Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/866,937

INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 18, 2024
Priority
May 25, 2022 — CN 202210579102.8 +1 more
Examiner
VO, DON NGUYEN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
866 granted / 958 resolved
+30.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
972
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
§103
32.6%
-7.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 958 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgment The Preliminary Amendment filed on 11/18/2024 has been received and placed of record. Accordingly, claims 19 and 22-25 have been cancelled and claims 1-18, 20 and 21 are pending in the instant application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-18, 20 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Liou et al (CA 3 173 939; art cited by applicant). Regarding independent claim 1, Liu teaches an information processing method, comprising: reporting, by a user equipment, first information to a location management function (LMF), wherein the first information is used to indicate a positioning integrity monitoring capability of the user equipment ([00212]-[00214]: “S801a: The terminal device sends a positioning request to the access and mobility management device. Correspondingly, the access and mobility management device receives the positioning request from the terminal device. The positioning request requests … Optionally, indication information related to the positioning integrity may be indicated in the positioning request.”); and receiving, by the user equipment, second information transmitted by the LMF, wherein the second information is transmitted by the LMF in response to the first information and is used to indicate configuration information for positioning integrity monitoring ([00236]: "For example, the positioning assistance data may be location information of a network device (for example, the ng-eNB or the gNB in FIG. 3, FIG. 4, or FIG. 8A and FIG. 8B) participating in positioning in the NG-RAN device, for example, a physical cell ID (physical cell IDs, PCIs), a global cell ID (global cell IDs, GCIs), a TP ID, PRS configuration information, or other assistance information related to the positioning integrity control” and [00410]: "The transceiver unit 1010 is further configured to send a third message to the terminal device, where the third message includes positioning assistance data related to location information of the terminal device, and the positioning assistance data is received by the location management device from a next-generation radio access network device"). Regarding independent claims 9 and 17, the claims recite similar subject matter as in claim 1. Therefore, similar rationale is applied as for claim 1. Regarding dependent claims 2, 11 and 18, Liu further teaches wherein the positioning integrity monitoring capability comprises one or more of: a capability to monitor a downlink signal error; a capability to monitor a performance of a downlink signal error; a capability to monitor an error caused by a signal transmitted within the user equipment; a capability to monitor a performance of an error caused by a signal transmitted within the user equipment; a capability concerning a supported manner for reporting integrity related information; or, capability information indicating whether UE-based and/or UE-assisted integrity monitoring mechanism is supported. See [0035]-[0040]. Regarding dependent claims 3 and 12, Liu further teaches wherein the capability to monitor the downlink signal error comprises one or more of: whether a capability to monitor a reception (Rx) timing error is possessed; whether a capability to monitor an Rx timing error group is possessed; the maximum quantity of Rx timing error groups supported to be monitored; a supported error resolution; or, whether a capability to monitor a non-line of sight (NLOS) path is supported. See [0035]-[0040]. Regarding dependent claims 4 and 13, Liu further teaches wherein the capability to monitor the performance of the downlink signal error comprises one or more of: monitoring an uncertainty range of the downlink signal error; or, an effective time interval for monitoring the downlink signal error. See [0035]-[0040]. Regarding dependent claims 5 and 14, Liu further teaches wherein the capability to monitor the error caused by the signal transmitted within the user equipment comprises one or more of: whether a capability to monitor a transmission (Tx) timing error is possessed; whether a capability to monitor a Tx timing error group is possessed; the maximum quantity of Tx timing error groups supported to be monitored; a supported error resolution; or, whether a capability to monitor an error in transmitting a sounding reference signal (SRS) is possessed. See [0035]-[0040]. Regarding dependent claims 6 and 15, Liu further teaches wherein the capability to monitor the performance of the error caused by the signal transmitted within the user equipment comprises one or more of: monitoring an uncertainty range of the error caused by the signal transmitted within the user equipment; or, an effective time interval for monitoring the error caused by the signal transmitted within the user equipment. See [0035]-[0040]. Regarding dependent claims 7 and 16, Liu further teaches wherein the capability concerning the supported manner for reporting the integrity related information comprises one or more of: whether periodic reporting is supported; whether event-triggered reporting is supported; or, whether on-demand reporting is supported. See [00219] and [00303]. Regarding dependent claim 8, Liu further teaches performing, by the user equipment, the positioning integrity monitoring based on the second information. See [0035]-[0040]. Regarding dependent claim 10, Liu further teaches wherein before the receiving, by the LMF, the first information reported by the user equipment, the method further comprises: transmitting, by the LMF, a first request to the user equipment; wherein the receiving, by the LMF, the first information reported by the user equipment comprises: receiving, by the LMF, the first information reported by the user equipment in response to the first request. See [00212]-[00214], [00236] and [00410]. Regarding dependent claim 20, Liu further teaches a memory, a transceiver, and a processor; wherein the memory is configured to store a computer program, the transceiver is configured to transmit and receive data under control of the processor, and the processor is configured to read the computer program in the memory to perform the information processing method according to claim 9. See rationale as applied to claimed 9 above and [00492] processor and memory. Regarding dependent claim 21, Liu further teaches wherein the positioning integrity monitoring capability comprises one or more of: a capability to monitor a downlink signal error; a capability to monitor a performance of a downlink signal error; a capability to monitor an error caused by a signal transmitted within the user equipment; a capability to monitor a performance of an error caused by a signal transmitted within the user equipment; a capability concerning a supported manner for reporting integrity related information; or, capability information indicating whether UE-based and/or UE-assisted integrity monitoring mechanism is supported. See [0035]-[0040]. Conclusion Examiner's note: Examiner has cited particular columns and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings of the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested from the applicant, in preparing responses, to fully consider the references in entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the Examiner. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. References Li et al (US 12,666,384), Liu et al (US 2023/0152469), Wang (US 2023/0188995), Ghimire et al (US 2023/0258815), Mohammad Soleymani et al (US 2024/0064849), Rao et al (US 2025/008883) and Hu et al (US 2025/0324385) are cited because they are pertinent to the method and apparatus for positioning a user equipment. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DON NGUYEN VO whose telephone number is (571) 272-3018. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 9:00 to 6:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated-interview-request-air-form. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth N Vanderpuye, can be reached on 571-272-3078. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DON N VO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2634
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704581
RSTD Measurement Report Mapping for NR Positioning
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700880
DIGITAL PRE-DISTORTION (DPD) ADAPTATION FLOW AND ACCOMPANYING INTERFACES IMPLEMENTED IN A PROGRAMMABLE PROCESSING ARRAY
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701533
REFERENCE SIGNAL RECEIVED POWER MEASUREMENT BASED ON PEAK OF EARLIEST PATH
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700929
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR MEASUREMENT PERIOD FORMULATION FOR POSITIONING
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701386
DETERMINING LOCATION USING BLE SIGNALS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+0.7%)
2y 0m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 958 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month