Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/865,256

METHOD AND MEASURING DEVICE FOR MEASURING A TEST OBJECT BY MEANS OF X-RAY FLUORESCENCE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 12, 2024
Priority
Jul 26, 2022 — DE 10 2022 118 717.9 +1 more
Examiner
FOX, DANIELLE A
Art Unit
2884
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Helmut Fischer GmbH Institut Fuer Elektronik Und Messtechnik
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
613 granted / 736 resolved
+15.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
749
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
§103
63.3%
+23.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 736 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1-11 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. The method claims fail to recite any steps. Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential structural cooperative relationships of elements, such omission amounting to a gap between the necessary structural connections. See MPEP § 2172.01. The apparatus claim fails to recite any structural limitations other than an evaluation device, which is drawn to a generic computer. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2011/0051894 (Takahara). Regarding claims 1 and 10, as best understood, Takahara disclose a method (and apparatus) for measuring a measurement object using a measuring apparatus by means of x-ray fluorescence, in particular in order to measure the thickness of thin layers on the measurement object or to determine an element concentration in the measurement object, wherein - a primary beam from a radiation source of an x-ray fluorescence device is directed at a measurement object positioned on a measurement table (figure 1), - secondary radiation emitted by the measurement object is detected by a detector of the x-ray fluorescence device and is forwarded to an evaluation device (paragraph [0009]), - by means of an optical device, which comprises an image-capturing device and a focusing optical unit, a beam path of the optical device is coupled into the primary beam by means of an in coupling element and is directed at a measurement site of the measurement object and an image of the measurement site is captured, characterized (paragraphs [0010]­[0012]) - before a measurement task for the measurement object positioned in the measuring apparatus is carried out, a structure of the measurement site of the measurement object is captured (paragraph [0019]), - a focal plane of the beam path of the image-capturing device is moved to by means of a controllable focusing optical unit with a distance Ds, the distance Ds corresponding to a position of the focal plane above the measurement table and above the measurement object, - subsequently the focal plane is moved toward the measurement site of the measurement object by means of the focusing optical unit, - a highest point of the measurement site of the measurement object is captured by an image of the image-capturing device and a distance Di to the measurement table is assigned, - starting from the distance Di, the focusing optical unit is controlled in a plurality of steps and the focal plane of the beam path of the image-capturing device is moved toward the measurement table by the focusing optical unit and, for each step of the shifted focal plane, an image of the measurement site of the measurement object is captured and a distance D2 ... Dn is assigned, - all the images captured by the image-capturing device are converted into a summed image by the evaluation device and output on a display connected to the measuring apparatus (see paragraphs [0043]­[0047]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANI FOX whose telephone number is (571)272-3513. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at 571-272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANI FOX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678114
METHOD FOR MULTI-ENERGY X-RAY IMAGING, X-RAY FACILITY, TREATMENT SYSTEM, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND ELECTRONICALLY READABLE DATA CARRIER
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12681193
SCINTIGRAPHIC INTRACAVITARY MEASUREMENT DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672837
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ADJUSTMENT OF IMAGING COMPONENTS BASED ON OBJECT DETECTION
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667319
THREE DIMENSIONAL RADIATION IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12669451
CORRECTION APPARATUS, CORRECTION METHOD, AND CORRECTION PROGRAM
1y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+13.0%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 736 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month