Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/866,604

ROOF HANDLE FOR VEHICLES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 18, 2024
Priority
Jun 08, 2022 — DE 10 2022 114 443.7 +1 more
Examiner
FLEMING, FAYE M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
H+E Molding Solutions GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1445 granted / 1569 resolved
+32.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
1578
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
§103
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§102
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.5%
-26.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1569 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sakuma, et al. (2002/0020250). Sakuma discloses a roof handle 1 for vehicles, comprising at least one bearing block 2 on which a handle body 11 is held and which is fixable to an opening 41 on a vehicle roof 4, the opening being surrounded by an edge (see Figure 6), wherein the at least one bearing block comprises an insertion part 26 which is configured to be inserted through the opening with at least one clamping body 3 that is configured to be positioned to reach behind the edge of the opening, and further comprising a latch 20 that is configured to be inserted into the insertion part 26, by means of which the at least one clamping body can be locked in the position reaching behind the edge. The latch 20 is configured to be pushed into a channel 22, 33 on the insertion part 26. A recess 22 for the reception of the at least one clamping body 3 is formed in a wall on the insertion part 26. The latch 20 is configured to be latched in a locked position on the bearing block 2. The at least one clamping body 3 has a substantially cylindrical shape. The at least one clamping body 3 comprises at least one cutting edge 32 which can be driven at least partially into the edge in the opening 41. The two clamping bodies 3 are provided on opposite sides of the insertion part 26, each said clamping body 31 being supported on the edge of the opening 41. The roof handle includes two said bearing blocks (see Figures 1 and 2) on which the handle body is pivotably held. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, 7, 10, 13 and 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The recitation of the recess is formed as a cage which holds the clamping body loosely on the insertion part; the at least one clamping bod is movable outwards from the insertion part; the latch comprising at least one bendable web; the at least one clamping body is made of a wound wire; the handle body includes at least one pressing piece in combination with the rest of the recited elements is clearly not disclosed in the prior art. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art recited discloses common inventive concepts as the claimed present invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Faye M. Fleming whose telephone number is (571)272-6672. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivek Koppikar can be reached at (571) 272-5109. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FAYE M FLEMING/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728939
CRAWLER DRIVE FOR AN AGRICULTURAL WORK MACHINE AND AGRICULTURAL WORK MACHINE
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722458
DEPLOYMENT DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722464
VEHICLE WINDOW ASSEMBLY AND VEHICLE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722728
DOOR DESIGNS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12722593
VEHICLE FRONT STRUCTURE
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+6.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1569 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month