Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/867,515

PRODUCT HANDLING DEVICE AND PRODUCTION MACHINE

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Nov 20, 2024
Priority
May 25, 2022 — DE 10 2022 113 318.4 +2 more
Examiner
AWAIS, MUHAMMAD SUMRAIZ
Art Unit
3651
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Syntegon Packaging Systems AG
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
167 granted / 204 resolved
+29.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
219
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
48.8%
+8.8% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 204 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 12/30/2025 has been entered. Claim 1 has been amended. Claims 1-2, 4-5, and 7-15 remains pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rainer (US 20220110336) and ITO (US 20170165738) have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, rejection under Rainer and ITO have been withdrawn. Applicant's arguments with respect to claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by LU (US 20200030995) have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues with respect to claim-1 that Lu fails to discloses wherein the orientation units each comprise at least one bevel gear as cited in claim-1 and uses different embodiment Fig.8 for failure to disclose bevel gear. Examiner respectfully maintains that LU does anticipate claim-1 as Fig.8-12 shows multiple embodiments of product handling device especially Fig.9, 10, and 11 Embodiments in which the orientation units each comprise at least one bevel gear (Helical or Spur Gears). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 4-5, 7-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by LU (US 20200030995). Regarding claim-1. Lu discloses A product handling device (Fig.10) for the handling of products (objects), comprising: at least two movers (1720, 1730); and a coupling unit (1725) which mechanically couples the movers (Fig.10) with one another; wherein the coupling unit (1725) comprises a support unit (1725) for at least one product (objects) and at least two connection units (1740a, 1740b), which respectively connect the support unit (1725) with at least one of the movers (1720, 1730), wherein the connection units (1740a, 1740b) and the support unit (1725) are connected to one another within a plane (Fig.10) in which the support unit (1725) is arranged, wherein the connection units (1740a, 1740b) each comprise at least one orientation unit (Fig.10A-C, 11A), the orientation units being coupled with one another, and wherein the orientation units each comprise at least one bevel gear (Helical or Spur Gears which interconnect Fig.9, 10, and 11 Embodiments) Regarding claim-2. Lu discloses wherein the connection units (1740a, 1740b) are connected to the support unit (1725) in an outer peripheral region of the support unit (Fig.10A-E, 11A). Regarding claim-4. Lu discloses wherein the orientation units (Fig.10A-C) are connected to one another within the plane (Fig.10A-C, 11A) in which the support unit (1725) is arranged (Fig.10E, since 1740 and 1742 are not offset from one another). Regarding claim-5. Lu discloses wherein the orientation units (Fig.10A-C) are configured to always align the support unit (1725) parallel to the movers (1720, 1730) (See Fig.10A-C, 11A, [0275]). Regarding claim-7. Lu discloses wherein orientation units (Fig.10A-C) each comprises at least one bevel wheel (Helical or Spur Gears which interconnect Fig.9, 10, and 11 Embodiments). Regarding claim-8. LU discloses wherein the bevel wheels are respectively arranged in a corner region of the support unit (See Fig.9, 10, 11). Regarding claim-9. Lu discloses wherein the bevel gears (screws) connected to one another by a shaft (rod 1740A, 1740B). Regarding claim-10. Lu discloses further comprising a control unit (160) which is configured, for a transport of the product (objects), in at least one first operation state (Fig.10B), to position at least one of the movers (1730, 1720) below the support unit (1725) in a perpendicular view onto the plane (Fig.10B). Regarding claim-11. Lu discloses wherein the control unit (160) is configured, in the first operation state (Fig.10B), to position the at least two movers (1730, 1720) beside one another below the support unit (1725) in a perpendicular view onto the plane (Fig.10A-C). Regarding claim-12. Lu discloses further comprising a control unit (160) which is configured, for a transport of the product (objects), in at least one first operation state (Fig.10B), to position at least one of the movers (1720, 1730) below the support unit (1725) in a perpendicular view onto the plane, wherein for a further treatment of the product (objects), the control unit (160) is configured, in at least one second operation state (Fig.10A, C), to position at least one of the movers (1720, 1730) at least partially beside the support unit in a perpendicular view onto the plane (Fig.10A-C, 11A) Regarding claim-13. Lu discloses wherein the control unit (160) is configured, in the second operation state (Fig.10A, C), to position the at least two movers (1720, 1730) at least partially beside the support unit (1725) in a perpendicular view onto the plane (Fig.10A-C, 11A). Regarding claim-14. Lu discloses wherein at least one of the at least two movers (1720, 1730) is supported rotatably relative to the coupling unit (1725) around a rotation axis (See Fig.11A). Regarding claim-15. Lu discloses A production machine ([0431]) with a product handling device (Fig.10A-C). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUHAMMAD AWAIS whose telephone number is (571)272-4955. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7-4 pm (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Gene Crawford can be reached at (571)272-6911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MA/Examiner, Art Unit 3651 /GENE O CRAWFORD/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3651
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 22, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747115
APPARATUS FOR TRANSPORTING OBJECTS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747138
BRAKE SYSTEM FOR A CONVEYOR SYSTEM, METHOD FOR DETECTING A BRAKE OF A CONVEYOR SYSTEM, AND CONTROLLER
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741820
Transport Facility
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12735266
VIBRATING APPARATUS AND CORRESPONDING METHOD FOR CONVEYING OBJECTS
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735264
Material processing device and method for adjusting a conveyor device of a material processing device
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+9.5%)
2y 2m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 204 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month