Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/866,036

PRIORITIZING AN ENERGY REQUEST OR DATA TRANSMISSIONS FOR ENERGY HARVESTING PROCEDURES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Examiner
BARNETT, JOEL
Art Unit
2849
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
346 granted / 431 resolved
+12.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
467
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
50.0%
+10.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 431 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 14 November 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 6, 8-14, 17-22, 26 and 29-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US 2020/0006988 by Leabman. Regarding claim 1, Leabman discloses an apparatus for wireless communication at an energy transmitting UE [see at least Figure 1, (102a)], comprising: a processor; memory coupled with the processor; and instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor [see at least Figure 1, (104) and (106); paragraph 0046] to cause the apparatus to: determine that the energy transmitting UE is to perform a plurality of transmissions [see at least Figure 19B], each transmission of the plurality of transmissions comprising a data transmission, an energy transmission to charge an energy receiving device in response to a request from the energy receiving device, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1952)-(1970)]; select, based at least in part on an energy threshold and one or more parameters for prioritizing the plurality of transmissions [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285], one or more transmissions of the plurality of transmissions to perform [see at least Figure 19B]; and transmit the data transmission, the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device, or both corresponding to the selection [see at least Figure 19B, (1952)-(1970)]. Regarding claim 2, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions to select the one or more transmissions are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: receive the request from the energy receiving device [see at least Figure 19B, (1952)], the request indicating the one or more parameters of the energy receiving device [see at least Figure 19B, (1956); paragraph 0577]; determine a priority level of the request based at least in part on the one or more parameters of the energy receiving device [see at least Figure 19B, (1958)]; and select the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device based at least in part on the priority level of the request satisfying a priority level threshold [see at least Figure 19B, (1964)]. Regarding claim 6, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions to select the one or more transmissions are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: receive an indication of a first priority of data at the energy receiving device [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)]; and select the one or more transmissions based at least in part on comparing the first priority of the data at the energy receiving device and a second priority of the data transmission [see at least Figure 19B, (1958); paragraphs 0496-0497], wherein the selecting comprises: select the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device based at least in part on the first priority being greater than the second priority in accordance with the comparing; or select the data transmission based at least in part on the second priority being greater than the first priority in accordance with the comparing [see at least paragraph 0577]. Regarding claim 8, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions to select the one or more transmissions are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: receive control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the data transmission, the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)-(1958)], according to a prioritization schedule in a time-domain, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the prioritization schedule in the time-domain [see at least paragraph 0268; paragraph 0439; paragraph 0565]; and select, at an instance in the time-domain, the one or more transmissions of the plurality of transmissions to perform based at least in part on the prioritization schedule [see at least Figure 19B, (1958)]. Regarding claim 9, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: receive, from a network entity, control signaling indicating the one or more parameters, the energy threshold, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1956); paragraph 0230]. Regarding claim 10, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: determine that transmitting the data transmission or the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device corresponds to a first energy value less than the energy threshold [see at least Figure 19B, (1960)]; and transmit additional energy transmissions to charge an additional energy receiving device based at least in part on the energy value being less than the energy threshold, the additional energy transmissions corresponding to a second energy value comprising a difference between the first energy value and the energy threshold [see at least Figure 19B; there are multiple receivers that are charged/powered in a priority order]. Regarding claim 11, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the one or more parameters comprise a quality of service value of data associated with the energy receiving device, priority of data associated with the energy receiving device, a remaining packet delay budget of data associated with the energy receiving device, a current quality of service associated with charging the energy receiving device, a current transmit data rate condition associated with the energy receiving device, a current receive data rate condition associated with the energy receiving device, a UE class, an energy state of the energy receiving device, a current charging rate associated with the energy receiving device, a current discharging rate associated with the energy receiving device, a time of arrival of the request, or any combination thereof [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285]. Regarding claim 12, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 11, wherein the UE class indicates a minimum or default charging rate of the energy receiving device, a minimum or default discharge rate of the energy receiving device, a transmit data rate of the energy receiving device, a receive data rate of the energy receiving device, a quality of service condition associated with charging the energy receiving device, a charging technique of the energy receiving device, a harvesting architecture of the energy receiving device, a capability to harvest radio frequency energy from one or more of frequency bands, a capability to harvest from different type of energy harvesting technologies, an application monitored by the energy receiving device, or any combination thereof [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285]. Regarding claim 13, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the energy transmission comprises a repetition of the data transmission [see at least Figure 19B; the method is repeated]. Regarding claim 14, Leabman discloses an apparatus for wireless communication at a network entity [see at least Figure 1, (100), (116) and (118)], comprising: a processor [see at least Figure 1, (104)]; memory coupled with the processor [see at least Figure 1, (106)]; and instructions stored in the memory and executable by the processor [see at least paragraph 0046] to cause the apparatus to: determine that an energy transmitting user equipment (UE) [see at least Figure 1, (102a)] is to perform a plurality of transmissions, each transmission of the plurality of transmissions comprising a data transmission, an energy transmission to charge an energy receiving device in response to a request from the energy receiving device, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1952)-(1970)]; and transmit, to the energy transmitting UE and based at least in part on an energy threshold of the energy transmitting UE [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285], one or more parameters for prioritizing the plurality of transmissions at the energy transmitting UE [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)-(1958)]. Regarding claim 17, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 14, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the data transmission, the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)-(1958)], according to a prioritization schedule in a time-domain, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the prioritization schedule in the time-domain [see at least paragraph 0268; paragraph 0439; paragraph 0565]. Regarding claim 18, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 14, wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit, to the energy transmitting UE, control signaling indicating the one or more parameters, the energy threshold, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1956); paragraph 0230]. Regarding claim 19, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more parameters comprise a quality of service value of data associated with the energy receiving device, priority of data associated with the energy receiving device, a remaining packet delay budget of data associated with the energy receiving device, a current quality of service associated with charging the energy receiving device, a current transmit data rate condition associated with the energy receiving device, a current receive data rate condition associated with the energy receiving device, a UE class, an energy state of the energy receiving device, a current charging rate associated with the energy receiving device, a current discharging rate associated with the energy receiving device, a time of arrival of the request, or any combination thereof [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285]. Regarding claim 20, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 19, wherein the UE class indicates a minimum or default charging rate of the energy receiving device, a minimum or default discharge rate of the energy receiving device, a transmit data rate of the energy receiving device, a receive data rate of the energy receiving device, a quality of service condition associated with charging the energy receiving device, a charging technique of the energy receiving device, a harvesting architecture of the energy receiving device, a capability to harvest radio frequency energy from one or more of frequency bands, a capability to harvest from different type of energy harvesting technologies, an application monitored by the energy receiving device, or any combination thereof [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285]. Regarding claim 21, Leabman discloses a method for wireless communication at an energy transmitting UE [see at least Figure 1, (102a)], comprising: determining that the energy transmitting UE is to perform a plurality of transmissions, each transmission of the plurality of transmissions comprising a data transmission, an energy transmission to charge an energy receiving device in response to a request from the energy receiving device, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1952)-(1970)]; selecting, based at least in part on an energy threshold and one or more parameters for prioritizing the plurality of transmissions [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285], one or more transmissions of the plurality of transmissions to perform; and transmitting the data transmission, the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device, or both corresponding to the selection [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)-(1958)]. Regarding claim 22, Leabman discloses the method of claim 21, wherein selecting the one or more transmissions comprises: receiving the request from the energy receiving device, the request indicating the one or more parameters of the energy receiving device [see at least Figure 19B, (1952)-(1956)]; determining a priority level of the request based at least in part on the one or more parameters of the energy receiving device [see at least Figure 19B, (1958)]; and selecting the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device based at least in part on the priority level of the request satisfying a priority level threshold [see at least Figure 19B, (1960)-(1970)]. Regarding claim 26, Leabman disclose a method for wireless communication at a network entity [see at least Figure 1, (100), (116) and (118)], comprising: determining that an energy transmitting user equipment (UE) [see at least Figure 1, (102a)] is to perform a plurality of transmissions, each transmission of the plurality of transmissions comprising a data transmission, an energy transmission to charge an energy receiving device in response to a request from the energy receiving device, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1952)-(1970)]; and transmitting, to the energy transmitting UE and based at least in part on an energy threshold of the energy transmitting UE [see at least paragraphs 0284-0285], one or more parameters for prioritizing the plurality of transmissions at the energy transmitting UE [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)-(1958)]. Regarding claim 29, Leabman discloses the method of claim 26, further comprising: transmitting control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the data transmission, the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)-(1958)], according to a prioritization schedule in a time-domain, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the prioritization schedule in the time- domain [see at least paragraph 0268; paragraph 0439; paragraph 0565]. Regarding claim 30, Leabman discloses the method of claim 26, further comprising: transmitting, to the energy transmitting UE, control signaling indicating the one or more parameters, the energy threshold, or both [see at least Figure 19B, (1956); paragraph 0230]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 3-5, 15, 23 and 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2020/0006988 by Leabman in view of US 2015/0333536 by Ganem et al. (Ganem hereinafter). Regarding claim 3, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1. Leabman fails to explicitly disclose wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: receive control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the plurality of transmissions according to a first time of arrival of the request, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the time of arrival of the request. However, Ganem discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0078]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize receivers based on time of arrival of a request in order to transmit to receivers that have first requested transmission. Thus, allowing for first requested receivers to be serviced before later requested receivers and prioritizing earlier customers. Regarding claim 4, Leabman in view of Ganem teaches the apparatus of claim 3. Ganem discloses wherein the instructions to select the one or more transmissions are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: select the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device based at least in part on the time of arrival of the request being before another time of arrival of a second request from a second energy receiving device [see at least paragraph 0078]. Regarding claim 5, Leabman in view of Ganem teaches the apparatus of claim 3. Ganem discloses wherein the instructions to select the one or more transmissions are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: select the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device, the data transmission, or both based at least in part on the time of arrival of the request satisfying a threshold time of arrival; or select the data transmission based at least in part on the time of arrival of the request failing to satisfy a threshold time of arrival [see at least paragraph 0078]. Regarding claim 15, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 14. Leabman fails to explicitly disclose wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the plurality of transmissions according to a first time of arrival of the request, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the time of arrival of the request. However, Ganem discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0078]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize receivers based on time of arrival of a request in order to transmit to receivers that have first requested transmission. Thus, allowing for first requested receivers to be serviced before later requested receivers and prioritizing earlier customers. Regarding claim 23, Leabman discloses the method of claim 21. Leabman fails to explicitly disclose further comprising: receiving control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the plurality of transmissions according to a first time of arrival of the request, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the time of arrival of the request. However, Ganem discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0078]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize receivers based on time of arrival of a request in order to transmit to receivers that have first requested transmission. Thus, allowing for first requested receivers to be serviced before later requested receivers and prioritizing earlier customers. Regarding claim 27, Leabman discloses the method of claim 26. Leabman fails to explicitly disclose further comprising: transmitting control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the plurality of transmissions according to a first time of arrival of the request, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the time of arrival of the request. However, Ganem discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0078]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize receivers based on time of arrival of a request in order to transmit to receivers that have first requested transmission. Thus, allowing for first requested receivers to be serviced before later requested receivers and prioritizing earlier customers. Claims 7, 16, 24-25 and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2020/0006988 by Leabman in view of US 2021/0152022 by Kim et al. (Kim hereinafter). Regarding claim 7, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 1. Leabman fails to disclose wherein the instructions to select the one or more transmissions are executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: receive control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the data transmission, wherein the control signaling comprises the one or more parameters; and select the data transmission to perform based at least in part on the control signaling. However, Kim discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0107]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize data transmission in order to allow the system act as a communication device. Thus, expanding the communication area and allowing the system to identify more receivers that can be serviced leading to an expanded power network. Regarding claim 16, Leabman discloses the apparatus of claim 14. Leabman fails to disclose wherein the instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the apparatus to: transmit control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the data transmission, wherein the control signaling comprises the one or more parameters. However, Kim discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0107]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize data transmission in order to allow the system act as a communication device. Thus, expanding the communication area and allowing the system to identify more receivers that can be serviced leading to an expanded power network. Regarding claim 24, Leabman discloses the method of claim 21, wherein selecting the one or more transmissions comprises: receiving an indication of a first priority of data at the energy receiving device [see at least Figure 19B, (1958)]; and selecting the one or more transmissions based at least in part on comparing the first priority of the data at the energy receiving device and a second priority of the data transmission [see at least Figure 19B, (1956)-(1958); paragraphs 0284-0285], wherein the selecting comprises: selecting the energy transmission to charge the energy receiving device based at least in part on the first priority being greater than the second priority in accordance with the comparing [see at least Figure 19B, (1960)-(1970)]. Leabman fails to disclose or selecting the data transmission based at least in part on the second priority being greater than the first priority in accordance with the comparing. However, Kim discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0107]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize data transmission in order to allow the system act as a communication device. Thus, expanding the communication area and allowing the system to identify more receivers that can be serviced leading to an expanded power network. Regarding claim 25, Leabman discloses the method of claim 21. Leabman fails to disclose wherein selecting the one or more transmissions comprises: receiving control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the data transmission, wherein the control signaling comprises the one or more parameters; and selecting the data transmission to perform based at least in part on the control signaling. However, Kim discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0107]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize data transmission in order to allow the system act as a communication device. Thus, expanding the communication area and allowing the system to identify more receivers that can be serviced leading to an expanded power network. Regarding claim 28, Leabman discloses the method of claim 26. Leabman fails to disclose further comprising: transmitting control signaling indicating for the energy transmitting UE to prioritize the data transmission, wherein the control signaling comprises the one or more parameters. However, Kim discloses this limitation [see at least paragraph 0107]. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the Applicant's invention to prioritize data transmission in order to allow the system act as a communication device. Thus, expanding the communication area and allowing the system to identify more receivers that can be serviced leading to an expanded power network. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Staring et al. (US 2025/0038581) discloses a wireless power transmission system that selects communication modes. Butt et al. (US 2022/0346022) discloses energy harvesting systems with power/data transmission. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOEL BARNETT whose telephone number is (571)272-2879. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rexford Barnie can be reached at (571) 272-7492. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOEL BARNETT/Examiner, Art Unit 2836 /DANIEL CAVALLARI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2836
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603527
ENERGY COLLECTION DEVICE AND RECTIFIER CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597798
REDUNDANT POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589675
FUEL CELL VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586935
METHODS OF DELIVERING POWER TO COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK EQUIPMENT AND RELATED SYSTEMS AND COAXIAL CABLES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583363
ELECTRIC VEHICLE EMPLOYING FUEL CELLS AND RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.5%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 431 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month