Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026
Application No. 18/866,395

PHOTOTHERAPY APPARATUS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 15, 2024
Priority
Sep 16, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0117256 +1 more
Examiner
MORALES, JON ERIC C
Art Unit
3796
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tecure Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1085 granted / 1271 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1331
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
§103
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§102
34.5%
-5.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1271 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 14-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Miyagawa (US 20200289202). Regarding claim 14, Miyagawa discloses A phototherapy apparatus, comprising a light generator 12 configured to generate a laser beam (Fig. 1, abstract); an optical fiber 29 coupled to the light generator 12 and including a light transfer portion 32 configured to transfer the laser beam (Fig. 3, section 0082) and a light scattering portion 33 configured to output the laser beam in a radial direction 42 (Fig. 3, section 0095); a first tube 27 into which the optical fiber 29 is inserted, and configured to inject fluid into one end (Fig. 3, abstract, Section 0075); a second tube 22 into which the first tube 27 is inserted (Fig. 2-3), and configured to discharge the fluid 51 in a region 31 with an outer surface of the first tube 27(Fig. 3, section 0079); a third tube 134 connected to one end of the first tube 27 to receive the fluid introduced through the first tube for injection into the balloon (section 0153) and configured to accommodate the optical fiber by forward movement of the optical fiber (Fig. 7, sections 0136-0137); and a balloon 21, 121 configured to surround one ends of the first tube 27 and the second tube 22 and the third tube 134 (Figs. 1, 3, 6-7) and to expand and reduce according to injection and discharge of the fluid (Section 0075), wherein the third tube 134 includes a hole 135 to inject the fluid into the balloon (Fig. 8, section 0136). Regarding claim 15, Miyagawa discloses the phototherapy apparatus of claim 14, wherein the third tube 134 is transparent such that the laser beam passes therethrough (Figs. 2-3, section 0094). Regarding claim 16, Miyagawa discloses the phototherapy apparatus of claim 14, wherein the fluid is injected into the balloon through the hole 135 in the third tube and is discharged between an outer surface of the first tube and the second tube (Section 0153). Regarding claim 17, Miyagawa discloses the phototherapy apparatus of claim 14, wherein the first tube and the third tube are configured as an integrated tub Regarding claim 18, Miyagawa discloses the phototherapy apparatus of claim 14, wherein a hole 135 in the third tube 134 is positioned closer to one side opposite to the first tube among both sides of the balloon (Fig. 8). Regarding claim 19, Miyagawa discloses the phototherapy apparatus of claim 14, wherein on a plan view, the hole 30, 31, 135, has a circular, elliptical, streamlined, slit, polygonal, or irregular shape (Fig. 8, section 0136). Regarding claim 20, Miyagawa discloses the phototherapy apparatus of claim 14, wherein the hole 135 includes a plurality of holes disposed in a circumferential direction or an axial direction 101 of the third tube 134 (Fig. 8, section 0079). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-13 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding independent claim 1, for a phototherapy apparatus, comprising a guide portion configured to accommodate the optical fiber by forward movement of the optical fiber and disposed on the same axis as the first tube, and spaced apart from the first tube along an axial direction in which the optical fiber is configured to move forward; has not been suggested or disclosed in the prior art when combined with the rest of the claim limitations of independent claim 1. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/31/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Examiner finds that the arguments regarding claims 14-20 are not persuasive. Examiner finds that Miyagawa discloses a third tube 134 connected to one end of the first tube 27 to receive the fluid introduced through the first tube for injection into the balloon (section 0153) and configured to accommodate the optical fiber by forward movement of the optical fiber (Fig. 7, sections 0136-0137). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JON ERIC C MORALES whose telephone number is (571)272-3107. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 830AM-530PM CST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Hamaoui can be reached at 571-270-5625. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JON ERIC C MORALES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796 /J.C.M/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 31, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12765842
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT DEVICE, METHOD AND PROGRAM
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12766336
PATTERNED OPTICAL STIMULATION DEVICE AND METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758158
COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR ADAPTIVE PHYSIOLOGY-BASED MONITORING OF A SUBJECT
2y 10m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12755843
SYSTEM FOR COMMUNICATION WITH A PATIENT BASED ON THE DETERMINED SEDATION STATE
2y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12746009
Tissue Clamping System
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+10.0%)
2y 7m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1271 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month