Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/865,375

CLEANING MODULE AND CLEANING APPARTUS

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 13, 2024
Priority
Dec 30, 2022 — CN 202211734557.9 +1 more
Examiner
TEKA, ABIY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Roborock Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
590 granted / 695 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
723
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
27.1%
-12.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 695 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the applicant regards as the invention. Regarding Claims 1-17 The term "substantially” in claim 1 is a relative term which renders the claims indefinite. The term is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Claims 2-17 are also rejected for being dependent on a rejected base claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Doughty (US 2016/0213217 A1) hereinafter Doughty. Regarding Claim 1 Doughty teaches a cleaning module (Fig 1-11), comprising: a first rolling brush (310a) comprising first brushes (318) ; and a second rolling brush (310b) arranged substantially side by side with the first rolling brush (310a) and comprising second brushes (320, 330) , wherein when the first rolling brush (310a) and the second rolling brush (310b) rotate, an outer contour formed by a trajectory of outer ends of the first brushes (318) and an outer contour formed by a trajectory of outer ends of the second brushes (320, 330) at least partially interfere with each other (Fig 2and 7), and the first brushes (318) are not in contact with the second brushes (320,330) (Fig 2, 8 and 11). Regarding Claim 2 Doughty teaches wherein projections of the first brushes (318) and the second brushes (320, 330) onto a horizontal plane at least partially overlap with each other when the first rolling brush (310a) and the second rolling brush (310b) rotate (Fig 11). Regarding Claim 3 Doughty teaches wherein when projections of one of the first brushes (318) and one of the second brushes (320, 330) onto a horizontal plane at least partially overlap with each other, a distance between the one of the first brushes (318) and the one of the second brushes (320, 330) is less than half of a distance between adjacent ones of the first brushes (318) or of a distance between adjacent ones of the second brushes (see Fig 11). Regarding Claim 4 Doughty teaches wherein the first brushes (318) and the second brushes (320, 330) are able to be in mirror symmetrical distribution in radial sections of the first rolling brush (310a) and the second rolling brush (310b) before the first rolling brush (310a) and the second rolling brush (310b) are assembled on the cleaning module (Fig 11). Regarding Claim 5 Doughty teaches further comprising: an air channel (208) opening located at the top of the first rolling brush (310a) and/or the second rolling brush (310b) and configured such that an unobstructed airflow channel always exists between the air channel (208) opening and an operating surface when the first rolling brush (310a) and the second rolling brush (310b) rotate (Fig 6). Regarding Claim 6 Doughty teaches wherein the first brushes (318) are first long brushes, the first rolling brush (310a) further comprises at least one first short brush (340) , and the first short brush (340) is not in contact with the second rolling brush (310b); and/or the second brushes (320, 330) are second long brushes (330), the second rolling brush (310b) further comprises at least one second short brush (320), and the second short brush (320) is not in contact with the first rolling brush (310a) (Fig 2,6 and 11). Regarding Claim 7 Doughty teaches wherein each of the first short brushes (340) is arranged between two adjacent ones of the first long brushes (318), and/or, each of the second short brushes (320) is arranged between two adjacent ones of the second long brushes (330) (Fig 2,6 and 11). Regarding Claim 8 Doughty teaches wherein the first brushes (318) are first long brushes, the first rolling brush (310a) further comprises at least one first short brush (340), and an outer contour formed by a trajectory of an outer end of the first short brush (340) when the first rolling brush (310a) rotates does not interfere with the outer contour formed by the trajectory of the outer ends of the second brushes (320, 330) when the second rolling brush (310b) rotates; and/or the second brushes (320, 330) are second long brushes (330), the second rolling brush (310b) further comprises at least one second short brush (320), and an outer contour formed by a trajectory of an outer end of the second short brush (320) when the second rolling brush (310b) rotates does not interfere with the outer contour formed by the trajectory of the outer ends of the first brushes (318) when the first rolling brush (310a) rotates (Fig 6-7 and 11). Regarding Claim 9 Doughty teaches wherein the first rolling brush (310a) and the second rolling brush (310b) are arranged one behind the other side by side in a direction of movement of the cleaning module (Fig 2 and 11). Regarding Claim 10 Doughty teaches wherein the first brushes (318) spirally extend in an axial direction of the first rolling brush (310a); and/or the second brushes (320, 330) spirally extend in an axial direction of the second rolling brush (see Fig 10-11). Regarding Claim 11 Doughty teaches a thickness of the first long brush (318) is less than or equal to a thickness of the first short brush (340) (the thickness of the first long brush 318 at its bottom is less than the thickness of the first short brush 340 at its top portion see Fig 11); and/or a thickness of the second long brush (330) is less than or equal to a thickness of the second short brush (320) (thickness of the second long brush at its bottom is smaller than the thickness of the second short brush 320 at its top see Fig 11). Regarding Claim 12 Doughty teaches, wherein the first rolling brush (310a) comprises a first support (314), the first support (314) being provided with a supporting surface that supports a first brush member (372) in a contact manner (Fig 9), and at least a part of the supporting surface being incompressible (Fig 9); and/or the second rolling brush (310b) comprises a second support (314), the second support (314) being provided with a supporting surface that supports a second brush member (Fig 10c) in a contact manner, and at least a part of the supporting surface being incompressible (Fig 10c). Regarding Claim 13 Doughty teaches wherein the supporting surface of the first rolling brush (310a) is totally incompressible; and/or the supporting surface of the second rolling brush (310b) is totally incompressible (see Fig 10a-c par.0020 the vanes are the ones made of elastomeric material and not the core 314 ) Regarding Claim 14 Doughty teaches wherein the first long brushes (318) and the second short brushes (320) are arranged opposite to each other when the first rolling brush (310a) rotates; and/or the second long brushes (330) and the first short brushes (320) are arranged opposite to each other when the second rolling brush (310b) rotates (Fig 11). Regarding Claim 15 Doughty teaches wherein the first brushes (318) and the second brushes (320, 330) are staggered (Fig 11). Regarding Claim 16 Doughty teaches wherein the first long brushes (318) and the second short brush (320) are staggered, and/or the second long brushes (330) and the first short brush (340) are staggered when they rotate (Fig 11). Regarding Claim 17 Doughty teaches A cleaning device, comprising the cleaning module (Fig 1-11 ) according to any one of claims 1-16 (Fig 2, 6 and 11). PNG media_image1.png 603 791 media_image1.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABIY TEKA whose telephone number is (571)272-9804. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 11-9 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathaniel Wiehe can be reached at (571) 272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABIY TEKA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 13, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735869
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729772
ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED HYDRAULIC VALVE COMPONENTS
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729732
PISTON FOR A DISK BRAKE, DISK BRAKE HAVING AT LEAST ONE PISTON, AND SERIES OF PISTONS
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12723373
HYDRAULIC DRIVE DEVICE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12704108
Axial Piston Machine with Neutral Valve Integrated in the Pot-Like Housing Part
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 5m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 695 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month