Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/867,317

NETWORK NODE CAPABILITY DETECTION FOR DATA CHANNEL APPLICATIONS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 19, 2024
Priority
Jul 22, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2022107327
Examiner
SALL, EL HADJI MALICK
Art Unit
2457
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
843 granted / 925 resolved
+33.1% vs TC avg
Minimal -8% lift
Without
With
+-8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
935
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.7%
-29.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.8%
+2.8% vs TC avg
§102
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 925 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the amendment filed on August 13, 2026. Claims 1- 30 are pending. Claims 1-30 represent NETWORK NODE CAPABILITY DETECTION FOR DATA CHANNEL APPLICATIONS. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 2. Claims 1-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by He et al. U.S. 9,948,608. He teaches the invention as claimed including Systems Ana Methods For Using An HTTP-aware Client Agent (see abstract). As to claim 1, He teaches a first network node (figure 1C) comprising: a memory having first code stored thereon (figure 1C, item 122); and at least one processor (figure 1C, 101) coupled to the memory, wherein the at least one processor is configured to execute the first code to cause the first network node to: connect to a second network node (column 19, lines 43-48); transmit a hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) request for first application information to the second network node (abstract; figure 5, item 505); receive an HTTP response including the first application information from the second network node (figure 5, item 507); determine one or more applications supported by the first network node based on the first application information (column 5, line 63 to column 6, line 3); and at least one of: display information indicative of the one or more applications, or select a first application of the one or more applications (column 6, lines 3-5). As to claim 2, He teaches the first network node of claim 1, wherein the first application information includes respective capability requirement information corresponding to each respective application of the one or more applications, and wherein to determine the one or more applications supported by the first network node, the at least one processor is configured to execute the first code to cause the first network node to determine the one or more applications supported by the first network node based on network node capability information of the first network node and the first application information (column 20, lines 34-50). As to claim 3, He teaches the first network node of claim 1, wherein the HTTP request includes network node capability information of the first network node, and wherein the first application information includes information indicative of whether the network node capability information satisfies one or more respective capability requirements of each respective application of the one or more applications (column 30, lines 28-45). As to claim 4, He teaches the first network node of claim 3, wherein the network node capability information comprises at least one of. codec capability information; artificial intelligence capability information; positioning capability information; augmented reality communication capability information; short message service (SMS) capability information; multimedia messaging service (MMS) capability information; storage capability information; camera capability information; microphone capability information; speaker capability information; WiFi capability information; Bluetooth capability information; haptic sensor capability information; electrical heart sensor capability information; infrared scanner capability information; drone control capability information; gyroscopic sensor capability information; or infrared unit capability information (figure 1C). As to claim 5, He teaches the first network node of claim 1, wherein to connect to the second network node, the at least one processor is configured to execute the first code to cause the first network node to establish a bootstrap internet protocol multimedia subsystem (IMS) data channel between the first network node and the second network node, wherein to transmit the HTTP request, the at least one processor is configured to execute the first code to cause the first network node to transmit the HTTP request via the bootstrap IMS data channel, and wherein to receive the HTTP request, the at least one processor is configured to execute the first code to cause the first network node to receive the HTTP response via the bootstrap IMS data channel (abstract). As to claim 6, He teaches the first network node of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the first code to cause the first network node to: download a menu application from the second network node, wherein the menu application comprises second code for at least one of: causing the first network node to determine network node capability information of the first network node, causing the first network node to transmit the HTTP request, or causing the first network node to determine one or more applications supported by the first network node based on the first application information (abstract). As to claim 7, He teaches the first network node of claim 1, wherein the first network node comprises a user equipment (UE), and wherein the second network node comprises a data channel server (figure 1A). As to claim 8, He teaches the first network node of claim 1, wherein the one or more applications comprise at least one of: a voice chat application; a text chat application; or a video chat application (column 32, lines 4-8). As to claim 9, He teaches the first network node of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to execute the first code to cause the first network node to: establish a data channel between the first network node and a third network node for the first application of the one or more applications (column 2, lines 22-31). Claims 10-30 did not teach anything different from the above rejected claims, therefore are rejected similarly. Response to Arguments 3. Applicant's arguments filed August 13, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. As to point (A), He fails to disclose or suggest at least one processor configured to "determine one or more applications supported by the first network node based on the first application information," as recited in claim 1. As to point (A), Examiner respectively disagrees. In column 5, line 63 to column 6, line 3, He discloses an application identified by enumeration of applications. Such identified application is construed as the “determine one or more application supported by the first network based on the first application information.” i.e. the client 102 communicating directly with the server 106 (node) to access the identified application. As to point (B), He fails to disclose that "the first application information includes respective capability requirement information corresponding to each respective application of the one or more applications,” as in claim 2. As to point (B), Examiner respectively disagrees. In column 20, lines 34-50, He discloses the network layer or layer 2 of the network packet identifies a destination server 106, the appliance 200 determines the server 106 to distribute the network packet by “first” application information and data carried as payload of the transport layer packet. Such teaching clearly discloses “the first application information including respective capability requirement information corresponding to each respective application.” Furthermore, He disclose one or more applications may communicate via the network stack 310 to a network 104, one of the applications such as web browser may include program 322 (column 21, lines 50-67). Conclusion 4. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EL HADJI SALL whose telephone number is (571)272-4010. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-8:30 (flexible). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ario Etienne can be reached at 5712724001. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EL HADJI M SALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2457
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 19, 2024
Application Filed
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 13, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750422
ALLOCATION OF SERVER RESOURCES IN REMOTE-ACCESS COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748878
ENCRYPTED INFORMATION RETRIEVAL
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743490
OPERATING SYSTEM-LEVEL ASSISTIVE FEATURES FOR CONTEXTUAL PRIVACY
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744806
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVING CYBERSECURITY BY GENERATING ACTIVITY REPORTS USING MACHINE-LEARNING MODELS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743467
DATA PROCESSING METHOD, DATA PROCESSING DEVICE, DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (-8.3%)
2y 7m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 925 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month