corresponding to each bit of the second and subsequent pieces of the identification information is greater or less than the new updated determination threshold value. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art listed but not cited represents the previous state of the art and analogous art that teaches some of the limitations claimed by applicant. Specifically, U.S. PGPub # 2014/0074308 discusses vehicle identification using a different set of method steps. U.S. PGPub # 2004/0189090 discusses communication elements between a powerline and a vehicle. They are both broadly related. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER P MCANDREW whose telephone number is (469)295-9025. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 6-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lee Rodak can be reached on 571-270-5628. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER P MCANDREW/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12681042
SOCKET ASSEMBLY
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681093
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681049
CURRENT DETECTION CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING ACCURACY OF INDUCTOR CURRENT DETECTION
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12669530
TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING RADIATION PATTERNS OF HARVESTER ANTENNAS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12663357
DIGITAL PORTABLE MAGENTIC PARTICLE TESTER
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 975 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month