Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/865,707

High Speed TX Topology with a Supply Controlled Serialization Stage Embedded in a PMOS Output Stage

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Examiner
HA, DAC V
Art Unit
2633
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Retym Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allow Rate
742 granted / 794 resolved
+31.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
804
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.3%
+0.3% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 794 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1, 2, 4-12, 14-20 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 2, 4-12, 14-20, respectively, of copending Application No. 18/861,284 (‘284) in view of Dietrich – US 2018/0343016 and Kim et al. – US 2022/0147482 (Kim) Present application ‘284 Claim 1: A transmitter comprising: a serialization circuit configured to convert parallel data into serial data with one or more serialization stages; a logic circuit electrically coupled to the serialization circuit and an output circuit, the logic circuit configured to connect each input of a last stage of the one or more serialization stages of the serialization circuit, via a respective logic function, to a respective dedicated output stage of the output circuit, wherein the logic circuit is connected to a low voltage supply domain; and the output circuit configured to implement output stages to generate a signal based on the received input using p-channel metal oxide semiconductor (PMOS) field effect transistors. Claim 1: A transmitter comprising: a serialization circuit configured to convert parallel data into serial data with one or more serialization stages; a logic circuit electrically coupled to the serialization circuit and an output circuit, the logic circuit configured to connect each input of a last stage of the one or more serialization stages of the serialization circuit, via a respective logic function, to a respective dedicated output stage of the output circuit; and the output circuit configured to implement output stages to generate a signal based on the received input using n-channel metal oxide semiconductor (NMOS) field effect transistors, wherein the ground of the logic circuit is configured to be a desired voltage value. ‘284 differs from the claimed invention in that it does not recite the underlined claimed subject matter. Dietrich, in similar filed of endeavor, discloses “logic circuit” (Fig. 1, element 16) coupled to the “serialization circuit” (Fig. 1, element 14) and the output circuit (Fig. 1, elements 18, 22) that discloses the underlined claimed subject matter in para. 0027. Kim discloses output using both NMOS and PMOS in para. 0036. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing to have incorporated the teaching from Dietrich and Kim into claim 1 of ‘284 for at least improving the speed of data rate (Dietrich, para. 0004, 0017). Claim 2: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein the dedicated output stage is a PMOS based trans-conductance (gm) stage Claim 2: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein the dedicated output stage is an NMOS based trans-conductance (gm) stage. Note: based on combination in claim 1 above, output stage is an PMOS. Claim 4: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein: the serialization circuit includes a series of multiplexers in the one or more serialization stages, the last serialization stage is an n: 1 multiplexer, and the logic circuit is configured to connect n bits input from the last serialization stage to n gm stages through n logic function. Claim 4: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein: the serialization circuit includes a series of multiplexers in the one or more serialization stages, the last serialization stage is an n: 1 multiplexer, and the logic circuit is configured to connect n bits input from the last serialization stage to n gm stages through n logic function. Claim 5: The transmitter of claim 4, wherein the input of the last serialization stage is connected to the respective output stage with a relevant clock phase. Claim 5: The transmitter of claim 4, wherein the input of the last serialization stage is connected to the respective output stage with a relevant clock phase. Claim 6: The transmitter of claim 5, wherein the serialization circuit and the output circuit are connected by the logic circuit in a way that reduces data load of the last serialization stage and increases operation speed of the transmitter. Claim 6: The transmitter of claim 5, wherein the serialization circuit and the output circuit are connected by the logic circuit in a way that reduces data load of the last serialization stage and increases operation speed of the transmitter. Claim 7: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein each output stage is fed with digital data and output to a common resistor load to generate an analog symbol. Claim 7: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein each output stage is fed with digital data and output to a common resistor load to generate an analog symbol. Claim 8: The transmitter of claim 1, further comprising: a data acquisition circuit configured to generate the parallel data in a plurality of data branches, wherein the serialization circuit and the logic circuit are configured to convert the parallel data received from the plurality of data branches into a single sequence of data. Claim 8: The transmitter of claim 1, further comprising: a data acquisition circuit configured to generate the parallel data in a plurality of data branches, wherein the serialization circuit and the logic circuit are configured to convert the parallel data received from the plurality of data branches into a single sequence of data. Claim 9: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein the transmitter is one of a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) based transmitter, a non-return-to-zero (NRZ) transmitter, or other types of transmitters. Claim 9: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein the transmitter is one of a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) based transmitter, a non-return-to-zero (NRZ) transmitter, or other types of transmitters. Claim 10: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein the logic circuit is connected to a controlled supply and adjusted to enable a current source to operate in saturation. Claim 10: The transmitter of claim 1, wherein the logic circuit is connected to an external reference voltage and adjusted to enable a current source to operate in saturation. Note: the external reference voltage can includes “controlled supply” since the reference can be “controlled”. Claim 11: A method for configuring and implementing a transmitter, comprising: receiving, by a serialization circuit, data in parallel from a plurality of data branches, the serialization circuit including one or more serialization stages; connecting each input of a last stage of the one or more serialization stages, via a respective logic function of a logic circuit, to a respective dedicated output stage of an output circuit; connecting the logic circuit to a low voltage supply domain; and implementing, by the output circuit, output stages to generate a signal based on the received input using p-channel metal oxide semiconductor (PMOS) field effect transistors. Claim 11: A method for configuring and implementing a transmitter, comprising: receiving, by a serialization circuit, data in parallel from a plurality of data branches, the serialization circuit including one or more serialization stages; connecting each input of a last stage of the one or more serialization stages, via a respective logic function of a logic circuit, to a respective dedicated output stage of an output circuit; and implementing, by the output circuit, output stages to generate a signal based on the received input using n-channel metal oxide semiconductor (NMOS) field effect transistors, wherein the ground of the logic circuit is configured to be a desired voltage value. ‘284 differs from the claimed invention in that it does not recite the underlined claimed subject matter. Dietrich, in similar filed of endeavor, discloses “logic circuit” (Fig. 1, element 16) coupled to the “serialization circuit” (Fig. 1, element 14) and the output circuit (Fig. 1, elements 18, 22) that discloses the underlined claimed subject matter in para. 0027. Kim discloses output using PMOS in para. 0036. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the filing to have incorporated the teaching from Dietrich and Kim into claim 1 of ‘284 for at least improving the speed of data rate (Dietrich, para. 0004, 0017). Claim 12: The method of claim 11, wherein the dedicated output stage is a PMOS based trans-conductance (gm) stage. Claim 12: The method of claim 11, wherein the dedicated output stage is a NMOS based trans-conductance (gm) stage. Note: based on combination in claim 11 above, output stage is an PMOS. Claim 14: The method of claim 11, further comprising: configuring a series of multiplexers in the one or more serialization stages of the serialization circuit, wherein the last serialization stage is an n: 1 multiplexer, and connecting, by the logic circuit, n bits input from the last serialization stage to n gm stages through n logic functions. Claim 14: The method of claim 11, further comprising: configuring a series of multiplexers in the one or more serialization stages of the serialization circuit, wherein the last serialization stage is an n: 1 multiplexer, and connecting, by the logic circuit, n bits input from the last serialization stage to n gm stages through n logic functions. Claim 15: The method of claim 14, wherein the input of the last serialization stage is connected to the respective output stage with a relevant clock phase. Claim 15: The method of claim 14, wherein the input of the last serialization stage is connected to the respective output stage with a relevant clock phase. Claim 16: The method of claim 15, wherein the serialization circuit and the output circuit are connected by the logic circuit in a way that reduces data load of the last serialization stage and increases operation speed of the transmitter. Claim 16: The method of claim 15, wherein the serialization circuit and the output circuit are connected by the logic circuit in a way that reduces data load of the last serialization stage and increases operation speed of the transmitter. Claim 17: The method of claim 11, wherein each output stage is fed with digital data and output to a common resistor load to generate an analog symbol. Claim 17: The method of claim 11, wherein each output stage is fed with digital data and output to a common resistor load to generate an analog symbol. Claim 18: The method of claim 11, further comprising: generating the data in the plurality of data branches, and converting the data received in parallel from the plurality of data branches into a single sequence of data. Claim 18: The method of claim 11, further comprising: generating the data in the plurality of data branches, and converting the data received in parallel from the plurality of data branches into a single sequence of data. Claim 19: The method of claim 11, wherein the transmitter is one of a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) based transmitter, a non-return-to-zero (NRZ) transmitter, or other types of transmitters. Claim 19: The method of claim 12, wherein the transmitter is one of a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) based transmitter, a non-return-to-zero (NRZ) transmitter, or other types of transmitters. Claim 20: The method of claim 11, further comprising: connecting the logic circuit to a controlled supply; and adjusting the logic circuit to enable a current source to operate in saturation. Claim 20: The method of claim 12, further comprising: connecting the logic circuit to an external reference voltage; and 18adjusting the logic circuit to enable a current source to operate in saturation. Note: the external reference voltage can include “controlled supply” since the reference can be “controlled”. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Eitan et al. – US 2025/0286758 Hsieh et al. – US 2023/0253975 Ucar – US 11,469,760 Saeki – US 10,784,906 Peng et al. – US 10,728,060 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAC V HA whose telephone number is (571)272-3040. The examiner can normally be reached 7-3:30 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sam Ahn can be reached at 571-272-3044. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAC V HA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597967
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSCEIVING DATA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597982
DETERMINING ERROR VECTOR MAGNITUDE FOR A SINGLE LAYER TRANSMISSION USING A MULTIPLE-INPUT MULTIPLE-OUTPUT RECEIVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592746
CALIBRATION FOR MULTI-TRP COHERENT JOINT TRANSMISSIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587236
CONTROL METHOD AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568003
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, RECEIVING APPARATUS AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+4.0%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 794 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month